Started By
Message

re: 1A “auditors” demonetized on YT

Posted on 9/2/26 at 4:10 pm to
Posted by Defenseiskey
Houston, TX
Member since Nov 2010
2470 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 4:10 pm to
And I bet all you "govern me harder daddy" bootlickers have dont tread on me bumper stickers, the irony.
Posted by Stealth Matrix
29°59'55.98"N 90°05'21.85"W
Member since Aug 2019
12183 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

YT just made them martyrs.

Yep.

And a disturbing number here don't see that.
Posted by andwesway
Zachary, LA
Member since Jun 2016
3926 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 4:58 pm to
Those folks are all a bunch of jackasses. They're in par with people who are just "traveling," instead of driving when they get pulled over.
Posted by BobABooey
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2004
16309 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

1A “auditors” demonetized on YT

Well thank goodness I can still make my 2A videos where I open carry in public!
Posted by geauxturbo
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
4505 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

They are trying to agitate people into a conflict so they can make money off it.


Trying is a stretch. The raging idiots seem to find them with little to no work at all. Including the Police with a meth like addiction for ID.
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
17314 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 6:26 pm to
Why do you hate the constitution?
Posted by TigerIron
Member since Feb 2021
4193 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:57 pm to
quote:



You cannot break the law just because someone is annoying.


no, but if someone goes around being an a-hole for clicks and clout, it breaks no law to not reward them for it and put them in a memory hole. Many of these "auditors" aren't even filming officers, they're just agitating strangers.

There's a big gap between what's legal to do and what's socially desirable to do and if there's a way to not normalize people filming other people to antagonize them for internet content I am in full support of it.
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
15461 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

If ignorant people didn't freak out on the auditors they wouldn't have any content or viewers to worry about.


I don’t blame anyone for freaking out because some goon is a mask is harassing them outside a post office
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
9041 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:02 pm to
Good. I hate the people who think it’s right to film people going about their day.
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
15461 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

And I bet all you "govern me harder daddy" bootlickers have dont tread on me bumper stickers, the irony.


I was today years old when I learned YouTube is a government entity.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
72272 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:06 pm to
Those pussy farts should go audit the ghetto. I hear those folks have a real problem with your 1st amendment right to disrespect random citizens.

But they wont, because they hoover dick like it's an extinct delicacy and just want the attention daddy didn't give them.
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 8:08 pm
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
51679 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:12 pm to
what in the cornbread frick are you talking about
Posted by SixthAndBarone
Member since Jan 2019
11460 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

There's a big gap between what's legal to do and what's socially desirable to do and if there's a way to not normalize people filming other people to antagonize them for internet content I am in full support of it.


Most people on YouTube aren’t doing normal things, bro. Imagine how boring YouTube would be if everyone was normal.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
72272 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:17 pm to
I didn't realize we had a crew on here supporting these low lifes.

I guess the new OT continues to evolve in a surprising way.
Posted by AndyCBR
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2012
8446 posts
Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:51 pm to
quote:


I didn't realize we had a crew on here supporting these low lifes.

I guess the new OT continues to evolve in a surprising way.


I won't pretend to speak for everybody in the thread.

But free speech does not just apply to speech people find favorable. It is supposed to protect even the speech some may find vile or objectionable.

Once you head down the slippery slope of saying some speech is "OK" and some speech is "illegal", you no longer have the freedoms that our republic was founded on.

This is a pretty simple concept that our Republic was founded upon and I am curious why so many people here have trouble with the concept.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram