- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chevy did it again...All-new Chevy Silverado pickup
Posted on 12/17/17 at 3:17 am to PhilipMarlowe
Posted on 12/17/17 at 3:17 am to PhilipMarlowe
Looks like the finally have round fender wells instead of square. Also since they are going to aluminum I wonder if they will stop the stupid commercials where they try to break the bed
Posted on 12/17/17 at 3:35 am to Rebel
quote:
Looks like they are trying to look like a Tundra.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 3:49 am to jdeval1
quote:
I currently drive a Ram but I completely agree. GM and Chrysler shouldn't exist anymore. I was completely opposed to the bailouts
Where do you bank?
Posted on 12/17/17 at 4:50 am to LSUFan102322
Maybe it will grow on me, but that looks awful. Something about the front and back looks pinched. And not in a good way. Much like their Colorado, it looks asian to me, like it could be a Mitsubishi.
Maybe a different model will be more appealing?
Chevy is normally my favorite of all the major trucks too.
Maybe a different model will be more appealing?
Chevy is normally my favorite of all the major trucks too.
This post was edited on 12/17/17 at 4:53 am
Posted on 12/17/17 at 5:19 am to bayou choupique
quote:
Looks like the finally have round fender wells instead of square
Was going to post the same thing. The new round looks much better. Would buy it if I needed a truck.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 6:19 am to LSUFan102322
Well at least they got rid of the stupid square wheel wells.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 6:26 am to LSUFan102322
F150 worshippers on this board frantically trying to come up with new and creative ways to downplay this truck.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 6:30 am to KLSU
quote:
Well at least they got rid of the stupid square wheel wells.
So now you will be a customer right? Sure...
I liked them. Looked aggressive and unique.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:02 am to LSUFan102322
Looks exactly like a Tundra, except the very front clip is different (worse).
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:05 am to weagle99
I like the truck. A mix of f150 and tundra. About time they did a total makeover. First time it don't look like a box. The bad thing is, they shoulda kept it hidden until as late as possible (like jeep wrangler). Now people are going to hold off and not buy current models.
And to the idiots against the gov helping GM.... Do you realize that GM is doing better than ever, paid the gov back, kept thousands of jobs in place including other companies that make parts for GM's?
Plus you have dealers/mechanics/etc? Smart move by gov
And to the idiots against the gov helping GM.... Do you realize that GM is doing better than ever, paid the gov back, kept thousands of jobs in place including other companies that make parts for GM's?
Plus you have dealers/mechanics/etc? Smart move by gov
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:15 am to CatsGoneWild
quote:
shoulda kept it hidden until as late as possible (like jeep wrangler).
The 18 Wranglers have quite a few differences from 2017 models. I wonder if prices are tanking on the 17s.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:22 am to starsandstripes
quote:
The 18 Wranglers have quite a few differences from 2017 models. I wonder if prices are tanking on the 17s.
No. Jeeps hold their value very well and there are a lot of people that don't like the new design.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:28 am to weagle99
quote:
So now you will be a customer right?
Not until I see if their weak arse 5.3 engine is upgraded along with the car like suspension. The 6.2 is the only useful engine they offer and it only comes in a few trims.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:33 am to KLSU
quote:
Not until I see if their weak arse 5.3 engine is
The OT. Where a 355hp V8 is “weak”. I agree the 6.2 should be offered in more trim levels—if it was, I’d probably be driving a Chevy right now. But the 5.3 isn’t bad.
The looks on this one aren’t bad. I like the current one better though. looks as good as the F150.
This post was edited on 12/17/17 at 7:36 am
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:49 am to LSUFan102322
Congrats GM, you figured out how to release a facelifted 2014 Tundra before Toyota did.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 8:00 am to jdeval1
quote:
company taking money to develop more fuel efficient vehicles is because our government prioritized fuel economy and created a fund from our taxes and decided how to distribute it. It had nothing to do with the company's financials or profitability.
dels.”
But that’s not what happened here:
In a business plan submitted to Congress in December 2008, Ford touted its $14 billion plan for fuel-efficient cars as a key part of its effort to turn the company around — noting that a big piece of the funding was coming from the DOE. The company’s business plan also urged Congress to pass legislation to provide “incentives for consumers to trade in older vehicles and move to more fuel-efficient vehicles.” About six months later — on June 24, 2009 — President Obama signed the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Act that became known as the cash-for-clunkers program. A Department of Transportation report (table 10) said more than 90,000 Fords were purchased under the cash-for-clunkers program — second only to Toyota — as of December 2009.
—————————————
Like you, I’m not a proponent of subsidies. But every auto maker gets them. Ford pretending to be some financially independent entity that isn’t on the govt tit is just simply untrue. They may not have received TARP funds, but they suck up subsidies as much as the others.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 8:05 am to KLSU
quote:
their weak arse 5.3 engine i
I drove a 5.3 last week (cause my Ford was in the shop. Suck it Ford).
Didn’t think the engine was bad at all. My experience with the 6.0L was good. But I had to fill up every other day. The 5.3 seemed solid and I got 20.9 MPG driving to Laffy. Not sure why you wouldn’t just go get a diesel if you want more engine.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 8:07 am to LSUFan102322
Wow.
I want that truck.
I want that truck.
Posted on 12/17/17 at 8:15 am to KLSU
My weak arse 5.3 has almost 184k miles and I work the hell out of it. Yeah, it's not going to accelerate as fast as some but I use it as a truck every day. It's lived in 6 states and 2 divorces and a 33rd wife and it won't die.
I have a diesel to pull my tractor/bush hog and 5th wheel but the 05 handles everything else.
I have a diesel to pull my tractor/bush hog and 5th wheel but the 05 handles everything else.
Popular
Back to top



2





