Started By
Message
locked post

Boeing 737 Max

Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:10 pm
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
33653 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:10 pm
At the end of the day, will you be comfortable flying in it after all of the MACS are supposedly fixed?

I’m still leery of Boeing being honest.....
Posted by TechDawg2007
Bawville
Member since Nov 2007
32635 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:11 pm to
As long as Charles is not in charge
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:11 pm to
If I need to get somewhere from my shitty regional airport, what choice would I have?
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
40333 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:12 pm to
Yeah.

Boeing sucks, but this will be the most thoroughly approved plane ever.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86725 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:12 pm to
I've honestly never paid attention to the plane while flying, so...
Posted by Space Cadet
Member since Sep 2019
446 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:13 pm to
If the good people at FAA say it's ok, then who am I to question it?
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49487 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:17 pm to
I'm with you on that I never look or care anymore. Just want them to have tvs and in flight films
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
36754 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:19 pm to
If it is just me on a business trip, yes.
Posted by RedFoxx
New Orleans, LA
Member since Jan 2009
6825 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

If I need to get somewhere from my shitty regional airport, what choice would I have?


Probably a shitty CRJ.
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:56 pm to
I would take my entire family on it before the crashes as long as the pilots were American and I was flying on an American carrier.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
141148 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Just want them to have tvs and in flight films


I'll add, not crash to that list.
Posted by geaux88
Northshore, LA
Member since Oct 2003
16355 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

I would take my entire family on it before the crashes as long as the pilots were American and I was flying on an American carrier.



^^^^This
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
40225 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

If I need to get somewhere from my shitty regional airport, what choice would I have?


MAX's aren't flying into regionals, that's ERJ and CRJ country
Posted by 225Tyga
Member since Oct 2013
19963 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Boeing 737 Max


Never getting on that plane. They have to change the name of it without telling the public if they ever want it to be used comfortably again
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
21515 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 1:33 pm to
I have little confidence in Boeing doing the right thing here.
Posted by Cold Drink
Member since Mar 2016
3482 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 1:43 pm to
Would have to understand exactly what the fix is. As of now I’m confused as to how they’ll fix the MCAS while also addressing the reasons the MCAS was installed in the first place.
Posted by Tiger Roux
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
5027 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 1:45 pm to
I have flown on 70's era Russian planes so yeah.
Posted by MikeBRLA
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2005
17242 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

while also addressing the reasons the MCAS was installed in the first place


That would mean starting over from scratch from my understanding. Bottom line is they “stretched” an airframe and put engines too large for said airframe thus causing it to be unstable. MCAS was created to “fix” the unstableness.
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
30972 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 2:04 pm to
Nope
Posted by Cold Drink
Member since Mar 2016
3482 posts
Posted on 10/30/19 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

That would mean starting over from scratch from my understanding. Bottom line is they “stretched” an airframe and put engines too large for said airframe thus causing it to be unstable. MCAS was created to “fix” the unstableness.



Exactly. I don’t know enough about airplanes to say one way or the other, but inescapable fact is the problem is straightforward but with no obvious solution. The “problem” with the Max (the MCAS) is actually the solution to another problem with the Max (easy to stall). So I don’t know how you fix the MCAS problem while not exacerbating the problem it was put there to solve.

At the end of the day, Boeing needs to convince more than just the FAA - there’s also every other regulatory body that needs to be convinced. And you can bet they’re going to go over everything with a fine-toothed comb. The FAA in particular will be a bitch because their very credibility is at stake.

I’ve said it before on this forum and as time passes I think more people would agree me Now (whether they admit it or not): this plane never should have been built. It’s a complete fricking mess and Boeing’s best hope is to turn it into a sort of bandaid while they roll out the true 737 NG replacement they should have been developing instead of the Max.
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 2:59 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram