Started By
Message

re: 63 banks on the brink of insolvency according to the FDIC

Posted on 6/4/24 at 10:38 am to
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
119867 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 10:38 am to
quote:


Let it fail.

People need hard lessons.


Honestly, this is what needs to happen. The government needs to stop bailing people out. Just let it all crash. This country needs a gut check. You know that whole saying, "hard times makes strong men, strong men make easy times, easy times make weak men... or however it goes. If we are talking long term, we need hard times.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
119310 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 10:39 am to
You voted for Biden and live off disability payments
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
24319 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 10:41 am to
Just a friendly reminder in case it slipped your mind...

Posted by AlwaysPutsSeatDown
Member since May 2008
1062 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 10:47 am to
WOW someone on this board understands this issue!!!
Posted by Sterling Archer
Member since Aug 2012
8192 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 10:49 am to
Where's the list?
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16282 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 10:55 am to
quote:

The government needs to stop bailing people out.

You think letting people lose faith in the American banking system would be a good thing?
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
16242 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 11:12 am to
quote:

If the economists are correct and we are about to experience falling interest rates over the next few years



The economists are not correct
Posted by PUB
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
20594 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 11:21 am to
Yellen messed up when al the long-term debt was not "refinanced" when rates were at an all time low.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
92565 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 11:22 am to
Jaime Dimon finna eat
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
26757 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 11:53 am to
That’s not that many considering how much exposure regional banks have in the CRE space.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133389 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Yellen messed up when al the long-term debt was not "refinanced" when rates were at an all time low.
Please elaborate. Thanks.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
40125 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 12:22 pm to
Yeah this is a big nothing burger. What other industries are 98 perfect plus of participants considered not at risk of failure?
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
38198 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 12:26 pm to
One day - ONE DAY - Stout will get the meltdown and chaos he so richly craves!
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
178952 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 12:42 pm to
Dude, I put in the OP that the FDIC said this was within normal scope. If I wanted to be doom and gloom about this wouldn't I leave that part out?






Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133389 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

If the economists are correct and we are about to experience falling interest rates over the next few years

The economists are not correct
Maybe, but long term rates have already dropped significantly over the last 6 months.

The 10-yr Treasury yield last October was 5.02% and today that rate is 4.34%.

Average rates for 30-yr fixed rate mortgages were 7.76% last November and today the average rate is 7.16% according to Bankrate.com.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
178952 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 12:54 pm to
Rates have dropped but remember the Fed indicated at least 3 rate cuts this year. Do you still see that happening?
Posted by Dadren
Jawja
Member since Dec 2023
2987 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

FDIC reports that 63 banks are on the brink of insolvency

Thats really not that many considering the fact there are over 4000 federally chartered commercial banks in the country.

EDIT: Russian beat me on that point.
quote:

The US banking system faces $517 billion in unrealized losses, primarily due to higher mortgage rates affecting residential mortgage-backed securities.

That does sound like a lot, but probably also isn’t that big of a deal…they’re unrealized losses, meaning they only record a loss if they sell.
This post was edited on 6/4/24 at 1:28 pm
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
72557 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Well, which ones are they?
First Bank of Bawcomville, for one.
Posted by hubreb
Member since Nov 2008
2062 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 1:09 pm to
The unrealized losses in bank's securities portfolios talking point is way overhyped and meaningless. The only portion of a bank's balance sheet that is marked to market is the bond portfolio. If you were to mark the liability side of the balance sheet (checking accounts, savings accounts, CDs, etc.) they would have huge gains a they are typically longer than the average term on bond portfolios -- also, bond portfolios on average only make up 20% of the balance sheet. Bank's actually do this internally and for the regulators and it creates Present Value of Equity calculation which is then stressed in multiple rate scenarios. If that gets out of whack then there could be issues -- but highly unlikely because it is tracked on a monthly or quarterly basis depending on size of the bank
Posted by Dixie2023
Member since Mar 2023
4544 posts
Posted on 6/4/24 at 1:15 pm to
As long as I don’t lose the retirement I’ve worked for. Maybe those weak folks taxpayers have to uphold should go strong or not exist.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram