Started By
Message
locked post

Atlanta Airport: Why are flights so concentrated there?

Posted on 12/17/17 at 6:59 pm
Posted by LSUneaux
Metairie and MAGA AF
Member since Mar 2014
5056 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 6:59 pm
I understand the functionality of hubs, and the fact that Atlanta is a big corporate city. But why does the hub have to be so large? When shite happens, it fricks with the whole system. Why not take a small percentage of Atlanta flights, and build another smaller hub in the region?
This post was edited on 12/17/17 at 8:49 pm
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49487 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:00 pm to
Because Atlanta likes to ruin everything it possibly can.
Posted by arkiebrian
NWA
Member since Nov 2006
4167 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:01 pm to
Get on it then. Do you have a shovel to get started?
Posted by Cromulent
Down the Bayou
Member since Oct 2016
3449 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:01 pm to
It’s Delta’s home. Everything Deta goes through Atlanta for the most part.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

Why not take a small percentage of Atlanta flights, and build another smaller hub in the region?


Good luck making your connecting flight when you have to drive over an hour to that other hub.
Posted by cj35
Member since Jan 2014
6153 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:02 pm to
In order to get to heaven, you have to go through ATL. Everyone knows that.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
67021 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:03 pm to
If all goes well, it is the most efficient way to move people throughout the country.

That is a big if, though.
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9666 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

I understand the functionality of hubs


Although I suspect that you don't.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26628 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:04 pm to
Delta rebooked my parents on a United flight. They are currently stuck in San Francisco.

Delta should have never closed the Memphis hub. They could have routed more traffic through there when this kind of thing happens.

They need more system redundancy in the south east US.
This post was edited on 12/17/17 at 7:06 pm
Posted by LSUneaux
Metairie and MAGA AF
Member since Mar 2014
5056 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:05 pm to
I know they acquired Northwest Airlines, but you’ve got hubs for Delta in Minneapolis and Detroit which aren’t that far apart. They also have one in Salt Lake, Seattle, and Los Angeles. However in the south, they only have Atlanta.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
48987 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

Good luck making your connecting flight when you have to drive over an hour to that other hub


Maybe the second airport could handle other airlines and the big airport could handle Delta
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
41393 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

Good luck making your connecting flight when you have to drive over an hour to that other hub.



I’ve had to do this for Newark before from JFK. It wasn’t terrible but definitely a bit of a hassle.
Posted by LSUneaux
Metairie and MAGA AF
Member since Mar 2014
5056 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

Delta should have never closed the Memphis hub. They could have routed more traffic through there when this kind of thing happens.


You just helped make my point, unlike the other smartasses in this thread. They should have kept Memphis. It’s ridiculous how everything has to go through Atlanta.
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49487 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:08 pm to
If they're stuck in San Francisco, they should go out to some restaurants.
Posted by CuseTiger
Member since Jul 2013
9105 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:08 pm to
I'm in agreement this event may make delta look at utilizing cincinatti, orlando, and detroit a bit more. With memphis basically done, only cincinatti or orlando make for decent options.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
48987 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

I know they acquired Northwest Airlines, but you’ve got hubs for Delta in Minneapolis and Detroit which aren’t that far apart


IIRC, they have Cincinnati too
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33146 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:09 pm to
Delta has too many eggs in the Atlanta basket. They should have kept Cincy and Memphis as minor hubs.

Their southern US customers are totally fricked today.
This post was edited on 12/17/17 at 8:42 pm
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
41393 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

You just helped make my point, unlike the other smartasses in this thread. They should have kept Memphis. It’s ridiculous how everything has to go through Atlanta.


This. I used to fly KLM into Memphis and it was a great airport to connect to.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26628 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:13 pm to
Sky lounge here at MSP is a zoo. Everyone going to Atlanta is overwhelming the Delta employees here.

Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53616 posts
Posted on 12/17/17 at 7:17 pm to
Do you realize your OP is basically

“ I understand the functionality of hubs, but why do they use hubs?”


Obviously you don’t.

Logistics and planning get experientially more complicated the more hubs you have.

Even with the problems of today, I’m willing to bet the move has saved them more money in the long run without compromising quality too much in the long run.

I’m kind of surprised though that the major transcontinental hub is there and not further north to take advantage of the shorter distance to Europe.
This post was edited on 12/17/17 at 7:19 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram