- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New Orleans Pelicans are willing to part ways with Brandon Ingram in hopes of getting Dame
Posted on 6/28/21 at 10:26 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/28/21 at 10:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Long term? Absolutely, but I think short term Zion + Lillard + improvement from NAW and Hayes + a coach that doesn't suck could have this team as a top 4 seed in the West. And if you put yourself in that situation, anything can happen, look at the Suns/Hawks this season.
SGA + BI + Zion > Lillard + Zion without question
SGA + BI + Zion could really be something awesome in the future though.
I would be ecstatic with either of those scenarios, even if it means cashing in our war chest of picks.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 10:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Are there examples of teams with 2 top 10 players(let's assume health) that go 3 years without winning a playoff series?
we would have major roster issues
quote:I feel like you're posting makes it seem like Dame is 34 or 35. He's 31.
and that's projecting Lillard at THIS level, which has an unclear time length remaining
Posted on 6/28/21 at 10:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Lillard
Ball
Roco
Zion
Hayes
with no real bench except NAW.
NAW
Adams
Hart
Naji
I mean it's not the best bench in the world, but it's not "no real bench" either. Not to mention we would still have the MLE to pick up another solid role player.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 10:29 am to shel311
Zion and Dame alone would have the Pels as a top 4 seed. I just don’t see how that can be argued.
And if shooters don’t want to come sign and play with that pair…something is off
And if shooters don’t want to come sign and play with that pair…something is off
Posted on 6/28/21 at 10:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
we would have major roster issues unless we spent more and got Covington back
Gayle will spend if we're contending.
quote:
but we'd need both LA franchises to melt down to be confident in saying Western Conference contenders
Uh kawhi is pissed at the clips and the Lakers just got a year older LeBron and have no cap room. I'd also take that projected lineup against them as well. I feel like you're underselling how good Zion and Dame would be right now without even factoring in how much better Zion will get.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 10:37 am to Pelefraan 1
quote:
Yeah ok
I’m not even sure they would want Ingram.
The only way I see them demanding BI is if they want to sell this as a “win” to their fans. “We brought back an all star!” The reality is that, once they lose Dame, CJ and Covington are both likely out shortly thereafter. BI doesn’t move that needle and they’re about to go into a gigantic rebuild.
All that said, the Blazers don’t have the Pels over a barrel like the Pels did the Lakers or Bucks. Pels can say the Blazers’ offer is too steep and we’ll use our insane amount of picks on the next guy.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 10:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
but without BI, we'll improve enough to fix those issues and make the playoffs, but we will be a quick out...for 2, maybe 3 years
I think they can figure out a way to keep BI and still get Dame. But, if they were to ship out BI, they’re not also sending out every pick. They’d still have Bledsoe and Adams’ deals to package with a bunch of picks to upgrade. They’d probably bring back Lonzo who would be a movable asset.
They can make a deal with Portland and still maintain a decent amount of flexibility moving forward. Plus Gayle will pay the tax for a perceived contender.
This post was edited on 6/28/21 at 11:27 am
Posted on 6/28/21 at 10:45 am to TotesMcGotes
quote:
I’m not even sure they would want Ingram.
I can see them wanting him for value reasons, but not basketball reasons. If they trade Lillard they are going to rebuild mode. Ingram would be nothing for them except a trade chip, but if we send them an equivalent value in picks I don’t see why BI would need to be involved.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 10:51 am to SLafourche07
I would agree.
Not only can the Pels offer the best offer of anyone out there who is likely buying (meaning OKC is out), they can pretty much tailor that deal however Portland would want it. Picks, young players, an all star, bloated contract vets. We have it all.
Not only can the Pels offer the best offer of anyone out there who is likely buying (meaning OKC is out), they can pretty much tailor that deal however Portland would want it. Picks, young players, an all star, bloated contract vets. We have it all.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 10:57 am to TotesMcGotes
The hardest part of building a team, especially in a small market, is top end talent acquisition. If we have the opportunity to grab Dame, we need to do it. If we can keep BI, that is excellent. If we have to send him out, we do it and pair Zion and Dame. Then, we figure out the rest to build depth and roster imbalances.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 10:58 am to TotesMcGotes
That is my position as well. If they wanna go full rebuild, they can do it around a budding NAW/JAX and a slew of picks. If they wanna attempt to remain competitive or parlay a player into more picks, they can take BI.
Them taking on contracts shouldn’t be a big deal regardless because they will need to match outgoing unless the other team can absorb it, and good luck finding a suitor that can do that. Plus, they can flip an expiring Bled and Adams into more picks and pieces once they’ve served their purpose.
Them taking on contracts shouldn’t be a big deal regardless because they will need to match outgoing unless the other team can absorb it, and good luck finding a suitor that can do that. Plus, they can flip an expiring Bled and Adams into more picks and pieces once they’ve served their purpose.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 11:06 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SGA + BI + Zion > Lillard + Zion without question
Now fill out the roster for both scenarios and do it again.
You know what you are getting with Lillard, a guy ready and capable of winning a championship right now. SGA/BI aren't anywhere near that level yet, and you don't even know if they ever will get there, and if you have to throw the kitchen sink to get SGA, you don't have as many assets to improve yourself. A veteran taking a minimum contract instead of more money isnt' choosing to play with SGA/BI/Zion right now.
One thing that would happen that no one is thinking about is the buyout market and the veteran FA market.
When Kevin Love gets bought out b/c no one will trade for him, you can then get him at the vet minimum, and it wouldn't be hard to get him here b/c he knows he would have a shot to win it and he'd actually get to play. Houston is probably going to buy John Wall out if they can't trade him.
WHen you throw MLE money at a veteran, like what Phoenix did with Jae Crowder, they will be more inclined to join Lillard/Zion than most other teams, especially if they know they will be an integral part. We can give Jeff Green more than Brooklyn can, same with Batum and the Clippers. Would be a nice veteran SF/PF to have. Maybe Denver isn't willing to give Will Barton the full MLE.
a guy like Rudy Gay would consider signing with us in a heartbeat if Lillard came here, for the vet minimum.
Lillard's value should be what Harden's was. that was Allen/LeVert and 3 likely crappy firsts. I don't see much value in pick swaps, unless they are way down the line. the 2021 and 2023 pick swaps Brooklyn gave Houston are worthless.
BI, Kira and 4 firsts or Jax/NAW and 3 firsts, including the #10 pick should be more than enough, and if we did that, we'd still have picks to go out and get more. I'd say go all in and get rid of all the picks.
BI/Kira/#10/#35/2022/2023/2027 firsts for Lillard
Lonzo/Bledsoe/Iwundu/2025/2026 for Barnes/Buddy
Lillard
NAW/Buddy/Didi
Barnes/Naji
Zion
Jax/Adams/Billy
That's 10 players at $123.7 million in salaries with a tax cap at $136.6M. So you basically have $13M to fill out the roster if you want to stay under the tax. Max MLE is $9.5M for the first year. You'd need at least 3 more vet minimums at $1.7M each, so that's $5.1M. You'd want to keep a minimum spot open under the tax, so you really only want to spend about $6M of the MLE.
Get Love after he's bought out. there's your back up PF.
Sign Patty Mills to be your backup PG.
Sign Rudy Gay at backup SF/PF.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 11:36 am to TigerinATL
quote:
If I'm Portland then Simmons, Maxey, Picks is the most attractive package. If I'm Philly getting Dame back is the best return for Simmons you'll find.
You think so?
Not necessarily disagreeing, but Simmons seems radioactive right now, and his flaw is essentially the worst flaw a modern-day NBA player could have.
Plus Dame/Embiid draft picks in a big market seem wayyy more likely to be useless than snakebitten New Orleans draft picks
Posted on 6/28/21 at 11:40 am to Brettesaurus Rex
BI for Dame; AND we add picks?
frick.that.
Zion - will be 21 to start the season
Dame - will be 31 to start the season
BI - will be 24 to start the season
So I'm giving up a 24/5/5 player who has yet to entire their prime for a tail-prime end guard. Who has MAYBE 5 years left of being elite.
Talk about wrong timeline. If I'm getting Dame, I'm not giving up BI. All this chatter was like AD for Tatum and we wanted both him and brown. reality is, BI aint available unless its a young elite talent around Zion's age.
frick.that.
Zion - will be 21 to start the season
Dame - will be 31 to start the season
BI - will be 24 to start the season
So I'm giving up a 24/5/5 player who has yet to entire their prime for a tail-prime end guard. Who has MAYBE 5 years left of being elite.
Talk about wrong timeline. If I'm getting Dame, I'm not giving up BI. All this chatter was like AD for Tatum and we wanted both him and brown. reality is, BI aint available unless its a young elite talent around Zion's age.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 11:40 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:You're on to something here...the "Take our draft picks because they'll be very valuable when we frick it up in 2 years" strategy
Plus Dame/Embiid draft picks in a big market seem wayyy more likely to be useless than snakebitten New Orleans draft picks
This post was edited on 6/28/21 at 11:41 am
Posted on 6/28/21 at 11:43 am to ThePistol
quote:
Ingram is entering his sixth year in the NBA. I didn’t see growth last season, I saw a plateau. I’m not saying he can’t improve. A jump to an alpha dog for a championship level team is a ton of improvement though.
Seemed like the coach had a plan for Zion but not him. He was forgotten about. Even so, I’ll take a plateau. Finishing games is a mental thing that will come with time.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 12:03 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
You think so?
Not necessarily disagreeing, but Simmons seems radioactive right now, and his flaw is essentially the worst flaw a modern-day NBA player could have.
CJ + Ingram <<<<<<<< CJ + Dame while trying to be the same kind of team.
Trading with the Pels pushes the Blazers down a tier into the playoff bubble where they'll never have a good shot at a favorable playoff matchup or a high draft pick.
CJ + Simmons forces Portland to become a different team, probably build a 4 out style to fit Simmons better and you can have a better defense. You also have Maxey who looks like a potentially good 2 way player. I think shifting in that direction gets them farther than a build around CJ/Ingram.
This post was edited on 6/28/21 at 12:04 pm
Posted on 6/28/21 at 12:05 pm to TigerinATL
You think that POR would go for the short rebuild? I think that they would sell CJ too and go for the full restart.
Posted on 6/28/21 at 12:13 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
You think that POR would go for the short rebuild?
Olshey threw everyone under the bus LINK That kind of finger pointing and blame deflection are the acts of a desperate man that doesn't think they'll be here for the next rebuild. Maybe Olshey gets fired with 3 years left on his deal, and Portland does go rebuild, but if he doesn't he has given no indication that he's interested in/comfortable with doing a rebuild.
This post was edited on 6/28/21 at 12:21 pm
Popular
Back to top


0






