Started By
Message

re: The Pelicans Open to Trading Vast Majority of Roster

Posted on 12/19/24 at 3:33 pm to
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62443 posts
Posted on 12/19/24 at 3:33 pm to
Griff has been a year late on every major trade. And that's not a hind sight thing. If he didn't have extraordinary luck to balance out his wishful thinking he'd have gotten fired years ago.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
12068 posts
Posted on 12/19/24 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

The Pels are never going to land a Giannis or a KD, dudes like CJ and Dejounte are our best options for trades, and Griff did get those 2 dudes, and you completely ignored it because it wouldn't help your argument. It's disingenuous, at best.


Agree we are not getting those type players to come here. But I’ll circle back to two guys Griff absolutely could have had and had the chance to get, that I pushed for at the time.

Lauri M could have been had for Ball and nothing more. And I said to burn the war chest for Spyder when the Jazz put him on the market. He wasn’t traded for a superstar package and we could easily beat whatever the Cavs ordered.

Our franchise would be in better shape just with those two. Probably a lot easier to trade Zion if yiu have Lauri to take his spot.

This post was edited on 12/19/24 at 3:42 pm
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
12043 posts
Posted on 12/19/24 at 4:15 pm to
Lauri hasn't and isn't leading the Jazz to anything. Lauri is a nice player but he isn't going to change anything without a motivated Williamson.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13113 posts
Posted on 12/19/24 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

Agree we are not getting those type players to come here. But I’ll circle back to two guys Griff absolutely could have had and had the chance to get, that I pushed for at the time.

Lauri M could have been had for Ball and nothing more. And I said to burn the war chest for Spyder when the Jazz put him on the market. He wasn’t traded for a superstar package and we could easily beat whatever the Cavs ordered.

Our franchise would be in better shape just with those two. Probably a lot easier to trade Zion if yiu have Lauri to take his spot.

Now, tell me that Spyda wanted to come to NOLA in that scenario? Almost everyone wanted the Lauri for Ball deal, but Griff simply got greedy and blew it.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
12068 posts
Posted on 12/19/24 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

Now, tell me that Spyda wanted to come to NOLA in that scenario? Almost everyone wanted the Lauri for Ball deal, but Griff simply got greedy and blew it.


It’s a trade, he had years left on his contract. He didn’t have a choice. You think anyone wants to go to Cleveland lol?

And nobody on here wanted Lauri. That’s revisionist history there. I bumped the thread the other day, it had two upvotes and numerous people saying they preferred us get Satorasky in the trade instead of Lauri.
This post was edited on 12/19/24 at 5:37 pm
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
12068 posts
Posted on 12/19/24 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

Lauri hasn't and isn't leading the Jazz to anything. Lauri is a nice player but he isn't going to change anything without a motivated Williamson.


Lauri as a number two or three with Spyder isn’t going anywhere? With the roles players we have now? I disagree
This post was edited on 12/19/24 at 5:38 pm
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
12068 posts
Posted on 12/19/24 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

Lauri hasn't and isn't leading the Jazz to anything. Lauri is a nice player but he isn't going to change anything without a motivated Williamson.


I wanted Lauri at the time to provide shooting that we needed, and I never trusted Zions health. He could have started when Zion was hurt and moved to the 5 in closing lineups to play with Zion. Woukd have gave him more space.
Posted by arronrx
Pass Christian
Member since Jun 2008
105 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 2:22 am to
Just sucks that we are going to give up on talent because of incompetent leadership. On top of that we are letting the incompetent leadership continue to make incompetent decisions about talent disposition/ acquisition.

Wish they would hold off on any major moves until the end of the year. Fire everyone in the front office and then let the new leadership decide what they want to do with the talent!
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112441 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

The lack of awareness is scary if you actually think otherwise.

What are you talking about? You came into this thread to talk about me being obsessed with CJ when it didn't remotely fit with anything being discussed.


You have a fundamental lack of an ability to follow a conversation, it's wild.
quote:

So I've "pretended" to get in ridiculous arguments with you because CJ's name is mentioned with negative comments??
Yes, you have lied over and over and over and over about things you've said I've said or done with regards to CJ. That's a fact, you can argue against facts, but that would be a pretty dumb thing to do, but I'm sure you will do it. Or maybe not, because every single time you've lied and I've called you out on it, you did not respond to that, so that tells me you knew you were lying and couldn't prove otherwise, so you let it go. If you knew I was lying and could easily prove it, you'd happily post proving I'mw wrong, but you can't because I'm not wrong.
quote:

Well we wouldn't have to hear about how much you want to suck his dick that's for sure.
These are things you say when you can't refute what I said.

You look foolish right now, fix that.
This post was edited on 12/20/24 at 3:29 pm
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
17613 posts
Posted on 12/20/24 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

Lauri as a number two or three with Spyder isn’t going anywhere? With the roles players we have now? I disagree


We have entirely different roles players if we traded for those guys. You can't just add them to our current roster and call it apples.
This post was edited on 12/20/24 at 4:17 pm
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13113 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 8:26 am to
quote:

And nobody on here wanted Lauri. That’s revisionist history there. I bumped the thread the other day, it had two upvotes and numerous people saying they preferred us get Satorasky in the trade instead of Lauri.
You must have cherry picked that thread as I recall many being pissed that Griff got greedy asking for a pick as well.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13113 posts
Posted on 12/23/24 at 8:28 am to
quote:

It’s a trade, he had years left on his contract. He didn’t have a choice. You think anyone wants to go to Cleveland lol?
So, you would trade for a malcontent who did not want to be here? I agree he had no choice, but did you want Gordon 2.0?
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
10843 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 5:57 am to
It seems like the biggest rumors have us attached to the Nuggets to move Ingram. It's usually a package built around MPJ. He's pretty injury prone too, but a solid player that shoots great. Him starting alongside Murphy at forward would be interesting. Two 6'10 shooters that can get to the rim as well.

It could be more of a soft reset than a full rebuild, especially if we can't get a bunch of picks for our vets. It reminds me of when the Hornets broke up the Mourning/Johnson core and everyone thought they would be awful. But they ended up building around Mason and Rice for a couple of seasons and were actually as good, if not better. We could do something similar..
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
16582 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 6:22 am to
Route MPJ to a third team like Brooklyn, Houston or Utah for picks and call it in.

Houston would probably be very interested in MPJ.

Two I would particularly like:
Jazz: MPJ, Concar
Nuggets: Ingram
Pels: Collins, Kessler, 1-2 of those Minnesota/Cleveland picks

Rockets: Ingram
Nuggets: MPJ, Reeves or Javonte
Pels: Adams, JSJ, Tate or Landale, Concar

In the second one we buyout everyone except JSJ
Posted by touchdownjeebus
Member since Sep 2010
25333 posts
Posted on 12/26/24 at 7:09 am to
Zion cleared for practice. Let’s get his arse on the court and hope he looks like one of the monstars so we can move his arse.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
10843 posts
Posted on 12/27/24 at 7:58 am to
So I was thinking about potential trades, if we are going to gut the roster. I'd want to add great youth, picks and give us the most flexibility moving forward (tradable contracts). Just looking at rumors and potential trades, I likes these..

1. We move Murray, Green and Jones to the Spurs for K. Johson, T. Jones and S. Castle.

It's a steep price, but Castle is a potential star and the odds on favorite to win ROTY. Pairing him with Missi is a great foundation. We save about 7M.

The trade gives the Spurs two impact starters and the ability to lock up a playin spot. Plus they get off an overpay for Johnson, who needs a new setting/situation. Jones is an expiring.

2. We move Ingram for MPJ.

It's good value and the Nuggets are desperate. If MPJ doesn't work out, we got two years to flip him. He's a great talent though, with good size. He'd be an interesting pairing with Murphy.

3. We move Zion, Theis and JRE to the Hornets for G. Williams, J. Green, Salaun, plus a future 1st and 1st swap.

Deal saves us 8M, so we are way under the Tax. Williams and Green are nice bench players. Salaun has good upside, but really young and raw.

This is just a salvage move for the most assets possible. Hornets are desperate for a 2nd piece next to Ball. Plus Zion is a local guy. Best place for him to attempt to reclaim his career.

4. We move McCollum and Reeves for C. LeVert, M. Strus, and J. Tyson.

Cavs get the vet bench scorer they have been seeking. We put McCollum in a great spot to get a ring. LeVert is a big expiring. Strus is a decent specialist and a good deal to move later. I like Tyson's upside (he looked great against us).

After it's all completed, we have basically a new team. I think the depth chart would look something like..

Castle/ T. Jones/Alvarado of Boston
Hawkins/ Jsh. Green/ LeVert
Murphy/G. Williams/ Strus
MPJ/ K. Johnson/ J. Tyson/ Salaun
Missi

We need a better backup Center, but it's a super deep team with a lot of fluidity. We have a bunch of deals and assets we can move.

TLDR: I got bored and wanted to rebuild the team. Flame away..
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
16582 posts
Posted on 12/27/24 at 8:24 am to
All three of those would be horrible trades for us. We give up WAY to much for that shite return

In the Spurs deal we are giving up the equivalent value of 5-6 first round picks for two contracts, ins of which is a negative, and a rookie. Unless Wemby is involved in that you’re giving way to much.

Ingram has more value than MPJ. Also MPJ’s injury history and his back issues should immediately decline any trade unless you’re sending him to a third team.

Zion would fetch way more than a first round pick, those players are only salary.

Cavs wouldn’t want CJ, to redundant with their roster
This post was edited on 12/27/24 at 8:31 am
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
28712 posts
Posted on 12/27/24 at 8:29 am to
Nah. I'm not down with going scorched earth rebuild. We have too much talent to do that.

And Castle is not the odds on favorite





quote:

2. We move Ingram for MPJ.



I had been saying this for about a year now, but the more I watch MPJ, the more I don't want him. His basketball IQ is low.


Posted by PELsu
Member since Oct 2021
1477 posts
Posted on 12/27/24 at 9:11 am to
I know this will be tough for everyone, but there are worse things than letting Brandon leave for nothing. And one of those would be taking on a negative deal. MPJ is paid like one of the two best players on your team. And unless you have one of the greatest players to ever play the game, like Jokic, that team is doing nothing.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
10843 posts
Posted on 12/27/24 at 9:34 am to
quote:

All three of those would be horrible trades for us. We give up WAY to much for that shite return


I love the end result. If we go into a future with that core, I think there is a ton of promise.

quote:

In the Spurs deal we are giving up the equivalent value of 5-6 first round picks for two contracts, ins of which is a negative, and a rookie. Unless Wemby is involved in that you’re giving way to much.


Not all 1sts are the same. So maybe we could get 1sts in 2030 and 2031. But none of those have great value. I believe this, as it stands now, Castle is worth more than Murray or Jones. He's younger, cheaper, and has dramatically more potential. It would be super rare for a team to trade someone like him. So it would need to be big deal to get them to make a move. We might actually have yo include more.

quote:

Ingram has more value than MPJ.


I believe they are both somewhat negative at this point. MPJ is actually more proven and is more transferable to other systems. I think it depends on the team.

quote:

Zion would fetch way more than a first round pick, those players are only salary.



I am fascinated by this point of view. Why do you believe this?

I read pretty much everything written about Zion. From what I have seen, he is basically radioactive to 50-75% of the league. They aren't touching him. Especially on a big deal. We have 5-6 teams we could swing a deal and they aren't giving up major assets for him. If we get a young player (like Salaun) and a pick or two, plus salary filler, we'd make out pretty good.

quote:

Cavs wouldn’t want CJ, to redundant with their roster


He is not at all. They want a veteran shooter off the bench. He takes minutes from those two vets. They have a monter front court that can cover for him. They are also one of the major teams connected to him, plus he's from Ohio. It just makes sense on a lot of levels..
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram