
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/2/26 at 4:11 pm to Salmon
quote:
YT just made them martyrs.
Yep.
And a disturbing number here don't see that.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 4:58 pm to Teauxler
Those folks are all a bunch of jackasses. They're in par with people who are just "traveling," instead of driving when they get pulled over.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 5:14 pm to Teauxler
quote:
1A “auditors” demonetized on YT
Well thank goodness I can still make my 2A videos where I open carry in public!
Posted on 9/2/26 at 6:24 pm to dupergreenie
quote:
They are trying to agitate people into a conflict so they can make money off it.
Trying is a stretch. The raging idiots seem to find them with little to no work at all. Including the Police with a meth like addiction for ID.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 6:26 pm to Teauxler
Why do you hate the constitution?
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:57 pm to SixthAndBarone
quote:
You cannot break the law just because someone is annoying.
no, but if someone goes around being an a-hole for clicks and clout, it breaks no law to not reward them for it and put them in a memory hole. Many of these "auditors" aren't even filming officers, they're just agitating strangers.
There's a big gap between what's legal to do and what's socially desirable to do and if there's a way to not normalize people filming other people to antagonize them for internet content I am in full support of it.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:59 pm to wheelr
quote:
If ignorant people didn't freak out on the auditors they wouldn't have any content or viewers to worry about.
I don’t blame anyone for freaking out because some goon is a mask is harassing them outside a post office
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:02 pm to Teauxler
Good. I hate the people who think it’s right to film people going about their day.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:04 pm to Defenseiskey
quote:
And I bet all you "govern me harder daddy" bootlickers have dont tread on me bumper stickers, the irony.
I was today years old when I learned YouTube is a government entity.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:06 pm to HagaDaga
Those pussy farts should go audit the ghetto. I hear those folks have a real problem with your 1st amendment right to disrespect random citizens.
But they wont, because they hoover dick like it's an extinct delicacy and just want the attention daddy didn't give them.
But they wont, because they hoover dick like it's an extinct delicacy and just want the attention daddy didn't give them.
This post was edited on 9/2/26 at 8:08 pm
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:12 pm to Teauxler
what in the cornbread frick are you talking about
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:15 pm to TigerIron
quote:
There's a big gap between what's legal to do and what's socially desirable to do and if there's a way to not normalize people filming other people to antagonize them for internet content I am in full support of it.
Most people on YouTube aren’t doing normal things, bro. Imagine how boring YouTube would be if everyone was normal.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 8:17 pm to SixthAndBarone
I didn't realize we had a crew on here supporting these low lifes.
I guess the new OT continues to evolve in a surprising way.
I guess the new OT continues to evolve in a surprising way.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:51 pm to GRTiger
quote:
I didn't realize we had a crew on here supporting these low lifes.
I guess the new OT continues to evolve in a surprising way.
I won't pretend to speak for everybody in the thread.
But free speech does not just apply to speech people find favorable. It is supposed to protect even the speech some may find vile or objectionable.
Once you head down the slippery slope of saying some speech is "OK" and some speech is "illegal", you no longer have the freedoms that our republic was founded on.
This is a pretty simple concept that our Republic was founded upon and I am curious why so many people here have trouble with the concept.

Popular
Back to top

1










