How many of you still want Zion long term?

Looking at how much Zion raises your ceiling when he plays, I think you have to stick with him for now.

There are still quite a few things he can do to reduce his injury risk like shooting more and putting even more effort into his body. LeBron spends $1.5 million a year on his body. Zion needs to have that level of personal commitment to staying healthy.

quote:

---

How many of you still want Zion long term?

---

Zion for 50 games gives you a ceiling of NBA title contenders.

Issue is, can you stay afloat for the other 30 games

The war chest is important for us to load up on cheap young talent to replace other guys though

He’s been historically good offensively when playing. Even his defense got up to a decent level this season. It definitely is a bummer that he has been injury prone, but I don’t think there’s any medical reason to give up on a player unless they’re having recurring similar injuries, which Zion has not really had. Greg Oden’s foot, Brandon Roy’s knee, Larry Bird’s back, for example, are career enders. I personally think Zion has just been super unlucky. I don’t even blame his size, since he’s getting injuries that aren’t “big guy” injuries. Anyone can tweak a hamstring and have trouble getting back, skinny tall guys get the foot injury Zion got, and all sorts of sized guys have meniscus injuries.

The problem is, that if you do give him up, you risk watching him be less unlucky, and be an MVP, league fricking MVP candidate on another team

Me, and I hope he starts taking his body more seriously moving forward with the frequent injuries. He needs to get in the LeBron program.

For sure you want Big Husky here long term, additionally with BI. Thats the ticket, any change represents a setback and rebuild in terms of championship aspirations.

Given that, Zion as well as BI, need to be better off-ball for availability and longevity purposes. Zion, in particular puts way too much stress on himself physically with his style of play.

Zion and BI are elite finishers and getting them off-ball opportunities to finish along with a healthy but diminished on-ball role would, imo, do wonders for their availability. Those two, in a very limited sample, have shown to be an overwhelming force.

The only way I'd consider parting with Zion if it meant you could get someone who, when healthy, makes you a Finals contender.

I don't think that's possible.

quote:

---

The only way I'd consider parting with Zion if it meant you could get someone who, when healthy, makes you a Finals contender.

I don't think that's possible.

---

Probably not

Ultimately, next season is the make or break year. In his 4 seasons he's played 24 games, 61 games(of 72), 0 games, and 29 games and looking like at best he'll get to around 40 games.

If he puts up another 40 games or less next season, it'll be time to push the panic button. Now what does that even mean, I honestly don't know. He won't have the trade value to do much with if he's hurt all year again next season, I just don't see it. We basically just have to ride it out and hope for the best.

But if he does have another 40 game season next year and you punt on him with a trade that returns 30 cents on the dollar, what's the point?

You go from injured team that has a chance to be a title contender when healthy to healthy team that has no chance to be a title contender.

Yea I mean shel covered that . . . and I don’t know what it means. Other than if we get another sub 50 game season from Zion next year you need to turn the page on thinking this group can win a title. Does that mean shipping Zion for pennies? If those pennies are expiring contracts maybe.

Unless he develops a chronic injury, you roll with him in hopes that he gets over the injury bug. His injuries have all been pretty unlucky types especially onebhe suffered this season. As long as he can stay away from ligament injuries, I'm not going to panic just yet.