Started By
Message

re: Bring Scout home UPDATE PAGE 8

Posted on 9/2/16 at 1:46 pm to
Posted by toddzilla
Gulf of Mexico
Member since Nov 2012
1596 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 1:46 pm to
There is no theft involved. The woman just refuses to give the dog back to the family and is being a coont about it.
Posted by Wimp Lo
My nipples look like Milk Duds
Member since Aug 2016
4548 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 1:47 pm to
She knows that the dog has owners now. She is intending to deprive them of their rightful property.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86677 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

She knows that the dog has owners now.


legally she now owns the dog
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43031 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 1:52 pm to
Bitch would be catching a bullet if she took my dog. I wouldn't even waste time thinking about it.

Knock on the door
"give me my dog"
"no"
BOOM
Come on buddy, let's go get some French fries


Good looking BMC though
Posted by CBLSU316
Far Right of Left
Member since Jun 2008
11435 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 1:53 pm to
Just go to the bitches house and take the damn dog back.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86677 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 1:53 pm to
and then you would be in jail and your dog would probably end up in another kill shelter

good strategy though
Posted by toddzilla
Gulf of Mexico
Member since Nov 2012
1596 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 1:55 pm to
Some extra info ...just to illustrate what kind of people Scout's owners are.



This post was edited on 9/2/16 at 1:56 pm
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86677 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 1:56 pm to
I'm sure they are wonderful people, but I really don't understand the relevance to the point of the problem
Posted by toddzilla
Gulf of Mexico
Member since Nov 2012
1596 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 1:57 pm to
Did you read the original post? Ray Charles can see that this situation is fricked up and wrong on too many levels...
This post was edited on 9/2/16 at 1:58 pm
Posted by StickyFingaz
Austin
Member since May 2013
13511 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 1:58 pm to
Because people are more likely to help other good people

Is it that hard to understand?
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86677 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

Did you read the original post?


Yes.

quote:

Ray Charles can see that this situation is fricked up and wrong on too many levels...


I don't agree with the woman not giving the dog back, but I can also somewhat see her point...if I were to put myself in the shoes of crazy dog person.

If the people really cared so much about the dog, it would have been chipped, or at least had proper identification. Without the lady that has the dog, the dog is probably dead right now. So she might feel that she saved this dog from these people's negligence.

Again...I don't necessarily agree with it.
Posted by SidewalkDawg
Chair
Member since Nov 2012
10307 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Ray Charles can see that this situation is fricked up and wrong on too many levels...


Dude, Ray Charles is dead, he can't see anything anymore.
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43031 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 2:05 pm to
I'll take my chances. Never been known for having patience, and I certainly wouldn't if someone had my dog. My dog is more important to me than someone I don't know. They are disposable IMHO
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86677 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Because people are more likely to help other good people

Is it that hard to understand?


well I think we are more than likely getting a very heavy one sided part of the story, so...
Posted by Aux Arc
SW Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
2184 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

quote:
She knows that the dog has owners now.


legally she now owns the dog




And this is why you should not take legal advice from the OT.
Posted by StickyFingaz
Austin
Member since May 2013
13511 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 2:07 pm to
It doesn't matter in this case... The dog was stolen and anyone with an ounce of common sense or compassion would give the dog back to the rightful owner.
This post was edited on 9/2/16 at 2:08 pm
Posted by VOLhalla
Knoxville
Member since Feb 2011
5221 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 2:07 pm to
So the dog wasn't fixed, wasn't chipped, and was left in a situation where it could easily run away. I hope the original owners get their dog back but they need to step up and be more responsible.
Posted by Boxcar
Richmond VA
Member since Mar 2016
900 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 2:07 pm to
Fuqin Got damn right.

[quote]
Bitch would be catching a bullet if she took my dog. I wouldn't even waste time thinking about it.
Knock on the door
"give me my dog"
"no"
BOOM
Come on buddy, let's go get some French fries

Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86677 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

And this is why you should not take legal advice from the OT.


how am I wrong?

if I'm wrong then they should sue and will probably get their dog back

This post was edited on 9/2/16 at 2:10 pm
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86677 posts
Posted on 9/2/16 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

The dog was stolen


It wasn't stolen.

quote:

anyone with an ounce of common sense or compassion would give the dog back to the rightful owner.


I do agree with this though.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram