Started By
Message

re: American Heart Asso sends rep to oppose Texas bill to eliminate junk food from SNAP

Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:16 pm to
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa-Here to Serve
Member since Aug 2012
17137 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:16 pm to
quote:


American Heart Association is worthless


They were started by big food. I read something about when a company came out with Crisco they wanted to discredit butter and bacon grease so they help get the AHA started and they foretold of the ills of animal fats.
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa-Here to Serve
Member since Aug 2012
17137 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

The logic being that if junk food is not allowed by SNAP, the people eligible would rather just go hungry than chance eating healthier foods?


Dr Now (of tv show 600 pounders) told one of them that they were not going to become malnourished. That they had already eaten the food from 4 years in the future.
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
82214 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:23 pm to
AHA is funded by the likes of those big food companies. So of course they are going to do their bidding. Most of what comes out of the AHA is lobbying in benefit of the Pepsico, General Mills, ect. Once we all learn these things, our country will be a much healthier place
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
20635 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

The only drawback is every recipient will now have two carts at the checkout, one to ring up as SNAP eligible and one to ring up and pay cash for. Lines at the grocery store are going to absolutely suck.


You think they’ll bring two carts?

Bless your heart.


Generally the system does it for the cashier though. They ring up everything then pay for the SNAP eligible stuff and leave a balance on the register for the non eligible.
Posted by CR4090
Member since Apr 2023
9554 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:23 pm to
The AHA is just another worthless NGO. frick ‘em!
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
5226 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:42 pm to
They are bought and paid for by special interest groups I'm sure.
Posted by Dixie2023
Member since Mar 2023
5248 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 6:51 pm to
And ground beef and chicken can be stretched. SNAP is supplemental. Not sole. They are free to buy junk with their money. Most of them whip it right out to pay for smokes and alcohol. They can use it for their junk, too.
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
38914 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:05 pm to
Good. People should eat healthy but as long as it’s food, people should be allowed to buy whatever the frick they want.
Posted by LRB1967
Tennessee
Member since Dec 2020
23173 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:21 pm to
That is surprising. My doctor told me to eliminate junk food saying that it is bad for the heart and blood pressure.
Posted by FutureCorridor49
US 90
Member since May 2023
588 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:21 pm to
I’d love to know the average BMI of the pissed off people in this thread
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77270 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

Good. People should eat healthy but as long as it’s food, people should be allowed to buy whatever the frick they want.
With their own money, absolutely.

If you are using welfare benefits, supported by taxation, society itself should have a say in what it can be spent on.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35947 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:26 pm to
SNAP is corporate welfare.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77270 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

That is surprising. My doctor told me to eliminate junk food saying that it is bad for the heart and blood pressure.
Much like the AMA, these groups are not in the business of promoting health.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35947 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

Good. People should eat healthy but as long as it’s food, people should be allowed to buy whatever the frick they want.


Found one
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
97023 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

Good. People should eat healthy but as long as it’s food, people should be allowed to buy whatever the frick they want.


If only they were actually buying
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
16192 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

ground beef and vegetables, I bet you're close to your daily dollar amount on SNAP.

That's less than $10, and for grass fed beef at H-E-B.
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
12695 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

where the only store within a 20 minute drive is a family dollar and there is no public transportation. I am all for restriction but some effort has to be made to increase better options.


Honest question: you don’t think making healthy items free to throw in the basket and chips expensive will encourage stores to carry a few more healthy items that could be shoved in at no cost to the consumer?
Posted by chryso
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13764 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:40 pm to
Are you suggesting that people should just eat candy and soda because other foods also have a lot of calories?
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122197 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

Why? Because the AHA takes money from Kellogg’s & Pepsi, whose profits would tank if it passed.


And this is exactly how our country is ran. Its almost like a cartel. They push shite that is not at all good for people's health and it all comes back to profit.

I am all for making money, but not by depending on the government to make/keep laws that will keep people buying certain products. These companies are depending on welfare as well.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
73704 posts
Posted on 3/17/25 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

I may not care for these programs but they benefit companies who employ people and farmers who supply the food. It’s all a big chain that keeps things flowing. Cutting out programs don’t just stymie those receiving benefits but hurt the economy and producers when we look at the big picture. Cutting out aid to other countries hurts producers, especially farmers, as well. Farmers have been taking a big hit lately due to losing their labor and no this.


So, in essence you’re for subsidizing the leeches of society and subsidizing the farmers. What about those of us who the government takes half our income that pays for all this subsidizing? What exactly do we get out of this deal?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram