- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Archbishop fires board of Second Harvest for not diverting money to pay for pedophiles.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:11 pm to geauxtigers87
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:11 pm to geauxtigers87
quote:
They wonder why all us younger folk want nothing to do with them
Yeah I couldn’t imagine being actively involved in multiple Catholic organizations every day as a living and a hobby.

Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:13 pm to ajr1215
quote:
...and Gayle Benson supports the Archbishop
Then Gayle should just pay the remaining debt for the pedophile victims.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:14 pm to Cell of Awareness
Catholic Church and the DC Uniparty…
Tell me the difference between the two.
Tell me the difference between the two.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:22 pm to Cell of Awareness
quote:
At the local level, the Catholic Church was wonderful at one point.
No, it really wasn't. 6% of all Catholic Priests have sexual abused a child. There's a 1/17 chance that every priest you come into contact with rapes children. Think of all the small towns in your surrounding area and how many Catholic churches there are. Do you have 17 in your head? That's not a very big area right? 1/17 is actively harboring a pedophile priest, and they fricking know about it. They just move them around from parish to parish.
And it's all funded by people that donate into that basket every Sunday.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:23 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
John the Baptist didn’t have a church.
Our church is the world brother
The church is not a building, a church is not a steeple, a church is not a resting place, the church is the people (John the Baptist and Jesus were the first baptists)
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:25 pm to el Gaucho
quote:
The Catholic Church pretends that they’re the original Christians when the Bible clearly says that Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist into the Baptist faith
All “Religion” is man made and therefore prone to the same flaws of man.
I align myself more with Baptist but hold no illusions that it has its issues as well. Same for Catholic, Methodist, etc
Ultimately I put my faith in the word of God, read my Bible and live my life based on what I gather from it.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:25 pm to Cell of Awareness
In every place people gather to love and worship God, satan gathers his demons as well. To corrupt and destroy salvation.
You show me somewhere where Satan is not feverishly working for the ruin of souls and I’ll show you somewhere Gods people are not present.
It’s unfortunate that some of you flee from the Catholic Church because of corruption with in it. This is exactly what Satan wants you to do. I know because I ran from the Church for many years and not until I realized the God is in the ugliness still, working feverishly to save souls that I ran back to join the fight.
Remember Jesus did not come to save the righteous but sinners. The righteous have their just rewards.
You show me somewhere where Satan is not feverishly working for the ruin of souls and I’ll show you somewhere Gods people are not present.
It’s unfortunate that some of you flee from the Catholic Church because of corruption with in it. This is exactly what Satan wants you to do. I know because I ran from the Church for many years and not until I realized the God is in the ugliness still, working feverishly to save souls that I ran back to join the fight.
Remember Jesus did not come to save the righteous but sinners. The righteous have their just rewards.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:50 pm to dnm3305
quote:Where in the world did you get this statistic?
6% of all Catholic Priests have sexual abused a child
Posted on 1/31/25 at 1:03 pm to el Gaucho
The funniest part is that people actually took you seriously and replied trying to correct your statement.

Posted on 1/31/25 at 1:25 pm to PUB
quote:
Never knew we were giving $ to the Catholic Archdiocese and not Second Harvest for food. Is Second Harvest another front for the Archdiocese to take in $????
Second Harvest is and always has been a Catholic charity. They do tremendous good for the poor and needy.
Yes, they take donations from all sources including federal and other grant moneys. There is still a huge portion that comes from the collections of Catholic parishes and individual Catholics as well.
It’s one of the many great works of charity and mercy that are quietly performed by Catholics around the world.
This story is more complicated than the newsmen are prepared to understand or explain. It’s much easier to heap more scorn on the church.
Aymond is in an impossible situation. The monetary side of sex abuse scandal is now in the hands of the courts and competing lawyers.
They don’t seem to understand that the Catholic Church is not exactly like a big company or corporation. The operations of the many institution that are run by Catholics take guidance from the Pastors, Bishops, or ArchBishops, or Pope, etc., but can’t be compared to normal for-profit organizations.
The plaintiff lawyers would go after every institution that holds the name of Catholic: the colleges, the high schools and elementary schools, publications, the monasteries, the parishes, the retreat centers, the counseling centers, the orphanages, etc., etc.
I’m going to assume that someone made the decision that the Diocese’s contribution to Second Harvesters should be reduced / returned so that the victims could be paid as part of the Bankruptcy Proceedings. They probably saw a fat bank account over at Second Harvesters, and organization that has a good reputation for actually doing good, and who gets lots of funding.
For those who think the church should just sell properties, that’s has been and is currently going on. The reality is that churches don’t really do well on the open market. Several are up for sale right now with no takers. Our Lady of Lourdes and its adjacent school grounds were recently sold after being on the market for 20 years. Luckily for all, the Freret Street corridor has been revitalized and the property became valuable. That’s the exception but not the rule.
And most of the parish properties were built with the monies directly contributed by the people of that parish. It’s not like the Diocese owns them, unless they get closed/abandoned for lack of attendance.
I think it’s also important to note that sex abuse of children is rampant in all segments of society, and in all churches. It’s the prominence of the Catholic Church, it’s hierarchical structure, and it’s vow of celibacy by the clergy (which is not understood in a sexed-crazed, secular society which vilifies the practice) that causes people to focus on its abuses above those of other churches and organizations.
Notice how lightly we treat the rampant sex abuse of students by teachers. If these teachers were part of a larger organization that could be sued in. Class action way, the coverage would be very different.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 2:22 pm to Jimbeaux
quote:
I think it’s also important to note that sex abuse of children is rampant in all segments of society, and in all churches. It’s the prominence of the Catholic Church, it’s hierarchical structure, and it’s vow of celibacy by the clergy (which is not understood in a sexed-crazed, secular society which vilifies the practice) that causes people to focus on its abuses above those of other churches and organizations.
Notice how lightly we treat the rampant sex abuse of students by teachers. If these teachers were part of a larger organization that could be sued in. Class action way, the coverage would be very different.
Has there been history of covering up abuse of teachers and just moving them to different schools to abuse more kids?
This post was edited on 1/31/25 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 1/31/25 at 2:33 pm to danilo
quote:
Has there been history of covering up abuse of teachers and just moving them to different schools to abuse more kids?
This is the issue for me. When authorities became aware of abuse, instead of calling the cops, they just moved the molesters and rapists to a new location. This happened over and over again all over the country.
It's hard to wrap your head around honestly.
The church is where it is through its own fault entirely and Aymond was a part of it. Not the abuse but the cover up.
And they want good Catholics to bail them out. It's terrible.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 2:39 pm to idlewatcher
quote:I did not go to church much after I started college...I go fairly often now as I am older. I started going more often when my kids started attending a Catholic school.
I often look at the types of people that go to my church and they are almost always 50+ with not that many young couples.
This is nothing new.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 2:48 pm to OweO
quote:
I watched it years ago and I can't remember the name of it, but it was a documentary about.. It was either one guy or several people, who had been at a school ran by the Catholic Church that was for deaf kids
Maybe Mea Maxima Culpa: Silence in the House of God
It’s on YouTube LINK
This post was edited on 1/31/25 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 1/31/25 at 2:49 pm to el Gaucho
quote:
Our church is the world brother
The church is not a building, a church is not a steeple, a church is not a resting place, the church is the people (John the Baptist and Jesus were the first baptists)
What you have is idolatry worshiping a John the Baptist who himself said wasn’t worthy to untie Jesus’ sandal.
John the Baptist was merely a road sign pointing to Christ who really did start a church. A church which continues today which is the Catholic Churches - Roman and eastern rites.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 3:18 pm to Jimbeaux
Support Second Harvest but never knew Catholic.
Thanks for the explanation.
Thanks for the explanation.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 4:07 pm to Jimbeaux
quote:
Aymond is in an impossible situation. The monetary side of sex abuse scandal is now in the hands of the courts and competing lawyers.
Aymond started this process. He rang the bell.
Now I’m sure he didn’t think it would turn out like this. But he’s the one that turned control over to the lawyers.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 6:24 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
Now I’m sure he didn’t think it would turn out like this. But he’s the one that turned control over to the lawyers.
What could you mean by this? I don’t understand your perspective.
The Diocese was civilly sued. They hired lawyers, obviously. They paid a bunch of money, and then filed for bankruptcy. More lawyers and courts and judges. They tried to comply with all requests but the plaintiffs weren’t satisfied - more lawyers and more legal advice and more hearings.
They did other things too. Recall that these cases are all very old. Many of the allegations were sketchy (legally). They were not made by the victim, or the victim’s allegations were very non-specific, or they were investigated by the police and dropped, or the victim/family were already paid (but now they want more, and many other complicated issues like that.
Aymond instituted a training program and a screening program for ALL clergy, religious, teacher, social worker, coach, or even parent volunteer. Background checks and fingerprints is done on all. The training is required for everyone on how to avoid problems, what behaviors won’t be tolerated (being alone with a minor, proper and improper touch, etc.) how to spot others who might be groomers and so on. These policies were instituted about 15 - 20 years ago. The trainings are very well done. The videos were professionally made and actual pedophiles were interviewed.
The amount of sex abuse in the Diocese has been extremely small and every case that is discovered are reported and fully investigated. In fact, the incidence of sex abuse in Catholic institutions is now way below all other similarly situated institutions.
The news that keeps getting reported is of older cases that are still being reported or dealt with in the criminal and civil courts.
This is not to minimize the abuse of actual victims, or of the cover up, much of which took place during a time when these sex crimes were not understood in the way that they are now by society in general. Depending on how old you are, ask your older relatives if there were any incidences of sex abuse by family members or extended relatives “back in the day” and what was done about it. You’d be shocked to learn that more often than not, the matter was swept under the rug and the victim was encouraged to try to forget about it. It’s shocking really through contemporary eyes, but it was just the way things were.
This post was edited on 1/31/25 at 6:25 pm
Posted on 1/31/25 at 7:20 pm to Jimbeaux
quote:
What could you mean by this? I don’t understand your perspective.
He made the decision to file bankruptcy to get a stay on the lawsuits and to try to force a settlement. That led to the number of claims skyrocketing. I think he misjudged how complicated this bankruptcy would be. $40M spent on lawyers might have been spent better.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 7:26 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Bet you didn’t resist very much when the priest put it in your mouth. You seem to slurp with pleasure
I’m no fan of the Catholic Church, but this is a real fricking weird thing to say.
Back to top



0






