- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Official NBA Free Agency/Offseason Thread Update: MITCHELL TO CLE
Posted on 6/28/22 at 5:12 pm to duyp
Posted on 6/28/22 at 5:12 pm to duyp
quote:a plane ticket and a trade that the clippers would accept
What will it take for Luke Kennard to come here?
here's their roster
Reggie Jackson
Paul George
Kawhi Leonard
Marcus Morris
Ivica Zubac
John Wall
Luke Kennard
Norman Powell
Terance Mann
Amir Coffey
Robert Covington
Nicolas Batum
Isaiah Hartenstein
they already have more players than they can play. they arent going to want graham/temple/etc. they would want a draft pick. so you'd be looking at a 3-team trade at least (pels have picks, need roster spots. clips have players, need picks)
0
Posted on 6/28/22 at 5:27 pm to PELsu
What if we gave the Knicks Graham, Hayes and a 2nd and did a sign and trade for Mitchell Robinson?
That’s technically a better package than we got from the Bulls for Lonzo last year lol.
I’m not sure it’s 100% realistic, but if we call all 30 teams with some kind of 2-1 or 3-1 for a player opposing teams are willing to get rid of or would rather not pay. I think eventually we would get a few takers and then we could determine what is the best fit for our team/rotation/etc.
Perhaps the proposed package above would work better with Temple than Graham since he is an expiring and the Knicks are all about creating cap space.
That’s technically a better package than we got from the Bulls for Lonzo last year lol.
I’m not sure it’s 100% realistic, but if we call all 30 teams with some kind of 2-1 or 3-1 for a player opposing teams are willing to get rid of or would rather not pay. I think eventually we would get a few takers and then we could determine what is the best fit for our team/rotation/etc.
Perhaps the proposed package above would work better with Temple than Graham since he is an expiring and the Knicks are all about creating cap space.
This post was edited on 6/28/22 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 6/28/22 at 5:47 pm to 3PieceSpicy
knicks still have to trade noel or burks to get enough space to sign brunson. they arent talking graham
Posted on 6/28/22 at 5:51 pm to 3PieceSpicy
The only player I want from the Knicks is Immanuel Quickley. I’d over pay to take him and Burks for Graham/Kira/Temple/ Hayes package(s)
Posted on 6/28/22 at 5:53 pm to brmark70816
Never said he’s not, but Clippers had a team option for 7 million, they declined the team option and then payed him more.
They could have exercised his option, then gave him the extension next year and saved money
They could have exercised his option, then gave him the extension next year and saved money
This post was edited on 6/28/22 at 5:55 pm
Posted on 6/28/22 at 5:54 pm to Soggymoss
quote:To lock him up for a longer term. Given that salaries are likely to rise, I think it is a smart move.
Never said he’s not, but Clippers had a team option for 7 million, they declined the team option and then payed him more.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 6:02 pm to Dantheman504
quote:
I’d over pay to take him and Burks for Graham/Kira/Temple/ Hayes package(s)
one more time...the knicks are cutting salary to clear cap space. they are not trading anyone for anything that doesnt have a salary of "zero" attached to it
Posted on 6/28/22 at 6:11 pm to cgrand
Yeah Knicks are tough bc they don’t want salary and Graham and Brunson would be a hilariously small backcourt.
Broader point is, I think we can eventually find a 2 or 3 for 1 that makes sense for both teams and also our rotation.
It will probably be for someone nobody on here has even mentioned, because that’s what we normally do lol.
Redick, Favors, Bledsoe, Adams, Graham, Jonas, CJ
All somewhat out of left field and unexpected trades/signings this current regime has made. Although, the CJ pickup was gathering momentum due to the Dame injury and Blazers tanking. But 4 months prior, I’m not sure any of us thought a CJ trade was realistic.
Broader point is, I think we can eventually find a 2 or 3 for 1 that makes sense for both teams and also our rotation.
It will probably be for someone nobody on here has even mentioned, because that’s what we normally do lol.
Redick, Favors, Bledsoe, Adams, Graham, Jonas, CJ
All somewhat out of left field and unexpected trades/signings this current regime has made. Although, the CJ pickup was gathering momentum due to the Dame injury and Blazers tanking. But 4 months prior, I’m not sure any of us thought a CJ trade was realistic.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 6:15 pm to cgrand
Temple can be bought out or stretched at 1 mil for 5 years. It’s exactly a player they could take and get to that “zero” #. You could attach Kira with picks + Temple and they would have 7 mil extra. The hardest part would be finding a trade partner for Graham or still creating an extra roster spot. Just saying it is very much possible but not likely at all.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 6:19 pm to Epic Cajun
I love it simply because this is part of a Clippers long term win at the expense of the Lakers.
The Lakers flipped Zubac and Michael Beasley for Mike Muscala back in 2019 at the deadline. Muscala walked that offseason. Zubac potentially could have been part of an AD trade or re-signed afterward when the Lakers needed depth, yet they dumped him.
The Lakers flipped Zubac and Michael Beasley for Mike Muscala back in 2019 at the deadline. Muscala walked that offseason. Zubac potentially could have been part of an AD trade or re-signed afterward when the Lakers needed depth, yet they dumped him.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 6:26 pm to Dantheman504
quote:
Temple can be bought out or stretched at 1 mil for 5 years.
That's what I want us to do, if we can't get Liddell to sign a two-way contract with the promise of converting it later in the season. I like our roster the way that it is.
The only other thing that I want us to be doing is offering Malik Monk the full MLE to come here.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 6:32 pm to GOP_Tiger
I would also really like to get Malik Monk but he may get paid more than the full MLE.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 6:46 pm to cgrand
quote:
he’s pretty good at getting paid but that’s about it
Outside of sports, this is a great attribute to have.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:10 pm to cgrand
We could send them temple while Jax goes to a third team. Don't know what picks to include where.
That's a Knicks savings of 5 mil with Burks coming back to nola.
That's a Knicks savings of 5 mil with Burks coming back to nola.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:17 pm to LosLobos111
According to Scoop B Trey, Naji, and Jose are all playing Summer League
Daniels
Alvarado
Murphy
Liddell
Marshall
Brockington
Seabron
Matkovic
That’s the team thus far I think
Daniels
Alvarado
Murphy
Liddell
Marshall
Brockington
Seabron
Matkovic
That’s the team thus far I think
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:19 pm to BallHawk
Wrong thread oops
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:39 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
That's what I want us to do, if we can't get Liddell to sign a two-way contract with the promise of converting it later in the season. I like our roster the way that it is.
Why stretch him when we could just cut him without stretching and have virtually no negative effect?
Posted on 6/28/22 at 7:42 pm to Epic Cajun
Yea, I'd rather eat the $5 mil all at once then spreading it out.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 8:00 pm to shel311
quote:
Yea, I'd rather eat the $5 mil all at once then spreading it out.
Me too, if we can do it and stay under the tax line. I think that would put us right on the edge, no?
Posted on 6/28/22 at 8:12 pm to GOP_Tiger
We are about $7m below so, yes, that gets us close.
Page 18 of 111
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News