- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I see the Saints trading up to 3... Update: McShay does too!...2ND UPDATE: so does DJ!!
Posted on 4/11/26 at 6:57 pm to Handsome Pete
Posted on 4/11/26 at 6:57 pm to Handsome Pete
quote:
Seems word is out the Jets favor Bailey at 2.
Where are you seeing that? Most mocks I’ve seen and podcasts, stories, etc. has the Jets taking Reese at 2. NFL Mock Draft Database
New York Post
quote:
The Jets are projected to take Arvell Reese from Ohio State at No. 2, and they could use him as a hybrid edge rusher/linebacker.
1
Posted on 4/11/26 at 7:07 pm to Handsome Pete
They better fricking not
Posted on 4/11/26 at 8:19 pm to Suntiger
McShay said he’s locking it in for Bailey at #2 based off his sources
Posted on 4/11/26 at 8:27 pm to Handsome Pete
I really hope not. Not a first for Reese. So much talent to be had at 8 . I say they should sit tight and take a stud and keep next years first. I’d be sick if they gave up next years first for Arvell Reese. He may be an absolute monster but he might also be a dud burger like Davenport.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 11:01 pm to Handsome Pete
First, fair value would be 8 overall and our 2nd for 3 overall and their 4th. We aren't trading up to 2 or 1 where the value gets a bit ridiculous.
Second, why would we trade up when the value is better just sitting still?
Second, why would we trade up when the value is better just sitting still?
This post was edited on 4/11/26 at 11:03 pm
Posted on 4/11/26 at 11:33 pm to Handsome Pete
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:05 am to Handsome Pete
quote:
Saints give up 8 and their 2027 1st round pick to move up to 3 for Reese.
Mmm…. That’s a fat NO, you need to get off the kool-aid
Posted on 4/12/26 at 4:39 pm to Dantheman504
quote:
acquire a David Bailey type player who is already a proven NFL talent
I thought I took a nap, but I guess I was actually in a coma. What else did I miss?
Posted on 4/12/26 at 5:29 pm to Bestbank Tiger
Quote: Nah, Loomis doesn't trade up unless it's for a project D lineman.
Agree. Especially if he's from a non-P4 school or has had a major injury.
Agree. Especially if he's from a non-P4 school or has had a major injury.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:13 pm to Handsome Pete
Sarcasm?
Heck no.
Heck no.
This post was edited on 4/12/26 at 9:14 pm
Posted on 4/15/26 at 7:58 pm to Handsome Pete
Just got to point out that Todd McShay is thinkin' what I'm thinkin'
McShay Mock 4.0
Instead of next years 1st, Todd has the Saints giving up this year's and next year's 2nd rounders to move up to pick 3 for Reese.
McShay Mock 4.0
Instead of next years 1st, Todd has the Saints giving up this year's and next year's 2nd rounders to move up to pick 3 for Reese.
This post was edited on 4/15/26 at 7:58 pm
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:01 pm to Handsome Pete
Wonder how much is this because this is what McShay believes will happen from his connections, or is it because he knows Loomis is aggressive and he’s just taking a chance to say he called it.
Also makes me wonder if he has some leaks with AZ and this “guess” came about because Mickey was doing his usual let me call everyone above us to see what it may take to move up.
Also makes me wonder if he has some leaks with AZ and this “guess” came about because Mickey was doing his usual let me call everyone above us to see what it may take to move up.
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:07 pm to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
Wonder how much is this because this is what McShay believes will happen from his connections, or is it because he knows Loomis is aggressive and he’s just taking a chance to say he called it. Also makes me wonder if he has some leaks with AZ and this “guess” came about because Mickey was doing his usual let me call everyone above us to see what it may take to move up.
He said it’s 2 things
1. He knows Arizona is desperate to trade back
2. Mickey has a history of trading up to get his guy
No actual intel
Posted on 4/15/26 at 9:35 pm to Handsome Pete
quote:
Instead of next years 1st, Todd has the Saints giving up this year's and next year's 2nd rounders to move up to pick 3 for Reese.
And it would be idiotic. This team is far from one player away so why make a trade up like that?
This team needs those second rounders.
This post was edited on 4/15/26 at 9:48 pm
Posted on 4/15/26 at 10:18 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
And it would be idiotic
Posted on 4/16/26 at 12:17 pm to Weekend Warrior79
quote:With no QBs or generational talents at edge or OT available, I think the price to move up within the top 10 will be significantly less than most years. I wouldn't be surprised if the Saints could move from 8 to 3 for just our 2nd round pick. The Cardinals need a right tackle and may draft one at 3 anyway - why not move back to 8, get the same RT plus another starter with our 2nd round pick? Cleveland also needs OL and would like to move back, though a move from 6 to 8 for a 4th or something may not be worth their while. Maybe we could throw Cesar Ruiz at them.
Instead of next years 1st, Todd has the Saints giving up this year's and next year's 2nd rounders to move up to pick 3 for Reese.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 11:57 pm to Mpd31
No, No, No! Stickpile as many picks as possible over the next 3-4 drafts. We should have been doing this for the last 3 drafts. Super Bowl winners are the teams with the most draft picks the previous 5 years.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 10:08 am to Lou Loomis
I am not saying we should trade up for him, but it seems multiple teams are trying to trade back, so there is a deal to be had. Also, if you think Reese is the next Parsons, you just go up and get him and worry about the rest later.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 12:19 pm to Handsome Pete
No, hope not. Still too many holes to fill. We can get cute and trade up to draft LBs once we have a legit NFL roster. More "best man available" should be the approach this year.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 12:24 pm to Lsujacket66
quote:
He said it’s 2 things
1. He knows Arizona is desperate to trade back
2. Mickey has a history of trading up to get his guy
Mickey has a history of trading up an average pick of #27. We don't trade up Top 10 picks. Are we drafting 27th? This holds absolutely no weight at all. We were contenders for 15 years drafting towards the end of the draft.
This post was edited on 4/20/26 at 12:28 pm
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News