- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:28 pm to corndeaux
I would ask love if I ever met him whether he regrets signing that deal with CLE.
That’s sounds ridiculous but he’s already made 100MM...
basketball nirvana awaits him on any number of good teams, at decent money.
he would be the ultimate hired gun a la big shot bob
That’s sounds ridiculous but he’s already made 100MM...
basketball nirvana awaits him on any number of good teams, at decent money.
he would be the ultimate hired gun a la big shot bob
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:28 pm to cgrand
Can you imagine the best two outlet passers in the league, Love & Ball, on the same team as fricking Zion and wide receiver Hayes!?
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:30 pm to Dogstar
it would be incredible to watch
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:30 pm to Dogstar
Love is a good fit too. It’s just his contract is crazy but I guess it can equal out with Zion rookie contract.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:42 pm to corndeaux
quote:
I would argue paying that guy, even a huge sum for 4 years, is valuable and worth it. I would argue it can be more valuable than cycling through older, cheaper options. And they can do it and still have flexibility.
That's why I posed the question I did in my first post in this thread. If Niko will be overpaid to the point of being a bad contract, would you be better off getting a higher quality bad contract like Love? Obviously avoiding the bad contract if you can is the way to go, but one of the reasons AD wanted to leave was he didn't win nearly enough while he was here. I think the team wants Zion to experience winning in NOLA as soon as is reasonable.
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:56 pm to TigerinATL
Yes agreed. Make no mistake about it. We are competing this year for a playoff spot.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 2:03 pm to TigerinATL
If Love were to stay reasonably healthy and actually play, it wouldn't really be a bad contract. But that's the catch, right? I mean, I believe in Aaron Nelson, but I don't believe in him that much.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 4:05 pm to brmark70816
I think everybody would agree that Randle is maturing. I think the people disagree that his game does not fit, even remotely, with what we need as a team with Zion as our slasher, dunker, player.
Randle is just 24. He well probably get better. He would be a great pick up for someone like Golden State who has shooters in place and can have Randle as a 6th man to keep the points coming.
Randle is just 24. He well probably get better. He would be a great pick up for someone like Golden State who has shooters in place and can have Randle as a 6th man to keep the points coming.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 4:14 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
If Love were to stay reasonably healthy and actually play, it wouldn't really be a bad contract. But that's the catch, right? I mean, I believe in Aaron Nelson, but I don't believe in him that much.
If the contract was 2 and not 4 years I would sign right up. But that contract would be an anchor as it is currently constructed.
Cap room is all but gone, you risk running into a Gordon/Asik scenario with Ingram and Ball, and you take yourself out of the FA market in 2021 where some solid names come back available.
If we are truly looking at this from a 10-year perspective, not 1 or 2, Love doesn't make much sense.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 4:22 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
Obviously avoiding the bad contract if you can is the way to go, but one of the reasons AD wanted to leave was he didn't win nearly enough while he was here. I think the team wants Zion to experience winning in NOLA as soon as is reasonable.
And that is also what got fans and the front office wrongfully embracing the Demps method. AD is going to ball out early, therefore, let's accelerate the process and make win now moves.
I said it years back about AD, but the key to maximizing your chance at keeping Zion is being a contender by the middle of his second contract, not rushing to the playoffs in his first. Especially because the former sets you up to be in a lot of cap hell by the time that second contract period gets there.
I say let's be patient, this is a marathon, not a sprint. If we end up in the lottery again I don't think that is the worst outcome. But I wouldn't be rushing to hand out big contracts to guys off our time schedule like Randle or Mirotic.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 4:40 pm to Bronc
Griffin so far continues to stockpile assets which gives him the cover he needs to make those moves. Demps and every team that goes into Win Now mode to keep a star basically are out of spare assets killing their margin for error. If we trade for Love and need to move him in 2 years to create cap space because the next disgruntled star wants out, we have plenty of spare assets to make that happen.
I don’t think getting a high price good player in here to help Win Now and create a winning culture is a mistake. I just hope they can find a cheaper way to accomplish the same goal without killing the cap or burning too many trade pieces.
I don’t think getting a high price good player in here to help Win Now and create a winning culture is a mistake. I just hope they can find a cheaper way to accomplish the same goal without killing the cap or burning too many trade pieces.
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 6/22/19 at 4:48 pm to Lester Earl
Julius is gonna get over 20 mil. from some team. Good for him. Don’t want him here, though. Would be a terrible way to spend our cap.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 4:54 pm to TigerinATL
How much (if any) do you think the cap and tax threshold will increase in future years?
If there’s any meaningful increase, a contract like Love’s doesn’t seem nearly as bad.
If there’s any meaningful increase, a contract like Love’s doesn’t seem nearly as bad.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 4:59 pm to Philippines4LSU
This coming season the cap/tax projections are $109/$132. In 2020-21 the projections are $116/$141. That does help some, but 25% instead of 30% is still pretty significant and hard to move if you're not getting near All Star level production.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 5:17 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
Griffin so far continues to stockpile assets which gives him the cover he needs to make those moves. Demps and every team that goes into Win Now mode to keep a star basically are out of spare assets killing their margin for error. If we trade for Love and need to move him in 2 years to create cap space because the next disgruntled star wants out, we have plenty of spare assets to make that happen
That is certainly true and is the major pivot from Demps self made situation.
But it still begs the question of why?
I don’t think Love is enough of a difference maker right now, and I don’t think him as a veteran brings all that much that a Jared Dudley type couldn’t bring.
And he’s certainly not on our time schedule.
So for me I really hope we don’t do it.
I’m ok with bringing in a high price guy, if it is in the mold of a Redick style situation. Veteran guy on a large short contract that maintains your flexibility.when you start talking about Mirotic or Horford or 4 years in an inflated market, that’s when I am a hard no.
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 5:18 pm
Posted on 6/22/19 at 5:19 pm to TigerinATL
I've said it in other threads, so I'm beating a dead horse here, but I would much rather take on Adams over Love if Griff is dead set on acquiring a good vet on a bad deal. Adams' contract only has two years left, as opposed to four, and he was 10th in Defensive Win Shares this past season. Also, he played in 80, 80, 76, and 80 games the last four seasons.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 5:32 pm to kpop1
Randle has started almost every game he has been in. He is a borderline top 10 PF and a top 20 big. To try to relegate him to the bench or a 6th man role makes no sense. To let a guy who wants to be here walk for nothing isn't a smart thing to do. Everybody keeps naming bigs that Randle is better and younger than, and they want to give them the same or more money than it would take to resign Randle. Honestly I don't get it.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 5:40 pm to brmark70816
Because his skill set doesn’t fit alongside Zion and he’s a defensive liability.
Pels need a guy that can stretch the floor, plays D, rebounds, and can distribute.
That does not sound like Julius Randle.
Pels need a guy that can stretch the floor, plays D, rebounds, and can distribute.
That does not sound like Julius Randle.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News