Started By
Message

re: Murray to Pels is OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL

Posted on 7/4/24 at 11:33 pm to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112854 posts
Posted on 7/4/24 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

And that helped us how?
Not really relevant to the post I replied to and what I said
Posted by THRILLHO
Old Metairie near Cleary
Member since Apr 2006
50399 posts
Posted on 7/4/24 at 11:53 pm to
quote:

Adding Murray also lets us maximize our offense by having a PG and his defense allows for Herb to come of the bench.



Not going to happen.

Murray + Herb + BI/Trey + Zion is enough offense. It makes way more sense to bring a really good offensive player off of the bench (CJ) than it does a stud defender.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
6524 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 6:54 am to
quote:

It makes way more sense to bring a really good offensive player off of the bench (CJ) than it does a stud defender.


It makes more sesse to bring our starting SG and backup SG from the bench and start our starting SF and backup SF?

Instead of playing (1) SG + (1) SF and bringing in (1) SG + (1) SF.

Yall are obsessed with putting CJ/ Hawk together instead of realizing:

Hawk/ Herb is the paring needed off the bench.

Murray was brought in to start with CJ...

You want to roll with a CJ/ Hawk backcourt? Or put either at SF?

Super efficient way to split up the minutes of our only 2 true SG's and evaluate our (2) assets with a murky future..

Herb Jones is 6-8 210 and is currently our #2 SF.
This post was edited on 7/5/24 at 7:02 am
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
6524 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:07 am to
quote:

It makes way more sense to bring a really good offensive player off of the bench (CJ) than it does a stud defender.


And what do you think Hawk is?

We have to see if he is that player and put a strong defender with him to limit his negative impact there until he improves.

Why not bring in your "best offense"
AND
Bring a stud defender (Herb) + Really good offensive player (hopefully Hawk) off the bench.

And guess what? If Hawk isn't that guy and CJ declines then they are both gone.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
6524 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:14 am to
Murray/ Jose
CJ/ Hawk
Trey/ Herb
Zion/ Trey
Center/ center

Both your starters and bench have a 1,2,3,4,5 like a real basketball team and maximizing your best players.

If Herb is going to close games anyway then I'd much rather him coming off the bench to gaurd tired starters and backups with fresh legs while we already have the lead..
This post was edited on 7/5/24 at 7:16 am
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103966 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:28 am to
Doing that puts him as a favorite for Sixth Man if he is already All Defense first team.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
6524 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:33 am to
All of his stats should increase.

It should also help sustain leads and prevent other teams coming back into the game.

Get lead + keep lead + gain lead + put em to sleep

Instead of Herb being our #5 player on the starters he becomes our #1 2nd unit guy.
This post was edited on 7/5/24 at 8:32 am
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
37052 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:39 am to
I would bet that Herb starts over Trey
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
6524 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 7:59 am to
This would be the only other thing that makes sense.

Not sold on Jose/ Hawk/ Trey off the bench tho. In that scenario Herb would prob stay in and Trey would play the 4.

So same plan except with Herb starting instead of Trey. Neither at SG.
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
26833 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:15 am to
It really doesn’t matter who starts. Herb, Trey, and CJ all averaged about 30 minutes per game last year.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
6524 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:24 am to
quote:

It really doesn’t matter who starts. Herb, Trey, and CJ all averaged about 30 minutes per game last year.


Getting leads and keeping leads doesn't matter?

Trey should start and Herb should finish. I agree none of the inbetween matters as long as everyone is getting their minutes, Hawk/ CJ aren't on the floor together, and only PG's + Zion play PG.
This post was edited on 7/5/24 at 8:25 am
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
11544 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:33 am to
quote:

Trey should start and Herb should finish.


Will never happen under Willie. Also you want his defense to set the tone.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
6524 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Trey should start and Herb should finish.

Will never happen under Willie. Also you want his defense to set the tone.


Herb closing games will most certainly happen unless we are down big.
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
27511 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Trey should start and Herb should finish


Both should be on the court at the end of games unless Trey is just absolutely off.

End of games should always have these 5 on the floor if ingram is truly traded

Murray
CJ
Herb
Trey
Z

If ingram isn't traded then Herb will go to the bench. 4 shot creators in cj zion ingram and Murray in crunch time with Trey sniping is wild.

that lineup can cheat in the paint with doubles on bigs because they'll be quick and long enough to switch and recover. Of course this only works if Zion is truly a skinny boy to start the season and takes another step on defense. And I think he will
This post was edited on 7/5/24 at 8:48 am
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
6524 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:56 am to
quote:

End of games should always have these 5 on the floor if ingram is truly traded

Murray
CJ
Herb
Trey
Z


This isn't dependent on what center we end up with or the score of the game?

Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
11544 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Herb closing games will most certainly happen unless we are down big.


Yes Herb will always close but hes not coming off the bench. The discussion will always be whether CJ or Trey will start.
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
6524 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 9:05 am to
quote:

The discussion will always be whether CJ or Trey will start


Not necessarily. I'm pretty sure discussion was always Herb vs Trey unless CJ gets moved or is unable to start.

CJ playing PG as a weak defender and out of position on offense made Herb's jobs harder and more needed.

Getting Murray fixes that and adds defense back to the starting lineup while minimizing CJ's opportunities for mistake.

Murray + CJ should have a better +/- than CJ/ Herb.

Do yall really think we just got Murray and kept CJ to start Murray/ Herb at 1 and 2?
This post was edited on 7/5/24 at 9:06 am
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
6524 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 9:07 am to
CJ off the bench with Hawk 3rd string?

Hell yeah let's shrink CJ's trade value as low as we can AND limit minutes for his future replacemt.
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
27511 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 9:08 am to
quote:

This isn't dependent on what center we end up with or the score of the game?


We're not getting a center that can crack that lineup imo. They'll either be just as slow as Val, too small anyways, dumb, etc.

I want the Warriors death lineup. Zion with 4 willing 3pt shooters.
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
15967 posts
Posted on 7/5/24 at 9:10 am to
I think the path forward is pretty clear. CJ starts this year, Trey comes off the bench. Next offseason they look to move CJ as an expiring contract, and Trey moves into the starting five permanently.
This post was edited on 7/5/24 at 9:11 am
Jump to page
Page First 27 28 29 30 31 ... 34
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 29 of 34Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram