- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Border Patrol-involved shooting in Minneapolis; person shot was allegedly armed
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:09 pm to sgallo3
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:09 pm to sgallo3
quote:
you realize we have video evidence and the suspect pulling a gun didn't happen right?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:09 pm to GCTiger11
quote:
Of course this is circular logic because Renee Good protesting her own death is illogical but not to the pearl-clutchers in here
Oh I know.
Otherwise they refuse to answer and just as usual, ignore the facts.
Proving they are being led around by the media but they don't give a frick. They are so stupid they have to be told his to think by others.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:10 pm to GCTiger11
quote:
I think one of them in here said it's because ICE is killing people Of course this is circular logic because Renee Good protesting her own death is illogical but not to the pearl-clutchers in here
They pivoted to lack of training of some nonsense. Yeah. That’s why they were screaming about before Good
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:11 pm to stout
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 4:12 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:12 pm to quail man
quote:feels like context is important when you have a guy having a firearm while impeding the government from deporting non Americans. Hes against the government from protecting our own country.
Isn’t that what the second amendment people have been wanting this whole time? They want guns to protect themselves against the government. And when someone does that, now it’s a bad thing?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:12 pm to stout
quote:
stout
Then why didnt dhs say he discharged his firearm? Thats a pretty important detail they left out that wouldve quelled the dissent
Or you're just believing bullshite, which is far more likely.
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 4:14 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:12 pm to GRTiger
It’s been reported the victim was a legal gun owner with a permit to carry
We can see in multiple videos from multiple angles that he was disarmed before he was shot, and there is no evidence he ever brandished his weapon
You’re saying his possession of a firearm deemed him guilty. This flies in the face of the rights we all possess in this country.
You are deepthroating a boot.
We can see in multiple videos from multiple angles that he was disarmed before he was shot, and there is no evidence he ever brandished his weapon
You’re saying his possession of a firearm deemed him guilty. This flies in the face of the rights we all possess in this country.
You are deepthroating a boot.
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:13 pm to stout
Of course uncle stout is falling for the obvious propaganda accounts and the bots that support them
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:13 pm to NawlinsTiger9
There’s video of him having both of his hands on the ground a full 3 seconds before the shots go off
But you can’t argue with bootlickers
But you can’t argue with bootlickers
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:14 pm to stout
So are videos showing the first shot was from the dead guy?
I was hypothesizing that initial shot came from him whether accidental or purposeful.
Because there was one shot, officers jumped back/very short delay, then he got lit up.
I was hypothesizing that initial shot came from him whether accidental or purposeful.
Because there was one shot, officers jumped back/very short delay, then he got lit up.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:14 pm to NawlinsTiger9
The videos just above your sad little post are perfect.
In case you need to hear it, don't go confronting LEOs with a concealed gun on you. That's lesson 1 of CC class.
In case you need to hear it, don't go confronting LEOs with a concealed gun on you. That's lesson 1 of CC class.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:15 pm to tgrgrd00
quote:
Why do you put the onus on the people who have been trained but the ones opposing don't need any?
The onus is always on the people who are agents of the government to act at a higher level.
quote:
But what about the ones obstructing. Have they been trained?
I don’t support the protesters, and think their actions are doing way more harm than good. I’ve posted as much on here numerous times. So if one crosses the line and suffers consequences, then that is reasonable. For example, I said in the Rene Good threads that while the situation was unfortunate, her driving at an officer was reasonable for him to fire at her.
With that being said, the excessive spectacle CBP is making of their operations is impeding their mission and allowing these protests to happen. For example, CBP has been doing stops and detentions consistently in Mississippi since June 2024 with nothing like what is happening lately because they are doing it quietly at 6 AM. The Left is too stupid to ignore the spectacle in places like MN and gives Trump the leverage to ramp up the force even more. Situations like today don’t help immigrant communities the Left is allegedly trying to protect and aren’t going to get the White House to suddenly change their strategy, all it does is give politicians running for office in November a chance to get on social media and demonize the other side.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:15 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:this is my shocked face.
Of course uncle stout is falling for the obvious propaganda accounts and the bots that support them
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:15 pm to Macintosh
quote:
feels like context is important when you have a guy having a firearm while impeding the government from deporting non Americans. Hes against the government from protecting our own country.
Plus, he chose to interfere with LEO doing their job
No different than if he tried to stop LEO from arresting a murder suspect
There is a difference in defending against a tyrannical government and interfering in a normal LEO operation that has been going on for decades but you can't explain that to lefties.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:16 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:we’ve done this before with Renee good where yall thought she was completely innocent and didn’t hit the cop. “She didn’t see him” “she was scared”. Then more evidence came out and yall kept moving your goal posts. This situation will be no different as time goes on.
There’s video of him having both of his hands on the ground a full 3 seconds before the shots go off But you can’t argue with bootlickers
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:17 pm to quail man
quote:
Isn’t that what the second amendment people have been wanting this whole time? They want guns to protect themselves against the government. And when someone does that, now it’s a bad thing?
Well this dingus put himself in that spot. Ice wasn’t after him but since this virtue signaling asshat decided to interject himself into this situation and gets himself shot that’s on him. So no he’s not in a sense protecting himself from a tyrannical government, but more so doing something completely idiotic and dangerous…
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 4:20 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:18 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
Then why didnt dhs say he discharged his firearm? Thats a pretty important detail they left out that wouldve quelled the dissent
Remember when DHS released a statement right after that chick tried to run over an officer, then we learned even more info as the investigation went on, and in fact she did hit him?
Give it time
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:18 pm to Macintosh
quote:
. “She didn’t see him” “she was scared”
"She turned the wheel"
Morons
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:19 pm to lionward2014
quote:
lionward2014
Good dude with level-headed opinions
Posted on 1/24/26 at 4:19 pm to GRTiger
quote:
case you need to hear it, don't go confronting LEOs with a concealed gun on you.
This is what you said:
quote:
bringing your fancy pistol to a confrontation with federal law enforcement will never be an innocent act
There is nothing about having a firearm that makes one guilty.
He did nothing irresponsible with the firearm.
He was disarmed and shot to death.
And you are okay with it because he had a gun on him.
Like I said: gagging on that steel toe
Popular
Back to top



4








