- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Here are some of pieces the Saints are looking at giving in Watson deal per reporter:
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:14 am to Tigerbait1977
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:14 am to Tigerbait1977
quote:
We must remember that the Saints themselves could get some big time picks in a Sean Payton trade potentially.
Just offer Houston the rights to Payton for Watson, right now.
1
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:15 am to Midget Death Squad
quote:
Ramczyk
Is almost as valuable as Watson. This would be a hard no for me. The rest are all acceptable though.
A top 5 rt is an valuable as a top 5-7 qb.
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:17 am to moneyg
I wonder if they'd value this as a 1st and a 2nd
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:18 am to Weekend Warrior79
I hope we can hold onto onyemata.
I think he is due for another contract after next year though.
I bet it's going to be 2 or 3 firsts, a couple later picks and mccoy, davenport, and another ok player.
I think he is due for another contract after next year though.
I bet it's going to be 2 or 3 firsts, a couple later picks and mccoy, davenport, and another ok player.
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:21 am to Fun Bunch
quote:The issue is that you're giving up a lot of the players that make you good to acquire a QB.
Giving up a guy like Ram or McCoy plus other good players plus 3 1sts would be tough.
BUT, on the other hand, you would have your QB for a long time AND there's the very real possibility that the Cowboys trade for Sean Payton's rights next year and that haul would be enormous, so the Saints would basically have a shite year in 2022 but be able to quickly rebuild in 2023.
This could be a long con...I just hope that of all those guys, Ram is not the one you give up.
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:21 am to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
Nick Underhill
@nick_underhill
·
9m
Circling back to yesterday's conversation. ... Things can always change, especially in a trade situation where offers get exchanged, but I'd be surprised if Ryan Ramczyk is currently involved in discussions.
everybody chill
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:22 am to BilJ
Underhill would know.
It just doesn't make sense financially.
Davenport, McCoy etc make sense financially.
It just doesn't make sense financially.
Davenport, McCoy etc make sense financially.
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:22 am to Laaz2750
quote:
So… three of the players that make the Saints a good destination for a QB? Great…
Two*
Trading Ruiz would be addition by subtraction at this point if he holds trade value
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:28 am to msstate7
quote:
I wonder if they'd value this as a 1st and a 2nd
They know Dallas wants him, and they know it will take a premium to get him. And, Dallas has talent that they are struggling to get under the cap.
I have no idea if trading a coach's contract like that is even possible. But, Houston could probably get more for Dallas than the Saints would be willing to give. And, with Watson holding some cards, they aren't in the strongest position.
It's crazy to me that a team would offer multiple firsts combined with established borderline pro-bowl starters for Watson all things considered.
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:30 am to moneyg
I wonder what Andrew Luck is up to.
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:44 am to Tigerbait1977
You do not give up Ramcyzk, Onyemata or McCoy under any circumstance. If they want 3 first and Ruiz or Davenport fine do the deal but not those other 3.
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:46 am to LSUPilot07
If they want 3 firsts and mccoy, you def do the deal.
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:47 am to Chalkywhite84
quote:
If they want 3 firsts and mccoy, you def do the deal.
That would be about the most I would consider. Davenport, Onyemata, etc. and I walk.
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:47 am to Chalkywhite84
I'd do that. If they add Davenport to that though, I don't know
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:51 am to LSUPilot07
quote:
You do not give up Ramcyzk, Onyemata or McCoy under any circumstance.
Naw
You press accept with the quickness if McCoy or Onymata is the ask. McCoy is a FA after next year, he’s an easy dump if they want him. Onymata’s will need a deal eventually as well and you can replace his production through the draft.
Y’all gotta understand something of consequence needs to go out for Watson. Gotta pay to play
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:52 am to Tigerbait1977
Houston leaking this BS to drive up the cost?
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:54 am to Chalkywhite84
quote:
A top 5 rt is an valuable as a top 5-7 qb.
The top 1 T makes a top 30 QB look like a top 15. He's a huge reason why we had success with Bridge, Winston, Hill, Semen.
So yeah, he's ALMOST as valuable. If this were a straight up Ram for Watson deal, then I would say pull the trigger. The deal as written, however, is a hard pass if Ram is involved.
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:56 am to Midget Death Squad
looks like Pitt is going with Trubisky, there's one less suitor for Watson/JW
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:57 am to Midget Death Squad
No he isn't.
Posted on 3/14/22 at 11:59 am to BilJ
Mercy. over the last 24 hours, seems like things are falling our way.
Hope it works out and he's a Saint (at a manageable cost)
Hope it works out and he's a Saint (at a manageable cost)
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News