- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Yearly NBA trade thread, BREAKING: Mark Williams trade rescinded by Lakers
Posted on 2/4/25 at 1:47 pm to saints5021
Posted on 2/4/25 at 1:47 pm to saints5021
Noooo, no he does not
0
Posted on 2/4/25 at 1:53 pm to Soggymoss
Would expect Sixers to move Gordon and Drummond next. This might allow them to keep Yabusele and use the MLE for him. Outside shot that Paul George gets moved.
Posted on 2/4/25 at 1:55 pm to TechTiger
quote:
If we are getting a pick and expiring contracts back, then it’s worth it.
I'd love to see Ingram to Toronto for Boucher, Brown and a first-round pick.
Posted on 2/4/25 at 1:56 pm to Free888
quote:
Would expect Sixers to move Gordon and Drummond next. This might allow them to keep Yabusele and use the MLE for him. Outside shot that Paul George gets moved.
George looks cooked, might be one of the most untradeable contracts in the league now.
Posted on 2/4/25 at 1:58 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Right but Barrett has multiple years left. His deal is not good at all.
We don’t need to take RJ back.
If Toronto is actually interested, then they want to win games.
They can take Ingram and Theis or JRE, and send the Pels Bruce Brown and Chris Boucher along with a First maybe more.
This keeps both teams out of the tax and keeps Toronto in roster compliance since they would have an extra roster spot open.
Now we could also do this deal by taking Olinyk back instead of Boucher. His money would still be on the books next year, but it would give us another option at the 5 who can space the court.
Posted on 2/4/25 at 1:59 pm to Fun Bunch
I’m on the opposite end, give me Barrett. He gives you Ingram’s production for 25 million a year.
Posted on 2/4/25 at 1:59 pm to TechTiger
quote:
They can take Ingram and Theis or JRE, and send the Pels Bruce Brown and Chris Boucher along with a First maybe more.
Great minds think alike.
Posted on 2/4/25 at 2:04 pm to SEC Doctor
Brown and Boucher or Olynyk (1 year left) plus a pick is fine with me. Getting a positive asset for BI at this point would be more than I expect
Posted on 2/4/25 at 2:12 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:His deal is not like some sort of albatross. He has 2 years/$57 million remaining on the deal. That is not something we could not handle IMO if they think he is a positive player. I don't think the Raptors move him though.
Right but Barrett has multiple years left. His deal is not good at all.
Posted on 2/4/25 at 2:14 pm to SEC Doctor
quote:So, a 1st rounder is all you are getting then? Both are expiring contracts, so are not future assets. The 1st would likely be the Pacers, which likely will be a later 1st rounder. Would seem that a player like Barrett is more valuable than that.
I'd love to see Ingram to Toronto for Boucher, Brown and a first-round pick.
Posted on 2/4/25 at 2:19 pm to NOSHAU
quote:
His deal is not like some sort of albatross. He has 2 years/$57 million remaining on the deal. That is not something we could not handle IMO if they think he is a positive player. I don't think the Raptors move him though.
I forgot who said it, but one of the beat writers said RJ was involved in the talks and likely to be sent out in the trade if it were to happen.
They also said Toronto should wait until the offseason and work a sign and trade instead
Posted on 2/4/25 at 2:29 pm to Soggymoss
Posted on 2/4/25 at 2:33 pm to Fun Bunch
Hmmm, interesting.
We have Cain already here who didn’t play last night. Could signify something incoming
We have Cain already here who didn’t play last night. Could signify something incoming
Posted on 2/4/25 at 2:35 pm to Soggymoss
I mean Herb has always been out. No need to bring someone in because of him.
Of course they could just be doing it to do it
Of course they could just be doing it to do it
Posted on 2/4/25 at 2:38 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
mean Herb has always been out. No need to bring someone in because of him. Of course they could just be doing it to do it
Yeah, I’m trying to think of someone at the guard spot that could be involved in a trade.
We did get someone saying earlier in the week that we had a deal worked out with Detroit to duck the tax, Hawk going out maybe? That would create a need to bring in another guard until we can get the new one incorporated.
Something else to consider is Green going out, hopefully with Ingram.
Something like this would be beneficial for everyone I would think:
Pels: Podz, Collins, JHS
Warriors: Ingram, Theis, Green
Utah: Wiggins, GP3
Detroit: Schroeder, whatever pick(s) GS needs to send
This gets Pels and Warriors out of the tax, gets GS far enough under where they can sign someone on the buyout market and still stay under.
This post was edited on 2/4/25 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 2/4/25 at 2:39 pm to NOSHAU
If turning BI into cheaper deals (taking us under the tax) and a first is what we get, it is better than letting him walk for nothing.
We have to make moves to limp just under the tax and BI is not in our future plans. We could have gotten more for him at one point but Griff screwed the pooch on it since we are now down to the final days and there isn’t much of a market.
We have to make moves to limp just under the tax and BI is not in our future plans. We could have gotten more for him at one point but Griff screwed the pooch on it since we are now down to the final days and there isn’t much of a market.
Posted on 2/4/25 at 3:11 pm to teke184
I don’t want RJ. Another stat padding loser player
Posted on 2/4/25 at 3:49 pm to ghost2most
I was saying that I was willing to take the two expiring and a first if it got us under the tax and we didn’t have better offers.
I don’t want to be in the BI business this offseason because Griff couldn’t fricking move him last offseason when he should have.
I don’t want to be in the BI business this offseason because Griff couldn’t fricking move him last offseason when he should have.
Posted on 2/4/25 at 4:46 pm to Soggymoss
I think the closer we get to the deadline it increases the likelihood of either a small deal, or Pels being a part of a Butler Megatrade
Posted on 2/4/25 at 4:53 pm to Pistol44
quote:
or Pels being a part of a Butler Megatrade
What are we, 7 years running where everyone is expecting us to be the 4th team in some megatrade?
Page 31 of 46
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News