Started By
Message

Are N95 masks actually effective against the virus? And can we up mass production on them?

Posted on 7/12/20 at 11:45 am
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22380 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 11:45 am
If N95 masks are actually effective why don’t we just mandate all high risk folks to wear it since the mask will actually protect them. Also can we up the production of them to make sure all who want one can obtain one.
Posted by LSUJML
BR
Member since May 2008
45671 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 11:46 am to
Pretty sure answer is yes & the ramped up production is going to hospitals
Posted by ashy larry
Marcy Projects
Member since Mar 2010
5568 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 11:47 am to
If everyone had an N95 mask, how would the OT bitch about people wearing cloth masks?
Posted by FightinTiga
Pumpkin Center
Member since Feb 2009
20745 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 11:47 am to
Well no frickin way that mask can be worn in the field at this time of the year
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22380 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 11:47 am to
Can we ramp it up even more?
Posted by noonan
Nassau Bay, TX
Member since Aug 2005
36903 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 11:48 am to
They can't even keep up with the demand as it is.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22380 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 11:49 am to
Why would everyone need a N95 mask? The vast majority of the population is NOT high risk.
Posted by ruzil
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2012
16925 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 11:49 am to
They have to be fit tested and the wearers have to be trained in how to wear them for them to be effective.

Yesterday at my voting place I saw one of the workers wearing a face shield, N95 mask, surgical gown and gloves. She had stepped outside for a snack and ate the donut with her gloves on, shield flipped up and mask pulled down over one of her chins.

That virus better just go on!!!!!!
Posted by Winston Cup
Dallas Cowboys Fan
Member since May 2016
65497 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 11:54 am to
Because a majority coming from the 3m plant in South Dakota is going towards the national stockpile. Trump is gonna make sure there is never a shortage again
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
72598 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Because a majority coming from the 3m plant in South Dakota is going towards the national stockpile.


Is that at Fort Knox?
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7247 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 12:09 pm to
Make hospital staff start sanitizing them and reusing them. Autoclave for the win.
Posted by Sidicous
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Aug 2015
17188 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

They have to be fit tested and the wearers have to be trained in how to wear them for them to be effective.

Yesterday at my voting place I saw one of the workers wearing a face shield, N95 mask, surgical gown and gloves. She had stepped outside for a snack and ate the donut with her gloves on, shield flipped up and mask pulled down over one of her chins.

That virus better just go on!!!!!!
We need to mandate NO masks and cull the herd!
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
60388 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Make hospital staff start sanitizing them and reusing them. Autoclave for the win.


We do reuse them. That’s the purpose of the surgical mask over the n95.
Posted by RummelTiger
Texas
Member since Aug 2004
89884 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 12:30 pm to
Jesus Christ, man...
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
11290 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Also can we up the production of them to make sure all who want one can obtain one.


Look at the OT solving another crisis.
Posted by JOJO Hammer
Member since Nov 2010
11921 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 12:36 pm to
In order for an N-95 to be effective the user would have to have a fit test done to ensure they have the right size and proper fit.

Wearing an N-95 that doesn’t fit correctly would have little to no protection.

Also a proper fit would require all users to be clean shaven.



Remember the face mask (not n-95) isn’t to protect you, but to protect others.....at least that’s the argument they give instead of saying “we’re just trying to see Just how far we can go before people really start pushing back”
Posted by Spankum
Miss-sippi
Member since Jan 2007
56046 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 1:49 pm to
As a part of the high-risk population, I will gladly wear an N95 where warranted...and probably will in the future. I don’t right now, because want to leave them for the folks in the healthcare fields.

Trouble is, most people don’t know they have the underlying problems that make them “high risk.” I think almost everybody has one whether they know it or not.
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
14965 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Are N95 masks actually effective against the virus?


2017 trial about both viral and bacterial respiratory illnesses found n95 to be superior to surgical masks when looking at 3591 nurses in Beijing.
Surgical masks showed fewer infections than no mask, but it failed to reach statistical significance. If you click the full study (it's free on Wiley. I just linked the synopsis because I thought the "quick and dirty" would be generally preferred), you can scroll to Table 4 which looks at essentially all droplet-spread respiratory illnesses.
The findings?
Continuous N95 arm RR 0.26 (0.16-0.42) P<.001
Targeted N95 arm RR 0.43 (0.25-0.72) P=.001
Medical mask arm RR 0.65 (0.41-1.04) P=.074


What it means:
RR is relative risk vs control. The parantheseis gives the range that could be expected by the data above and the P is the decimal (convert to percentage by multiplying by 100) chance that this was all due to chance.
So for surgical masks, the study found nurses in sick patients were 65% as likely as someone not masking to get sick, test positive, or be able to culture the same pathogen the patient had. Analyzing that 65% closer says that you may be as good as 41% as likely vs nonmask but as bad as 104% (or slightly MORE likely). The chance that this is random chance (you roll a pair of dice looking for snake eyes and get 12 in a row. A statistical anomoly that very easily could happen but could never continue when carried out an infinite number of times...) is 7.4%.
Generally speaking, when a the number in parenthesis (confidence interval) crosses 1, it means that the available data are not statically significant to draw conclusions from. Similarly, the p value being >5% is generally higher than one would like. Doesn't mean you should just ignores the data, but it means that a better designed or larger study should be done.


So what does that mean for our n95 in the study?
Cuts the rate of transmission to about 1/4 nothing, and we are pretty sure that's not by chance (>99.9% sure)



Problem:
They're uncomfortable.
They can dig into your nose with extended use
If you aren't used to wearing them, breathing is fairly difficult. It's not a fat/skinny or in-shape vs unathletic type of thing. It's just an unusual situation and people take them off a lot.
Good news is that targeted n95 mask use was shown to be effective, but not as effective


The last point is that n95 masks must be fit tested or a general person's use of one isn't nearly as directly applicable.


And then lastly lastly, because of this and the propensity for it to spread via healthcare workers to patients, getting them into hospitals took priority to getting them to normal people and will continue to do so until there is a good supply so that the car wrecks who lay in a trauma ICU bed for a month don't get (and several other groups of similar long-stay patients) don't get COVID as well.
Posted by cable
Member since Oct 2018
9652 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 1:56 pm to
N95 are uncomfortable as frick. My face starts to itch after 10 minutes.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
54349 posts
Posted on 7/12/20 at 1:58 pm to
Nah, folks who actually need N95 for work-related purposes are supposed to give the only masks that protect them to the healthcare workers.

I guess my future lung issues/cancer isn't a concern.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram