Started By
Message

re: Mirotic or Julius Randle?

Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:24 pm to
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:24 pm to
Right.

The health part makes it a no go, but his shooting and passing aren't going away as he ages.

It's at least an interesting thought experiment
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38658 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:28 pm to
I would ask love if I ever met him whether he regrets signing that deal with CLE.
That’s sounds ridiculous but he’s already made 100MM...

basketball nirvana awaits him on any number of good teams, at decent money.
he would be the ultimate hired gun a la big shot bob
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 1:29 pm
Posted by Dogstar
Member since Jun 2019
372 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:28 pm to
Can you imagine the best two outlet passers in the league, Love & Ball, on the same team as fricking Zion and wide receiver Hayes!?
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 1:29 pm
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38658 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:30 pm to
it would be incredible to watch
Posted by Mad Scientist26
Member since Jul 2018
1942 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:30 pm to
Love is a good fit too. It’s just his contract is crazy but I guess it can equal out with Zion rookie contract.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61442 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

I would argue paying that guy, even a huge sum for 4 years, is valuable and worth it. I would argue it can be more valuable than cycling through older, cheaper options. And they can do it and still have flexibility.


That's why I posed the question I did in my first post in this thread. If Niko will be overpaid to the point of being a bad contract, would you be better off getting a higher quality bad contract like Love? Obviously avoiding the bad contract if you can is the way to go, but one of the reasons AD wanted to leave was he didn't win nearly enough while he was here. I think the team wants Zion to experience winning in NOLA as soon as is reasonable.
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 1:44 pm
Posted by Mad Scientist26
Member since Jul 2018
1942 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 1:56 pm to
Yes agreed. Make no mistake about it. We are competing this year for a playoff spot.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17796 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 2:03 pm to
If Love were to stay reasonably healthy and actually play, it wouldn't really be a bad contract. But that's the catch, right? I mean, I believe in Aaron Nelson, but I don't believe in him that much.
Posted by kpop1
Member since Jan 2018
1648 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 4:05 pm to
I think everybody would agree that Randle is maturing. I think the people disagree that his game does not fit, even remotely, with what we need as a team with Zion as our slasher, dunker, player.

Randle is just 24. He well probably get better. He would be a great pick up for someone like Golden State who has shooters in place and can have Randle as a 6th man to keep the points coming.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

If Love were to stay reasonably healthy and actually play, it wouldn't really be a bad contract. But that's the catch, right? I mean, I believe in Aaron Nelson, but I don't believe in him that much.




If the contract was 2 and not 4 years I would sign right up. But that contract would be an anchor as it is currently constructed.

Cap room is all but gone, you risk running into a Gordon/Asik scenario with Ingram and Ball, and you take yourself out of the FA market in 2021 where some solid names come back available.

If we are truly looking at this from a 10-year perspective, not 1 or 2, Love doesn't make much sense.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

Obviously avoiding the bad contract if you can is the way to go, but one of the reasons AD wanted to leave was he didn't win nearly enough while he was here. I think the team wants Zion to experience winning in NOLA as soon as is reasonable.


And that is also what got fans and the front office wrongfully embracing the Demps method. AD is going to ball out early, therefore, let's accelerate the process and make win now moves.

I said it years back about AD, but the key to maximizing your chance at keeping Zion is being a contender by the middle of his second contract, not rushing to the playoffs in his first. Especially because the former sets you up to be in a lot of cap hell by the time that second contract period gets there.

I say let's be patient, this is a marathon, not a sprint. If we end up in the lottery again I don't think that is the worst outcome. But I wouldn't be rushing to hand out big contracts to guys off our time schedule like Randle or Mirotic.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61442 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 4:40 pm to
Griffin so far continues to stockpile assets which gives him the cover he needs to make those moves. Demps and every team that goes into Win Now mode to keep a star basically are out of spare assets killing their margin for error. If we trade for Love and need to move him in 2 years to create cap space because the next disgruntled star wants out, we have plenty of spare assets to make that happen.

I don’t think getting a high price good player in here to help Win Now and create a winning culture is a mistake. I just hope they can find a cheaper way to accomplish the same goal without killing the cap or burning too many trade pieces.
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 4:53 pm
Posted by CocoLoco
Member since Jan 2012
29108 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 4:48 pm to
Julius is gonna get over 20 mil. from some team. Good for him. Don’t want him here, though. Would be a terrible way to spend our cap.
Posted by Philippines4LSU
Member since May 2018
8789 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 4:54 pm to
How much (if any) do you think the cap and tax threshold will increase in future years?

If there’s any meaningful increase, a contract like Love’s doesn’t seem nearly as bad.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61442 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 4:59 pm to
This coming season the cap/tax projections are $109/$132. In 2020-21 the projections are $116/$141. That does help some, but 25% instead of 30% is still pretty significant and hard to move if you're not getting near All Star level production.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

Griffin so far continues to stockpile assets which gives him the cover he needs to make those moves. Demps and every team that goes into Win Now mode to keep a star basically are out of spare assets killing their margin for error. If we trade for Love and need to move him in 2 years to create cap space because the next disgruntled star wants out, we have plenty of spare assets to make that happen


That is certainly true and is the major pivot from Demps self made situation.

But it still begs the question of why?

I don’t think Love is enough of a difference maker right now, and I don’t think him as a veteran brings all that much that a Jared Dudley type couldn’t bring.

And he’s certainly not on our time schedule.

So for me I really hope we don’t do it.

I’m ok with bringing in a high price guy, if it is in the mold of a Redick style situation. Veteran guy on a large short contract that maintains your flexibility.when you start talking about Mirotic or Horford or 4 years in an inflated market, that’s when I am a hard no.
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 5:18 pm
Posted by HickfawJim1
Member since Sep 2013
438 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 5:19 pm to
I've said it in other threads, so I'm beating a dead horse here, but I would much rather take on Adams over Love if Griff is dead set on acquiring a good vet on a bad deal. Adams' contract only has two years left, as opposed to four, and he was 10th in Defensive Win Shares this past season. Also, he played in 80, 80, 76, and 80 games the last four seasons.
Posted by Philippines4LSU
Member since May 2018
8789 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 5:22 pm to
Thanks ATL.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9759 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 5:32 pm to
Randle has started almost every game he has been in. He is a borderline top 10 PF and a top 20 big. To try to relegate him to the bench or a 6th man role makes no sense. To let a guy who wants to be here walk for nothing isn't a smart thing to do. Everybody keeps naming bigs that Randle is better and younger than, and they want to give them the same or more money than it would take to resign Randle. Honestly I don't get it.
Posted by BallHawk
Orlando
Member since Jul 2011
5735 posts
Posted on 6/22/19 at 5:40 pm to
Because his skill set doesn’t fit alongside Zion and he’s a defensive liability.

Pels need a guy that can stretch the floor, plays D, rebounds, and can distribute.

That does not sound like Julius Randle.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram