- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Allegedly, Madison Brooks had sex the day before incident that caused that caused injuries
Posted on 3/13/24 at 11:44 am to Indefatigable
Posted on 3/13/24 at 11:44 am to Indefatigable
quote:
I don’t do any criminal work, but unless there’s an exception, I don’t know that the video would be admissible without an authenticating witness.
Now THAT would piss a lot of people off and rightfully so
Posted on 3/13/24 at 11:48 am to Indefatigable
No one is going to buy that. It would come down to when was it more likely to happen. People will say it’s more likely when you’re drunk as frick and struggling in a car. And it’s not like having rough sex the day before means trauma wasn’t also caused that night. I know these oil slicks have to put together a case but jurors aren’t going to get distracted by that.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 11:51 am to AlwysATgr
quote:From the public maybe and it can be a part of an overall narrative but it still has to be established that she showed unwillingness. Being drunk alone is not a basis for rape.
What had been alledged from the start has been she was too drunk to consent.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 11:52 am to The Boat
quote:
No one is going to buy that. It would come down to when was it more likely to happen. People will say it’s more likely when you’re drunk as frick and struggling in a car. And it’s not like having rough sex the day before means trauma wasn’t also caused that night. I know these oil slicks have to put together a case but jurors aren’t going to get distracted by that.
I think you're underestimating the impact of a doctor sitting up there and testifying that the physical trauma cannot be conclusively tied to the events in the back of the car.
I don't think the case will hinge on that, but its certainly something the defense can and will do--if the judge lets it in over the rape shield.
As others have said, whatever videos from inside the car exist will probably determine how it goes at trial.
This post was edited on 3/13/24 at 11:53 am
Posted on 3/13/24 at 11:59 am to Indefatigable
quote:
I think you're underestimating the impact of a doctor sitting up there and testifying that the physical trauma cannot be conclusively tied to the events in the back of the car.
Can’t wait to see Dr Plantz testify.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:03 pm to The Boat
quote:
Can’t wait to see Dr Plantz testify.
The prosecution's doctor will have to admit that.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:35 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
To authenticate the video
You just have a technological expert verify time and date the video came on and off the phones hard drive. Don’t need carver.
This post was edited on 3/13/24 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:52 pm to The Boat
quote:
I don’t get what this has to do with anything. Sluts can still be raped.
IMO it is theoretically impossible at this point to convict any of these fellows beyond a reasonable doubt.
I'm not sure if that's what the jury's standard is in this case, but if it is, the prosecutor will lose (especially if they need a unanimous verdict in Baton Rouge).
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:54 pm to redstickrick
Any chance this trial will be televised?
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:54 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Carver reportedly claimed, “These guys are crazy. They finna rape her,”
I know this is hard for some to understand, but it's a white trash thug trying to talk like he's on a Worldstar video. Does he really mean "rape" in the sense of illegal nonconsensual sex, or does he simply mean they are about to frick her?
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:54 pm to SirWinston
I disagree here. A jury will be super swayed by what these dudes did to her…
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:56 pm to SirWinston
quote:
IMO it is theoretically impossible at this point to convict any of these fellows beyond a reasonable doubt.
I'm not sure if that's what the jury's standard is in this case,
You are correct. All criminal convictions must be beyond a reasonable doubt.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:58 pm to The Boat
quote:
jurors aren’t going to get distracted by that.
Go to your local WalMart. Walk around and talk to a few people. Then acknowledge that's your jury and tell me if you still believe that.
This post was edited on 3/13/24 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:00 pm to Commandeaux
quote:
Madison Brooks had sex the day before incident that caused that caused injuries
"I'll take What Had Happened Was for $200, Alex".

Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
This case is different slo.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:04 pm to redstickrick
quote:
You just have a technological expert verify time and date the video came on and off the phones hard drive. Don’t need carver.
Makes sense.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:08 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
know this is hard for some to understand, but it's a white trash thug trying to talk like he's on a Worldstar video. Does he really mean "rape" in the sense of illegal nonconsensual sex, or does he simply mean they are about to . . . ?
Well, how much knowledge of Washington's previous misconduct do you think he had? He basically took a rabid dog to a kid's park.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:11 pm to dukke v
quote:
This case is different slo.
The population of EBR that is emotionally inflamed by this case are not going to be on the jury.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:13 pm to AlwysATgr
Agreed. He was a predator… he has been charged with raping a 14 year old….. before this ever happened.
Popular
Back to top



1






