Started By
Message

re: Harsh article link - Would Davenport have been there at 27?

Posted on 4/27/18 at 1:08 pm to
Posted by bluebengal
Lafayette La
Member since Feb 2018
773 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 1:08 pm to
Who cares what these so called experts think. At the end of the day our coaching staff had this targeted and made the move to get him!
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31640 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 1:13 pm to
Because he’s an overreactionary retard like 75% of our fan base
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14670 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

If he doesn’t perform, it was a mistake. That isn’t hard to understand.

Evidently it is.

The draft is about upside. This guy has massive upside so he was worth the price. He may or may not work out but either way it wasn't a mistake.
Posted by LesnarF5
Member since Apr 2015
9219 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 1:17 pm to
That guy Schwartz is a complete arse clown to say that Davenport would be there at 27. I think the team drafting right at 15 would have taken him instead of Edmunds the OLB.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166508 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

He may or may not work out but either way it wasn't a mistake.



no it absolutely is a mistake when the talent doesn't pan out. See Sullivan. See Anthony.
Posted by PaperTiger
Ruston, LA
Member since Feb 2015
22980 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 1:27 pm to
Sullivan was the worst. I still am not over that catastrophe of a draft
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
23672 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 1:32 pm to
He was going at 14, whether it was the Packers or another team that wanted him, knowing the Packers were going to draft him if they stayed put...

Dude is going to be a monster, and with the young DL talent we have, we should be set, provided we re-sign Davison... if not, i expect us to slide Hendrickson to DT with Jordan and Davenport serving as our DE's...
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
22788 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 1:40 pm to
That article was all over the place.

Firstly, there is never a guarantee that the player would have been there at 27 or even 20, for that fact. If so, dude should be in a front office.

B, dude is already calling for LJ to start over Flacco if he struggles.

Three, Falcons to the super bowl because of Ridely? Does he know they have a struggling O-line and Defense?

Bad article and you should be ashamed to have linked it.
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 1:57 pm to
Decisions are made at the margin. You can only make decisions based off of the information that you currently have. You can't rationally retroactively judge a past decision as being bad at the time it was made based off of new information that was not available when the decision was made. There is an intrinsically large amount of unknown when it comes to the draft. Even the best decisions are gambles.

Now you can say that some decisions were destined to fail because they used a bad process, but that's completely different than saying that a decision is bad because the talent didn't work out.
Posted by SaintLSU
Gretna
Member since Apr 2007
3405 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 2:15 pm to
The Saints made a stupid trade plain and simple.They don't have a clue. They could have
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 2:41 pm to
Thats a very sound and reasoned argument that im sure is based off of dozens of hours of scouting and research.
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14670 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

no it absolutely is a mistake when the talent doesn't pan out. See Sullivan. See Anthony.

So the Saints knew they wouldn't work out and took them anyway?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116326 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

The Saints made a stupid trade plain and simple.They don't have a clue. They could have


They could have what?

Please enlighten us.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166508 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 3:53 pm to
quote:


So the Saints knew they wouldn't work out and took them anyway?




when a player of such value doesn't pan out, the whole pick and thought process was a mistake.
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14670 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

when a player of such value doesn't pan out, the whole pick and thought process was a mistake.

This is something that a lot of people on this forum get wrong. You can't use hindsight to judge whether a decision was good or not.

Sully for example was a huge need and he was a damn good player at Georgia. So it was a good decision that didn't work out.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166508 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

So it was a good decision


dude, get the frick out of here.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
11977 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Green Bay was going to take him with that pick

No they were not. If they wanted him, they would not have made the trade. That is obvious.
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14670 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 4:04 pm to
Nah
Posted by Mad Dogg
LA
Member since Sep 2016
3779 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 4:12 pm to
The pick is only a mistake if we’re looking for Davenport’s replacement in the next two years
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14670 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

The pick is only a mistake if the Saints knew they'd be looking for Davenport’s replacement in the next two years when they picked him.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram