Started By
Message

re: Saints to sign former 1st RD S Jonathan Abram

Posted on 3/21/23 at 10:06 pm to
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
7913 posts
Posted on 3/21/23 at 10:06 pm to
Not a lost cause. Had some unfortunate injuries that derailed his positive momentum. Also, was on a joke franchise. Dude was very talented at one point. He brings the wood and the energy. Let’s see if he’s healthy before we write him off.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
77177 posts
Posted on 3/21/23 at 10:07 pm to
Lol
Posted by Zzyzx
Member since Nov 2018
2706 posts
Posted on 3/21/23 at 10:23 pm to
Yikes the worst safety in the NFL bar none, maybe move him to LB?
Posted by A Menace to Sobriety
Member since Jun 2018
32825 posts
Posted on 3/21/23 at 10:37 pm to
Why are yall melting? Like why? At best he's our 3rd safety. Not expensive and maybe we'll catch lightning in a bottle with him.
Posted by VictoryHill
Watson, LA
Member since Nov 2013
3261 posts
Posted on 3/21/23 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

It’s a minimum deal but shite signing

It being a minimum deal doesn’t make it not a shite signing because he’s still a shite player, lil guy. Logic not your strong suit?
Posted by bstaceyau19
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2022
1603 posts
Posted on 3/21/23 at 10:57 pm to
Here is the mentality that leads to these kinds of posts:

1. Every free agent signing is THE key ingredient to bringing a guaranteed Super Bowl win.

2. Every free agent loss turns a sure Super Bowl into a sure #1 overall pick for the next season.

3. Therefore, every free agent signing that is definitely not the key ingredient to the Super Bowl is a bad signing that will lead to the #1 overall pick next season.

Way too many people think like this.
Posted by VictoryHill
Watson, LA
Member since Nov 2013
3261 posts
Posted on 3/21/23 at 11:21 pm to
Wrong.

Typically good winning franchises sign good players, not DB’s who can’t cover and will do nothing to improve the backend and don’t create turnovers when we were a bottom 3 team in that category last year. It has nothing to do with the cap which I don’t give a frick about, or the contract.

Abrams is a bad pro player. Therefore he’s a bad signing.
Posted by Stamps74
Member since Nov 2017
1682 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 5:19 am to
quote:

It's crazy that Mayock goes right back to being a draft expert without missing a beat.


Word was Gruden picked all first round picks, then let mayock take over rest of draft
Posted by Doug_H
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2013
2775 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 6:12 am to
[quote]Typically good winning franchises sign good players, not DB’s who can’t cover and will do nothing to improve the backend and don’t create turnovers when we were a bottom 3 team in that category last year. It has nothing to do with the cap which I don’t give a frick about, or the contract.

Abrams is a bad pro player. Therefore he’s a bad signing.
[/quote]
What you're describing is a Pro Bowl team you arse jockey. No team in the league has 90 studs on their March roster.
This post was edited on 3/22/23 at 6:53 am
Posted by OC Tiger
Charlotte, NC
Member since Feb 2007
1545 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:13 am to
He can tackle, and he can hit. Not to mention he's still young, so you're not dealing with a player who's physically degraded.

For depth, I'll take it.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481226 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:23 am to
quote:

Typically good winning franchises sign good players, not DB’s who can’t cover and will do nothing to improve the backend and don’t create turnovers when we were a bottom 3 team in that category last year. It has nothing to do with the cap which I don’t give a frick about, or the contract.

Abrams is a bad pro player. Therefore he’s a bad signing.


I mean if he is agreeing to only play STs and he never sees the field on defense, it's not so bad.

He may not even make it out of camp.

But yes, if he sees the field on defense, we're fricked.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
17197 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:26 am to
quote:

Wrong.

Typically good winning franchises sign good players, not DB’s who can’t cover and will do nothing to improve the backend and don’t create turnovers when we were a bottom 3 team in that category last year. It has nothing to do with the cap which I don’t give a frick about, or the contract.

Abrams is a bad pro player. Therefore he’s a bad signing.



It's almost like you guys don't even know that teams sign guys to strictly play special teams.

I don't work in the Saints personnel dept, but this signing has special teams written all over it with the ability to play safety if needed. Probably a cheaper version of Justin Evans who was awful last year.

Veteran
Minimum contract
good tackler
hard hitter

Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
77177 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 7:47 am to
quote:

Saints to sign former 1st RD S Jonathan Abram
He’s terrible
Why?


Maybe his former coach saw something. Nothing to lose for us and maybe DA finds a place for him. I had to look up his draft profile:

40-Yard Dash
4.45
Seconds
10-Yard Split
1.48
Seconds
Vertical Jump
33.5’’
Broad Jump
9’ 8’’
3-Cone Drill
--
20-Yd Shuttle
--
Bench Press
16

Total Score
90
2019 Combine S Rank: 1st

Strengths
Stout frame with desired height,weight speed totals
Very tough and very competitive
Intimidating striker
Plays like an extra linebacker

Straight-line speed to close out targets
Alpha demeanor on the field
Upper-body strength for block-shuck-and-tackle finishing
Fiery attitude rubs off on his teammates
Gets feet moving early to help smooth his transitions
Has size and strength to match on tight ends
Possesses adequate short-area athleticism for man coverage underneath
Good communication skills on the backend

Weaknesses
Is a little tightly bundled through the hips
He's not stiff, but he's not necessarily fluid
Unlikely to handle coverage duties on the backend
Moderate ball production
Needs to play with better anticipation in coverage
Uses burst to close on receiver rather than close on football
Will miss some tackles when coming in too hot
Playing style could lend itself to durability concerns
Edgy playing style lacks control at times

Looks like the raiders do not evaluate very well. Seems he may have been forced to play a position he sucks at
Perhaps a Roman Harper type?
This post was edited on 3/22/23 at 7:48 am
Posted by Fububutsy
Lake Charles, LA
Member since Jan 2007
4087 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 9:13 am to
quote:

VictoryHill


At this point this moron has to just be a SFP alter that says the EVEN dumber takes that he doesn’t want under his name. Absolutely a fricking dumbass account.
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
19626 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 9:37 am to
We needed to replace Justin Evans and Daniel Sorensen. Lonnie Johnson and Jonathan Abram are those replacements. If we draft a safety that is better, you let Abram goes.

Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
22273 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 9:48 am to
Must be a slow news day when this is the type of signing that causes people to complain.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
32409 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 9:49 am to
He's 5'11", 205lbs for some of yal who think he's a LBer

Kaden Elliss who ATL poached was 6'3", 238lbs.

Like ^ is saying, he is a justin evans/daniel sorensen replacement. That's fine because those two were definitely not very noteworthy. Could do worse, could do a lot better.

Hopefully this is the latter
Posted by VictoryHill
Watson, LA
Member since Nov 2013
3261 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 10:00 am to
quote:

good tackler

Tell me you know nothing about Abram without telling me.

Dude’s missed like 15% of his career tackles yet has people dick riding him because he wears black and gold now. Can’t make this shite up.
Posted by VictoryHill
Watson, LA
Member since Nov 2013
3261 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 10:02 am to
quote:

Fububutsy

Not seen you around since the last time I laid the smackdown on your candy arse when you were in a masturbatory binge over the Carr signing.
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
36333 posts
Posted on 3/22/23 at 10:04 am to
He’s a depth signing and shouldn’t see the field, but Maye is often hurt and Honey Badger is old and not so great. He will likely see the field at some point on defense. I don’t think he’s a terrible player, but he’s not great either. My issue is his immaturity, his injury history, the fact he was a 1st round pick that was waived before his contract was up and he was then waived by another team.

He may not make the team and May end up being a camp body. It’s just a lot of red flags for a ehh player.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram