
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Queen has been
Posted on 11/1/26 at 3:21 am
Posted on 11/1/26 at 3:21 am
average at best. He was not worth a first round pick so far. Maybe he will get better as time goes along.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 6:50 am to PrairievilleTiger
This post has been marked unreadable!
Posted on 11/1/26 at 7:10 am to PrairievilleTiger
Queen will be a very good player but as we said at the time, it’ll never be worth what we gave up.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 8:04 am to PrairievilleTiger
Average at best is pretty good for where he was picked. The fact that we gave up a second unprotected 1st round pick to simply move up to get him is what makes it nearly impossible for him to live up to the value.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 8:08 am to Tigerfan14
I’d still rather him than Kingston Flemings
Posted on 11/1/26 at 10:29 am to SCLSUMuddogs
quote:
I’d still rather him than Kingston Flemings
It wasn't just Kingston Flemmings; perhaps you forgot.
One thing I feel certain of --- DQ will always be a defensive liability. He doesn't have the athleticism to defend in this league. That said, he has a long way to go offensively to prove he's worth two first round selections (one being a lottery pick). I am impressed with his rebounding thus far this year.
DEFENSE!!! DEFENSE!!! DEFEENSE!!!
Posted on 11/1/26 at 11:02 am to iykyk985
Queen starting avg (48 games):
27 min/ 13.4 pts/ 8 reb/ 4.6 ast/ 1stl/ 1blck
Queen off the bench avg ( 38 games):
24 min 11.8 its/ 7.8 reb/ 1.8 ast/ 1st/ .6 blck
We haven't necessarily maximized his abilities or potential compared to Fears. Its also obvious that he is less impactful off the bench with a dip on blocks and a bigger drop in assists.
He's a walking double/ double that has the ability to get 5-10 assists any game.
Ironically enough his worst trajectory right now is a Jonas Val who will be better at defense and will get 5x the assists.
Averaging 1 stl/ 1 blck per game while starting half/ off the bench half and playing both PF/ C is not a liability.
Y'all have wanted Val back since he left, this dude does the same + more but yet y'all hate him for reasons that have nothing to do with him specifically or comparable to other players you like.
27 min/ 13.4 pts/ 8 reb/ 4.6 ast/ 1stl/ 1blck
Queen off the bench avg ( 38 games):
24 min 11.8 its/ 7.8 reb/ 1.8 ast/ 1st/ .6 blck
We haven't necessarily maximized his abilities or potential compared to Fears. Its also obvious that he is less impactful off the bench with a dip on blocks and a bigger drop in assists.
He's a walking double/ double that has the ability to get 5-10 assists any game.
Ironically enough his worst trajectory right now is a Jonas Val who will be better at defense and will get 5x the assists.
Averaging 1 stl/ 1 blck per game while starting half/ off the bench half and playing both PF/ C is not a liability.
Y'all have wanted Val back since he left, this dude does the same + more but yet y'all hate him for reasons that have nothing to do with him specifically or comparable to other players you like.
This post was edited on 11/2/26 at 8:57 am
Posted on 11/1/26 at 11:29 am to spaghettioeauxs
I remember when Fears was a bust 4 games into the season now everyone loves him. Queen is basically the hub off the bench. And he’s been doing really good
Posted on 11/1/26 at 11:44 am to Dantheman504
He is so much better than Val it’s actually disrespectful to compare the two. One is a skilled big man who can be an offensive hub, the other would miss wide open putbacks.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 2:45 pm to PrairievilleTiger
Wtf does Demps keep posting that keeps getting axed?
Posted on 11/1/26 at 9:41 pm to Froman
quote:
Queen will be a very good player but as we said at the time, it’ll never be worth what we gave up.
It’s not impossible that he could be worth it (though he would need to become really good); but it will always be a disaster of a trade because Dumars gave up way, way more than we needed to offer to move up and draft him. How good Queen is or isn’t will ever negate that incompetence.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 9:47 pm to spaghettioeauxs
I like Queen too, but Jonas was a winning player for us. You could pencil him in for 12 points, 12 boards a night, for 82 nights a year. He was arguably our 2nd or 3rd best player in the Griff Era. Ingram, CJ Jonas. Jrue wasn't here long enough for me during the Griff Era to count.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 10:29 pm to spaghettioeauxs
quote:Recency bias much?
He is so much better than Val it’s actually disrespectful to compare the two. One is a skilled big man who can be an offensive hub, the other would miss wide open putbacks.
Posted on 11/1/26 at 10:43 pm to SenGooner
I’m one of the only people who wasn’t a huge fan of Val. Yeah, maybe he deserves more respect because he was an Ironman when everyone else on the team was oft injured. I’ll give him that, but my main memories of him are him getting his big paws on an offensive rebound and missing the tip in from beneath the goal. shite used to infuriate me.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 7:27 am to cfish140
quote:
Wtf does Demps keep posting that keeps getting axed?
Apparently this forum is run by commies where free speech isn’t allowed.
I don’t know what he’s saying, nor do I care, but just b/c you don’t like what he has to say or don’t agree with it doesn’t mean it should be banned. Whoever the admin is that’s doing this is acting like a child.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 9:14 am to spaghettioeauxs
quote:
He is so much better than Val it’s actually disrespectful to compare the two. One is a skilled big man who can be an offensive hub, the other would miss wide open putbacks.
Val might go down as the most disrespected Pelican ever. Dude was a work horse for three straight seasons and basically averaged 16/11 for the three seasons. And we suffered when he left. The Val slander is kind of insane.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 9:21 am to SenGooner
quote:
You could pencil him in for 12 points, 12 boards a night, for 82 nights a year. He was arguably our 2nd or 3rd best player in the Griff Era.
Queen is already averaging 13.5 pts/ 8 reb with absolutely no rhythm or consistent minutes/ lineups. Add in that he averages .5 more steals/ blocks + 2-3 extra assists and its better.
Val rookie year:
9 pts/ 6 reb/ .7 ast/ .3 stl/ 1.3 blk
Queen rookie year:
11.7 pts/ 7 reb/ 3.7 ast/ 1 stl/ 1blk
He's Val's rebounding/ shooting + more assists and better defense. These are also stats with inconsistent minutes and a dysfunctional team, they could be better.
Queen looks slow but can get to his spot, Val is a sloth.
Anyone who has said they want Val the last few years should not have any ill will towards Queen.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 9:22 am to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
The Val slander is kind of insane.
Imagine comparing a high regarded young player that we traded 2 drats picks for to a loved player who played really well for us and thinking its slander.
Its only slander if you view Queen that low, says more about you.
Jonas has had 1 career 30/20 game:
34 pts/ 20 reb/ 5 ast
Queen (1) 30/20 game:
30 pts/ 22 reb/ 4 ast
Jonas has had 1 Trip Dub:
26 pts/ 19 reb/ 12 ast
Queen has (2) Trip Dubs:
33 pts/10 reb/10 ast
(1st 30 pt trip dub from a rookie C in history)
14 pts/ 16 reb/ 12 ast
Val has a higher chance to get 25/30 pts and Queen has a higher chance to do more everywhere else. This is a pretty crazy comparison considering these games haplened in Queen's rookie year vs 14 year career of Val.
This post was edited on 11/2/26 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 11/2/26 at 9:26 am to Dantheman504
quote:
Imagine comparing a high regarded young player that we traded 2 drats picks for to a loved player who pkayed really well for us and thinking its slander.
Its only slander if you view Queen that low dufus. Says more about you.
Wtf are you on about? It was in regards to this...
quote:
One is a skilled big man who can be an offensive hub, the other would miss wide open putbacks.
That is indeed Val slander. Like it's an insult to Queen to even be compared to a guy as shitty as Val, a guy who apparently despite average 16/11 he can't make layups.

Popular
Back to top

4









