Started By
Message

re: Body Cam footage of Atlanta police shooting released.

Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:29 am to
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
15970 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:29 am to
The argument will be that the taser only has. limited range and it non-leathal, so they should have let him run or kept distance. They had his information and could have rounded him up later. Total bullshite but that will be the argument.
Posted by NotoriousFSU
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2008
12003 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:29 am to
Make sure to thank that white liberal woman for setting that Wendy’s ablaze in response. I’m guessing some of the workers there are black, and now they’re out of a job because of her. Bet she’s bragging about what she did to all her woke friends.
Posted by TigerWise
Front Seat of an Uber
Member since Sep 2010
35131 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:30 am to
An effective choke hold could have ended this altercation
Posted by beauchristopher
Member since Jan 2008
72481 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:30 am to
That officer was extremely nice and compassionate towards him.

He even asked about his condition.

They don't want to do this.

You can't point a weapon at the police and expect differently.

Enough is enough. It's time to stand up to the mob. He doesn't deserve to be fired. What the world.
Posted by Eat Your Crow
caught beneath the landslide
Member since May 2017
9190 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:30 am to
quote:

A taser? Isn’t the whole point of a taser is it’s non life threatening?

Do some googling on taser deaths involved with law enforcement.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
71858 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:31 am to
All of us need to remember that we all have only one recourse on the side of the road. That recourse is knowing your rights and knowing the law. Know what rights you have and what the law says about you, and, just as importantly, know what rights the officers have and what the law says about them.

Other than knowledge of the law and of your rights, you have no other recourse on the side of the road. You can not fight them on the side of the road. You're outnumbered, outgunned, and it will not end well. Your only defense is knowledge, and if you do not have it, or you refuse to use it, the likelihood of things going bad is high.

Court is where your recourse lies. However, if you are dead, you will not get the chance to fight them in court.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Isn’t the whole point of a taser is it’s non life threatening?


No

quote:

Two cops couldn’t subdue a drunk dude without killing him. That’s pretty pathetic



Had the guy shot the cop with the taser he could have disarmed the cop and shot them both.

He was going to get shot no mater what.

The cop felt his life was in danger had he been hit with the taser.

It was a justified shot.
Posted by munchman
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
10369 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:31 am to
Darwinism is in full display these days.

Posted by beauchristopher
Member since Jan 2008
72481 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Had the guy shot the cop with the taser he could have disarmed the cop and shot them both.

He was going to get shot no mater what.

The cop felt his life was in danger had he been hit with the taser.

It was a justified shot.



Exactly. What the hell is he even arguing for?

Can people not see how scary this situation was.

Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
7939 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:33 am to
quote:

The argument will be that the taser only has. limited range and it non-leathal, so they should have let him run or kept distance. They had his information and could have rounded him up later.
The argument could also be made that if you let guys resist by fighting back and running without pursuing, everyone will start doing that all the time, even when you attempt to pick them up later.
Posted by Corso
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2020
11789 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:34 am to
He could have had a gun and shot the cop in the dick and the reaction would have been the same. Justified shootings don't matter anymore
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
73300 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:36 am to
quote:

It’s just as simple as “Black Lives Matter”.


I’d say BLM is not simple.

Social Media the national media tells us BLM just wants black lives to matter as much as other lives.

Then when BLM takes a city hostage with rioting or with these autonomous zones, their leadership puts out a list of ridiculous demands, such as: abolish polish, retrial for all AA’s, release all prisoners in for drug charges, affordable housing, free healthcare, and reparations.
Posted by Teauxler
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
3672 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:37 am to
You have to neutralize the situation
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
53115 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:38 am to
That's how you get shot by the cops. They were nothing but professional with that guy.
Posted by Geekboy
Member since Jan 2004
7316 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:39 am to
quote:

The argument will be that the taser only has. limited range and it non-leathal, so they should have let him run or kept distance. They had his information and could have rounded him up later.

You would have been saying precisely this if it had been your son or brother or father that had been shot.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Bay St Louis, MS
Member since Jan 2006
73964 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:40 am to
quote:


Do some googling on taser deaths involved with law enforcement


Law enforcement are the ones carrying the tasers
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
76603 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:41 am to
quote:

You would have been saying precisely this if it had been your son or brother or father that had been shot.
That doesn’t justify that stance.

Taking the emotional position and overriding logic with it isn’t a convincing argument.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Insane that people are even questioning this shooting



I think it's fair to question the use of lethal force over him stealing their taser. The victim certainly was in the wrong and escalated the entire situation himself, but was lethal force really necessary there? Were the officers' lives in immediate danger? There's certainly an argument that they didn't know his intentions after stealing the tazer and running, but again is that justification for lethal force?

I obviously don't think this one has the egregious nature of the George Floyd or Eric Garner killings, but I also don't think it's a clear cut justified killing.
Posted by Geekboy
Member since Jan 2004
7316 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:42 am to
quote:

The argument could also be made that if you let guys resist by fighting back and running without pursuing, everyone will start doing that all the time, even when you attempt to pick them up later.

True. But know that if you do your jail time will triple. At least nobody got killed.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
58943 posts
Posted on 6/14/20 at 11:42 am to
That cop that was fired is about to get paid.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 22
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 22Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram