- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 56% of women in the USA ages 18–29 have at least one tattoo.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 3:44 pm to SuperSaint
Posted on 7/19/26 at 3:44 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
remember when you took in an illegal alien border jumper and made her your girlfriend. Then moved her family of illegals in with you?
Link? Yeah…no.
At this point, after years of limply following me like a puppy from thread to thread , you have become less of a a critic and more of a fanboy. You spend more time thinking about me that I spend thinking about me.
#Fanboy #Obsessed #Stalker
1
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:10 pm to Lsupimp
I think there's a difference in the type of tattoo. If a woman gets one or two small tattoos and they are in areas (such as the shoulder) that are easy to conceal, that's one thing. Especially if they got it when they were in high school or college, as you can chalk it up to simply a young dumb decision.
But the women who get full arm tattoos or tattoos that are way too big to conceal at all, those are women to avoid. If a woman has any type of face or neck tattoo, that's a woman who doesn't know how to make anything but a bad decision on anything.
But yes I'm surprised it's only 56%, Like others have said, I think it you move that to the 25 - 30 age range, it's easily 70% of women who have at least one tattoo. And as others have said, service industry, close to 100%.
Anything I'm at a bar in New Orleans, I don't think I've ever seen one woman bartender who doesn't have at least one tattoo. They usually have several.
But the women who get full arm tattoos or tattoos that are way too big to conceal at all, those are women to avoid. If a woman has any type of face or neck tattoo, that's a woman who doesn't know how to make anything but a bad decision on anything.
But yes I'm surprised it's only 56%, Like others have said, I think it you move that to the 25 - 30 age range, it's easily 70% of women who have at least one tattoo. And as others have said, service industry, close to 100%.
Anything I'm at a bar in New Orleans, I don't think I've ever seen one woman bartender who doesn't have at least one tattoo. They usually have several.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:10 pm to ZZTOP
Lovely, ain't it
Like the guy said.. fat ladies with tatoos was once a trip to the circus
Like the guy said.. fat ladies with tatoos was once a trip to the circus
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:18 pm to ZZTOP
The orc-ing of humanity continues.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:22 pm to Upperdecker
quote:
I’ll side with the women on this one, most men in the same generation are equally losers in one way or another. Many still living with their parents, addicted to porn, fat and also covered in tats, and unemployed or underemployed
In general, if you’re a young person with your shite mildly together, it’s never been easier to shoot fish in a barrel
The dating topic is where IMO this board really shows it's age. Yes back in the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, even early 2000s, if you were a guy who mildly had your shite together, you could get a woman. I still don't think many men who are 50 and over genuinely understand how much online dating and #MeToo changed that. Most on here were probably well out of the dating scene before both events.
#MeToo made online dating the default. If you try to ask a woman out in person, you are flat out risking a harassment charge or to be a part of the next viral TikTok or YouTube video. Sure a woman could say yes, if you're in the upper 20%, but it's a much bigger risk than it was even 15 years ago.
Online dating has made it where 3, 4, 5 women absolutely expect to land an 8, 9 or 10 guy (preferably 9 or 10). Before online dating, people genuinely dated in their range attractiveness wise, online dating completely screwed that up.
As to why more women are having sex than men, that's easy, the top men have the market cornered.
I have a real life example of this with one of my best friends, who is a woman. She dated this guy and started to fall for him. He was in a high end career, had the house, sports car, boat, all of that and was attractive. Well, my friend found out that he was seriously dating 5 women in 5 different cities and playing them all. And that besides those 5 women, he was having sex with other women weekly.
Men like that can essentially take 5 - 10 women off the dating market at least temporarily. Then you have more and more women going the lesbian route. Even one lesbian couple, for example, takes two women out of the dating market.
If you meet the following qualifications, getting a woman has never been easier:
- Minimum of 6 feet tall
- Minimum $150,000/year salary
- 9 or 10 level attractiveness. Essentially near model or movie star level looks.
These men above can essentially have sex with a different woman every night of the week. And with women wanting more casual sex than actual relationships, these top 20% men are able to corner the market.
But if you're in the bottom 80% of men, you are invisible to women in the dating market. Maybe you can find and date a 1, 2, 3 level woman, but then you are severely settling. And for a lot of guys who are in the bottom 80%, what you have available just isn't worth the effort a lot of time. Most guys who are a 6 or a 7 for example, are simply not going to settle for a 1, 2, 3 woman and they shouldn't have to. That's why you see so many guys just simply giving up and living their life by themselves and on their terms.
At the end of the day, women were told to "never settle" and they use that as cover to have insane standards. So many women thinking dating a man at their own level is "settling". But there's a difference in "not settling" and having reasonable standards. Most women under 40 now simply no longer have reasonable standards when it comes to dating.
This post was edited on 7/19/26 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:27 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
Women over 50 continue to be lovely and feminine and natural. Glad that's my dating pool. I find them to be comfortable in their own skin.
First time I've ever heard a man describe menopausal women in their 50's as lovely and feminine.
They usually use terms like "bat shite crazy".
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:29 pm to ZZTOP
quote:She's a ad hominem monkey. It's all she knows.
Where in the hell did I say I was struggling to find a girl in the 44%?
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:33 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
Then why are you struggling to find a girlfriend in one of the 44%?
There’s always been a pool of desirable people that is smaller than what is actually available.
Belle this isn't the "own" you think it is or want it to be.
Out of that 44%, how many are batshite crazy, very liberal or lesbian? That takes out a lot. Out of that 44%, considering no tattoos is more attractive for men, how many of those women are even available?
The fact is, it's hard for men who don't want to date a woman with a tattoo, as you instantly removed, based on this article, at least 56% of the female population. And honestly, I think that's on the conservative side. From my experience I would say it's closer to 70%. Add in the other factors and it can leave not a lot of women who are really dating and/or wife material.
This post was edited on 7/19/26 at 5:37 pm
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:35 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
Is there some reason you can’t pull someone from the 44% that doesn’t have one?
You seem defensive.
Are you fat? Do you have a tattoo? High body count?
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:36 pm to ZZTOP
I see all these teenagers and early 20-something kids with tattoos and just wonder…”Where the hell did you get the money for that?” Those things usually aren’t cheap. And they all complain they have no money and can’t afford things, but can afford something frivolous like a tattoo.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:36 pm to moneyg
quote:
You seem defensive. Are you fat? Do you have a tattoo? High body count?
No.
I am getting married in October. I’m doing fine.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:43 pm to TheMagicMan
I’m old AF- I’ve never been anywhere near as popular with women as I am now. Not 30 years ago , not five years ago but right now. It’s an embarrassment of riches. If you are reasonably attractive and intelligent, actually admire women and are a good communicator and listener you can bat so far over your average- it’s crazy. At some point in your 50’s the advantage flips back to men. Not exactly sure why.
I freaking LOVE LOVE LOVE women. They are generally better in conversation, usually emotionally available, and just more fun to be around. I look back at my relationships and genuinely admire all of them in some significant way. Meanwhile- it’s a freaking HORROR show for under 40. This is one area I am glad to be old.
I freaking LOVE LOVE LOVE women. They are generally better in conversation, usually emotionally available, and just more fun to be around. I look back at my relationships and genuinely admire all of them in some significant way. Meanwhile- it’s a freaking HORROR show for under 40. This is one area I am glad to be old.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:45 pm to Casual
quote:
Statistically speaking, there are probably a few baws in this thread talking about how stupid and undesirable women with tattoos are that have a daughter with multiple tats that they don't know about
Even if true, what is the relevance of this to the thread?
Posted on 7/19/26 at 5:46 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:Just talking down on those with a tattoo as if there’s a direct correlation with them being bad people
Even if true, what is the relevance of this to the thread?
Posted on 7/19/26 at 6:06 pm to ZZTOP
quote:
38% of women have at least one tattoo, compared with 27% of men. This includes 56% of women ages 18 to 29.
Why do women of all ages feel so compelled to get tattoos?
Posted on 7/19/26 at 6:18 pm to Underteaux
quote:No one is saying they're all bad people. They're not a bunch of rapists and murderers.
Just talking down on those with a tattoo as if there’s a direct correlation with them being bad people
They're just low class, trashy, and have poor decision making skills.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 6:18 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
Is there some reason you can’t pull someone from the 44% that doesn’t have one?
Posted on 7/19/26 at 6:32 pm to ZZTOP
Ya just gotta keep the ac low , keep plenty of chocolate around and hide the box wine.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 6:36 pm to WaydownSouth
quote:there isn’t a chance in hell
Guarantee she looks better than whatever hog you get in bed next to at night
Posted on 7/19/26 at 6:40 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Even if true, what is the relevance of this to the thread?
It's a thread about tattoos and statistics. Sorry if I struck a nerve.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News