- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bring Scout home UPDATE PAGE 8
Posted on 9/2/16 at 3:57 pm to Salmon
Posted on 9/2/16 at 3:57 pm to Salmon
Salmon, you seem to be alone in this thread, but I'll side with you.
For now.
We need the full story of how and why the dog got loose.
We need to know the ultimate motive of the woman keeping the dog.
I've been around enough people who say they are responsible for their dogs, yet they let them roam all over the neighborhood and out on busy streets. I've seen "responsible" owners not have food or water available for their dogs for days. I've seen "responsible" owners of dogs leave the dog chained up tightly to trees. I've seen "responsible" owners let their dogs have litter after litter, and just abandoning the puppies.
For now.
We need the full story of how and why the dog got loose.
We need to know the ultimate motive of the woman keeping the dog.
I've been around enough people who say they are responsible for their dogs, yet they let them roam all over the neighborhood and out on busy streets. I've seen "responsible" owners not have food or water available for their dogs for days. I've seen "responsible" owners of dogs leave the dog chained up tightly to trees. I've seen "responsible" owners let their dogs have litter after litter, and just abandoning the puppies.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 3:59 pm to Blue Velvet
I can't fault them for any of that though. My grandparents had farm dogs. They never went to the vet, because they could buy the shots and treat them themselves. The vet was for emergencies and was forty minutes away.
No tags either but did have collars.
One time the big one came back full of shot gun pellets. One time the other one came back missing a leg.
that was each's first trip to the vet.
Also not that common to spay or neuter farm dogs. Most farm dogs just appear too, it's not like you go out and get them. One day a dog appears, you ask the neighbors, no one claims it, you keep it, or kill it. (my grandparents are hippies and wouldn't kill a dog, but their sadistic neighbors would)
No tags either but did have collars.
One time the big one came back full of shot gun pellets. One time the other one came back missing a leg.
that was each's first trip to the vet.
Also not that common to spay or neuter farm dogs. Most farm dogs just appear too, it's not like you go out and get them. One day a dog appears, you ask the neighbors, no one claims it, you keep it, or kill it. (my grandparents are hippies and wouldn't kill a dog, but their sadistic neighbors would)
Posted on 9/2/16 at 4:03 pm to Napoleon
I agree with everything you said and I know about that firsthand from growing up on a farm. Just pointing it out because the current owner is probably doing a better job than these people; even if she is in the wrong.
This post was edited on 9/2/16 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 9/2/16 at 4:06 pm to Salmon
So I think I found where the seven day rule comes from. Now keep in mind the dog had a collar, which is important here.
It's not seven days of getting the dog, but seven days within receipt of notice, which is way longer.
LA R.S. 3:2773
Eta: if the dog was wearing a collar and no written notice was given, then the original owners absolutely have a claim to the dog.
quote:
TITLE 3 — Agriculture and forestry
RS 3:2773 — Dogs as personal property; seizure of dogs running at large or on property fenced as a fox pen; notice to owner; dangerous or vicious dogs
Universal Citation: LA Rev Stat § 3:2773
§2773. Dogs as personal property; seizure of dogs running at large or on property fenced as a fox pen; notice to owner; dangerous or vicious dogs
A. Dogs owned by citizens of this state and by citizens of other states and situated and located in this state are declared to be personal property of such citizens.
B. Any citizen may, or the sheriff, constable, or other police officers of any parish, ward, or municipality shall seize any dog found unaccompanied by its owner or keeper and running at large on any road, street, or other public place, or trespassing on any premises other than the premises of the owner. If the dog is wearing a collar bearing a tag showing the name and address of its owner, it shall be impounded and the citizen or officer so seizing and impounding the dog shall immediately thereafter by written notice notify the owner of the dog, at the address disclosed by the tag on the dog's collar, that the dog has been seized and impounded by him, and unless the owner or keeper of the dog shall, within seven days from the receipt of the notice, claim the dog and pay the citizen or officer a fee of one dollar for seizing and a fee of twenty-five cents for each day it is impounded, it shall be disposed of in a humane manner.
It's not seven days of getting the dog, but seven days within receipt of notice, which is way longer.
LA R.S. 3:2773
Eta: if the dog was wearing a collar and no written notice was given, then the original owners absolutely have a claim to the dog.
This post was edited on 9/2/16 at 4:11 pm
Posted on 9/2/16 at 4:12 pm to NYNolaguy1
Besides the point this lady now has the dog and has left the state with it. Someone has to know her on here.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 4:15 pm to tigersownall
quote:
now has the dog and has left the state with it
Yeah if it were me I would still file a police report and get an attorney.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 4:18 pm to tigersownall
quote:
Someone has to know her on here.
Her info is on the Facebook page in the OP but I left it out due to the ban hammer.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 4:21 pm to tigersownall
quote:
Besides the point this lady now has the dog and has left the state with it.
I thought she had just threatened this and had not actually done it. I now see the picture she posted where she is leaving.
I would deprive her of everything she had ever loved.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 4:26 pm to Hangit
Seriously. if authorities say it's out of their hands. She would have no camp to come back to on lake Claiborne.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 6:29 pm to tigersownall
quote:
Seriously. if authorities say it's out of their hands
The FB page says LE is involved. They did not give any details.
Apparently the FB crowd is messaging this woman to give the dog back. She is deleting their posts and blocking them.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 6:33 pm to Hangit
I am not an internet badass.
But if a person took my dog and refused to give her back I would visit them with an aluminum bat and beat them as needed until my dog was in my truck.
But if a person took my dog and refused to give her back I would visit them with an aluminum bat and beat them as needed until my dog was in my truck.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 6:50 pm to Hangit
She's not in the yellow pages? I changed my number to my cell last year because I canceled my home phone. Maybe she did the same.
And does anyone know the shelter or at least city she is heading to? I can't imagine it is hard to get in touch with her family members
And does anyone know the shelter or at least city she is heading to? I can't imagine it is hard to get in touch with her family members
Posted on 9/2/16 at 7:01 pm to Blue Velvet
quote:
Dog may be better off with that scary, Satan-worshipping atheist

Posted on 9/2/16 at 7:11 pm to Hammertime
quote:
And does anyone know the shelter or at least city she is heading to?
They are guessing she is going to CO or FL. She used to live in Telluride and has a kid at UF in med school. Her hubby is a DR. in Funroe and we all know how Drs. love negative publicity.
I am starting to think she may really be at home because she is spending a lot of time on FB deleting posts and blocking people. It is hard to constantly monitor social media while driving.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 7:18 pm to Salmon
quote:
grew up in rural LA and all of our dogs roamed free as well, but we always had collars on them with proper identification
So people can't just take the tags and ditch them? Because that is exactly what people do.
It's sad you have to chip your dog to prove the crazy person stole it.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 7:22 pm to dgnx6
The dog had a collar and name tag FWIW...
Posted on 9/2/16 at 7:22 pm to toddzilla
As Billy Madison would say, "you get off your arse and get your fricking dog". Not sure why you're posting on here instead of going to get your dog. I don't even like dogs and I know I wouldn't take shite from people like that.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 7:22 pm to toddzilla
quote:
*Upon research, The rescuer in question is an "out of the closet atheist, and unapologetic liberal" SJW type.
*Dog's family lives in Union Parish, Dad is a cop and Mom is a Nurse. Good, Christian family.
WOW. LOVE this relevant info.
When will LIBTARD atheists finally stop stealing dogs from good Christian families? This story absolutely disgusts me.
Popular
Back to top



0






