Started By
Message

re: Queen has been

Posted on 11/2/26 at 9:36 am to
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
7255 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 9:36 am to
quote:

shitty as Val, a guy who apparently despite average 16/11 he can't make layups.

Ironically Val was exactly what y'all claim Queen to be (a true defensive liability). Someone said he's a winning player but he's never won anything.

Val is indeed a walking double double who can space the floor. That's really it.

It isn't slander if your honest about Queens overall game vs Val's. Queen is an offensive hub, Val struggled in the paint on defense and offense.
This post was edited on 11/2/26 at 9:37 am
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
44449 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Ironically Val was exactly what y'all claim Queen to be (a true defensive liability)


There's the "y'all" again you like to use with me. Find one post in the past two years where I've hated on Queen's defense, or really Queen in general outside of the trade itself. I'll wait.

quote:

Val is indeed a walking double double who can space the floor. That's really it.

It isn't slander if your honest about Queens overall game vs Val's. Queen is an offensive hub, Val struggled in the paint on defense and offense.


Of all the things on this entire board that I could not give a shite less about, it's whatever your opinion is on anything Pels. Your projections for players and the team overall is constantly wrong so I just view your posts as white noise. If you can't see that saying all Val was able to do here was miss layups I can't help you. That has nothing to do with Queens ability, it's just a ridiculous knock on Val.

Just so you know, whatever your reply to this is, I don't care. Take that for what it's worth when deciding to reply to this or not.
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
28914 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Apparently this forum is run by commies where free speech isn’t allowed.


Teddy, youre a long time contributor to the board and I dont mind giving you my reasoning. Your choice to disagree, I'm not trying to convince you, only explain why.

Demps is a boot krewe guy, has posted misinformation, and brings nothing but dissent and negativity to this board. I can tolerate some of it but not all of it. He also lied about being a boot krewe member, and generally just uses this site to drive traffic to his show.

I'm not the only one tired of his shtick, hes the one that asked me "what are you going to do about it" and this is my response. I dont think the board needs weak trolls hellbent on feeding their own agendas for their shitty podcasts.
Posted by spaghettioeauxs
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2017
3371 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 10:43 am to
The most telling thing about Val was when he left the Pels, where did he sign? Surely as a walking double double he went to a contender to put them over the top. Oh, nvm. He signed with the Washington Wizards. He was really good with the Pels his first season and then he regressed pretty heavily to the point of deserving about 12 minutes off the bench any given night.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30956 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:16 am to
quote:

Demps is a boot krewe guy, has posted misinformation, and brings nothing but dissent and negativity to this board


not a reason to silence someone. There's been plenty of people like this come and go. And yes they are irritating, but i just don't agree with silencing anyone simply b/c they suck. Ignore them and move on.
People post misinformation all the time. Sometimes intentional, sometimes simply b/c they are too stupid to recognize it's wrong. Someone typically will always come around and prove them wrong with actual facts.

quote:

generally just uses this site to drive traffic to his show.


This is a reason to ban posts, posts that advertise his show.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
7255 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:33 am to
quote:

He was really good with the Pels his first season and then he regressed pretty heavily to the point of deserving about 12 minutes off the bench any given night.

He was really solid throughout his career but also limited outside of rebounding and scoring. I agree with iwyLSUiwy that he doesn't deserve the disrespect for what he did/ is. Val was a beast double/ double player but he's not Jokic. There's a reason Queen is called baby Jokic and not baby Valanciunis.

Comparing Queen to Val wasn't an insult to Val and more of a flex to Queen and his ceiling.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram