- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
bonethug0180
| Favorite team: | New Orleans Saints |
| Location: | Avondale |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 4938 |
| Registered on: | 7/31/2018 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: How many of you are hoping we lose Sunday?
Posted by bonethug0180 on 1/3/26 at 7:27 am to carrguitar
frick losing. That's a bitch arse mentality.
Yes, IF we lose there is a silver lining to it. Great. But wanting to lose for that silver lining is pussy arse loser shite.
So yeah still frick anyone who wants us to lose.
Yes, IF we lose there is a silver lining to it. Great. But wanting to lose for that silver lining is pussy arse loser shite.
So yeah still frick anyone who wants us to lose.
re: How many of you are hoping we lose Sunday?
Posted by bonethug0180 on 1/1/26 at 10:42 pm to LSUlefty
frick you if you want/hope to lose.
re: Where does our 2025 draft class rank? 4 Saints make ESPN’s 2025 NFL All-Rookie 1st team
Posted by bonethug0180 on 1/1/26 at 2:55 pm to Weekend Warrior79
Also, how the frick are they using sacks as a measuring tool of how good the qbs are? I get it if they are standing back there all day and taking sacks, but that's why the numbers need context and not just be taken in a vacuum. The majority of the sacks Shough has taken come from immediate pressure. Like 1 second from the snap.
re: Do You wish we would have kept Shaheed now?
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/30/25 at 12:05 am to Townedrunkard
$25 mil per seems pretty absurd, if that's what people were saying, but $16 mil per easy was what he was on track for before the trade, maybe up to $20 mil per if he got better with Shough (which he was on track to do if you look at the game logs).
He won't get less than $12 mil per even with the huge downturn in Seattle, unless this is a loaded WR class (I haven't looked at that yet).
He won't get less than $12 mil per even with the huge downturn in Seattle, unless this is a loaded WR class (I haven't looked at that yet).
re: Dumb hypothetical: for one game only, steal one Bucs player to help us beat the Falcons
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/29/25 at 10:52 pm to THRILLHO
Either Guard.
re: Do You wish we would have kept Shaheed now?
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/29/25 at 10:22 pm to TechDawg2007
At the pace he was on for us in a contract year, it would have cost us quite a bit to retain him. And while I really like him, the option was really deciding to pay a more consistent Olave or the more boom or bust Shaheed.
We definitely need to look for another game breaker like him now, but at a more cost effective price.
Now if he had been performing like he has since going to the Seahawks, that price might have been a bit more reasonable.
We definitely need to look for another game breaker like him now, but at a more cost effective price.
Now if he had been performing like he has since going to the Seahawks, that price might have been a bit more reasonable.
re: What say you. The Saints make the playoffs next year, Yes or No. Vote
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/25/25 at 8:49 pm to PSS101
Only need to win the division to reach the playoffs, and this division is EXTREMELY winnable, so I say yes we have a very good shot at making the playoffs and I think we will win this division next year.
re: Shough goes #1 in Todd McShay’s 2025 redraft
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/25/25 at 5:30 pm to thenza
9th since 2000 in fact, with only the Pats, Steelers, Packers, Eagles, Ravens, Colts, Chiefs, and Seahawks ahead of us.
Team wins since 2000.
Team wins since 2000.
re: Shough goes #1 in Todd McShay’s 2025 redraft
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/25/25 at 10:25 am to NIH
Right? Complain about not having cap but be pissed we didn't go get a guy that was going to cost mega cap. xD
re: Shough goes #1 in Todd McShay’s 2025 redraft
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/25/25 at 10:23 am to NIH
quote:100%
Some of you are such queens. The Saints had a winning season as recently as 2023. Ask the Jets, Giants, Raiders, Cardinals, Dolphins, etc. about poor management. Loomis’s biggest mistake was hiring DA and thinking we were on the cusp of something after 2021.
It's like some of these idiots didn't become fans until we won the SB, and expect that we should be winning one every year and if we don't the season was the worst ever.
Even with how horrible Allen is and the injuries we had, we still somehow had winning seasons even with him.
2024 was the first time since 2005 (Katrina season) with fewer than 7 wins, which was only the second time since 2000, and Loomis was here during that entire period.
re: Shough goes #1 in Todd McShay’s 2025 redraft
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/25/25 at 10:18 am to Townedrunkard
quote:This is not true at all. We can clear upwards of $60+ mil in 2026 if we want, and even more in 2027.
Still hamstrung by the cap for at least two more years
re: Shough goes #1 in Todd McShay’s 2025 redraft
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/25/25 at 10:16 am to moock blackjack
quote:Loomis has presided over the most successful stint the Saints have had in their history by FAAAAAAAAAAAAAR.
Loomis has destroyed this franchise
re: Shough goes #1 in Todd McShay’s 2025 redraft
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/25/25 at 10:14 am to Sunnyvale
quote:So Payton was solely responsible for all the horrible drafts we had after that as well?
It was all Payton
re: Can Shough be the heir apparent to Derek Carr? Mel Kiper’s 2025 Saints draft grade
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/24/25 at 10:07 pm to lacajun069
quote:These guys aren't so bad, but man Mayock before he became a GM was so fricking money on his takes. I was sad to see him leave because he was one of the few who was actually extremely knowledgeable and not taking money from the agents to push certain players (which you could tell by the way he harped on many guys not on most "experts" radar and the fact that there wasn't any common agents threads amongst the players he talked about).
McShay, Jeremiah, Brooks
re: Can Shough be the heir apparent to Derek Carr? Mel Kiper’s 2025 Saints draft grade
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/24/25 at 10:03 pm to Handsome Pete
quote:No he doesn't. They have people that track these guys and he actually is quite literally around the bottom.
Kiper gets it right as much as any of the other draft analysts
re: Can Shough be the heir apparent to Derek Carr? Mel Kiper’s 2025 Saints draft grade
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/24/25 at 10:02 pm to Flavius Belisarius
Kiper is and has been the biggest idiot of all those draft "expert" idiots. Dude is a fan that does not know the game like someone who has actually been in it does.
He goes off of hope and word of mouth (which around draft time is filled with lies to throw people off) more than anything the player has actually done.
Iirc, he killed us for Michael Thomas (who yes had injuries and went off the deep end, but that's not why he hated Thomas) and that immediately proved to be an idiotic take. I mean I can point to most of our picks and he practically hates the vast majority every year.
Not to mention he is paid to push certain players by certain agents (same as many of these "experts"), so all the more reason not to pay attention to their propaganda bs.
There are so very few actually knowledgeable AND unbiased people that do draft stuff these days. Most are idiots that don't really know the game, on the take, or both.
He goes off of hope and word of mouth (which around draft time is filled with lies to throw people off) more than anything the player has actually done.
Iirc, he killed us for Michael Thomas (who yes had injuries and went off the deep end, but that's not why he hated Thomas) and that immediately proved to be an idiotic take. I mean I can point to most of our picks and he practically hates the vast majority every year.
Not to mention he is paid to push certain players by certain agents (same as many of these "experts"), so all the more reason not to pay attention to their propaganda bs.
There are so very few actually knowledgeable AND unbiased people that do draft stuff these days. Most are idiots that don't really know the game, on the take, or both.
re: Football Digest: The NFL's best rookie quarterback is an afterthought
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/24/25 at 6:11 pm to goatmilker
Based on preseason, no. Shough was showing things in preseason that he clearly had more potential than Rattler.
Now I do agree with the argument that Rattler was more ready to run the offense, but he was never more capable than Shough at any point.
Sure Shough would have had struggles starting out, but he would have also learned and adjusted at an accelerated rate compared to sitting. He isn't some 22 year old that has a lot to learn still about playing QB itself, nor would he lose confidence. This is why I HATE the silly argument that playing him immediately would have set him back. It would have done the opposite.
So I do believe Moore truly thought someone that knew the offense better would make us more competitive than choosing the obviously more capable player, but I don't agree that it was the right call and time proved that out once Shough proved he knew the offense and Rattler showed his limitations far too often.
Now I do agree with the argument that Rattler was more ready to run the offense, but he was never more capable than Shough at any point.
Sure Shough would have had struggles starting out, but he would have also learned and adjusted at an accelerated rate compared to sitting. He isn't some 22 year old that has a lot to learn still about playing QB itself, nor would he lose confidence. This is why I HATE the silly argument that playing him immediately would have set him back. It would have done the opposite.
So I do believe Moore truly thought someone that knew the offense better would make us more competitive than choosing the obviously more capable player, but I don't agree that it was the right call and time proved that out once Shough proved he knew the offense and Rattler showed his limitations far too often.
re: Does Mickey deserve any credit for where we are headed?
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/22/25 at 3:41 pm to Lester Earl
quote:This was a Payton/Allen failing, because it was said particularly that they didn't know how to fit him in the scheme, which is a great failing of the DC.
They botched the best draft pick in recent years with Zack Baun, which should be a fireable offense in itself.
This was ALWAYS Allen's issue was that he does not bend his scheme to the players, rather he tries to bend the players to his scheme, and gets rid of them if they don't fit.
This is also my biggest issue with Payton and the Ryan thing. Ryan came in and made a scheme to fit the players and we had a top 5 defense a year after having the worst defense ever, then Payton mandated running the Seattle Cover 3, which Ryan neither had familiarity with nor the players to run it. And that was Payton's excuse to bring Allen back because he was a heavy zone guy.
re: Football Digest: The NFL's best rookie quarterback is an afterthought
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/22/25 at 3:28 pm to Proximo
quote:Better players at less important positions. There are certain positions that are at a premium, and FAAAAAAAAAAR above all is the QB.
But Towne still says there were better players on the board
re: Football Digest: The NFL's best rookie quarterback is an afterthought
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/22/25 at 3:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
Just watched this last night as well and I 100% agree with everything he was saying, including people acting stupid over those 2 viral clips (one during a college game with the weird underhanded throw that was picked and the combine one) saying he sucks because of them.
This is why despite him being older and me not thinking going QB in round 2 was a good decision, I came around on him very quickly when I actually went and watched videos (not just highlights or lowlights) of his games on YouTube.
You could immediately see a lot of things that you NEED to be successful in the NFL, and he was doing most of them well. He was definitely "pro ready" from the get go compared to the others (which makes sense with how long he was on college).
This is why I was extremely disappointed with going with Rattler to start the year, because you could see all the limitations that he was/is never likely to get over to become a legit QB. Even if Shough wasn't ready as far as knowing the playbook and whatnot, he isn't so soft-minded that it would have hurt his confidence, and he would be even further along by now (and we likely have 2-3 more wins).
This is why despite him being older and me not thinking going QB in round 2 was a good decision, I came around on him very quickly when I actually went and watched videos (not just highlights or lowlights) of his games on YouTube.
You could immediately see a lot of things that you NEED to be successful in the NFL, and he was doing most of them well. He was definitely "pro ready" from the get go compared to the others (which makes sense with how long he was on college).
This is why I was extremely disappointed with going with Rattler to start the year, because you could see all the limitations that he was/is never likely to get over to become a legit QB. Even if Shough wasn't ready as far as knowing the playbook and whatnot, he isn't so soft-minded that it would have hurt his confidence, and he would be even further along by now (and we likely have 2-3 more wins).
re: Evidence that 3 greats are moving on
Posted by bonethug0180 on 12/22/25 at 3:07 pm to mdomingue
:cheers:
Popular
0












