Started By
Message

re: Alabama cops shoots man exiting his vehicle with his wallet

Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:53 am to
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
83731 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:53 am to
quote:

You think the odds of his being shot inside the car are the same as his exiting the vehicle?
considering that there are instances where people have been shot in the vehicle bc the cop supposedly feared for his life and all...
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:53 am to
I'm saying that the evidence available can be shown to support the officers claim that he feared for his life because he did not know what the victim had in his hand.

It's not a strong case. But it appears to be stronger than the alternative. I'm not arguing that it was a good decision. I'm arguing that it's reasonable to assume that it's the reason he shot the man.
Posted by Dam Guide
Member since Sep 2005
16731 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:53 am to
Why wasn't the truck driver who was out of his car not shot as well? I mean if getting out of your car when the responding officer arrives means you should be treated as a criminal, he should of shot both.
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:54 am to
quote:

Because I don't think he should have stayed in his car.


You think the odds of his being shot inside the car are the same as his exiting the vehicle?


the truck driver was outside of his vehicle right?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112854 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:54 am to
quote:

I'm saying that the evidence available can be shown to support the officers claim that he feared for his life because he did not know what the victim had in his hand.

All true. But once you add the term "reasonably" I do not agree.

This post was edited on 3/13/17 at 11:55 am
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:54 am to
quote:

I thought OJ was not innocent and I think the cop was not justified to shoot the guy, so yea, lots of similarities.



If you think OJ Simpson murdering two people and getting off for political reasons are the same as this then so be it.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
31668 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:54 am to
quote:

I like the fact that you think its completely okay to have "dumb cops" that will just randomly shoot people


So many people die, get injured, and suffer property damage from just normal bad drivers on the road each year. Should we revoke some driving priveledges?

This cop should lose his job.
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:55 am to
quote:

the truck driver was outside of his vehicle right?




He was outside of the vehicle with no objects (as far as I can tell) in his hand when the officer arrived on the scene.
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
40186 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:55 am to
Go die again
Posted by elposter
Member since Dec 2010
26700 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:56 am to
quote:

you saw the3 horror in the truck driver's face when he realized the cop was shooting? Then he held his hands up too.


Would be interesting to hear the truck driver's testimony at trial as a witness to this.
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:56 am to
quote:

All true. But once you add the term "reasonably" I do not agree.



Reasonably doesn't apply to our perception of reason. It only need apply to his ability to reason given the circumstances.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
70025 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:56 am to
quote:

that doesn't mean he's absolved from potential criminal liability


does the courts decision absolve him of potential criminal liability?
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:56 am to
quote:

He was outside of the vehicle with no objects (as far as I can tell) in his hand when the officer arrived on the scene.

sir you said he should have remained in his vehicle
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:57 am to
quote:

does the courts decision absolve him of potential criminal liability?


Absolve? No. But the likelihood of him being charged by the DA after being held justified in civil court is exactly 0.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
66097 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:58 am to
quote:


Why wasn't the truck driver who was out of his car not shot as well? I mean if getting out of your car when the responding officer arrives means you should be treated as a criminal, he should of shot both.


maybe that who the cop was aiming for.

Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:58 am to
quote:

sir you said he should have remained in his vehicle




Yes. It would have been better had all parties been in their vehicles.

I also think it would have been better if he had been outside of the vehicle with his hands visible when the officer arrived. It's an unfortunate set of circumstances that led to the man being shot.
Posted by OKellsBells
USA
Member since Dec 2016
5264 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:58 am to
Levar Jones shot when asked to show his license

I think you just want to argue. Let's see you justify this one, pecker.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
172004 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:58 am to
quote:

quote:
For the last three years, Davidson was hoping to seek justice against the man who shot him for no reason. However, as is the case in so many other police shootings, the shooting was found to be justified — because the cop expressed a justifiable reason to fear for his life.

“The City, the Chief of Police and its officer have always denied any wrongdoing,” a statement from the City of Opelika in response to the most recent court ruling read. “This case has now been analyzed by two federal courts … The judges have unanimously determined after a review of the evidence, which includes the dash cam video, there was no wrongdoing on behalf of the City, the Chief, or the involved officer. In reaching their respective decisions, these Federal Courts reviewed all of the evidence. Their opinions are clearly supported by all evidence.”


That's just pathetic. frick that cop and the shitty courts that ruled it justified.
Posted by Cap Crunch
Fire Alleva
Member since Dec 2010
54189 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Pecker

Still trolling this thread 25 pages in? That's impressive
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112854 posts
Posted on 3/13/17 at 11:59 am to
quote:

It only need apply to his ability to reason
I doubt his "ability to reason" matters, only whether it was actually reasonable.
Jump to page
Page First 23 24 25 26 27 ... 31
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 25 of 31Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram