Started By
Message

Twister - time has abused it badly

Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:25 pm
Posted by theballguy
Colorado Springs, CO
Member since Oct 2011
2942 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:25 pm
Twister.

Just turned it on the other day, and it was much worse than I ever remembered.

When it first came out, it had a certain appeal and was somewhat entertaining. I think I saw it in the theaters. My wife (at the time) and I had a close encounter with a tornado a few years before that scared the shite out of us lol and so, I was kind of fascinated with them. Anyways, even back then with that movie, the characters felt overly dramatic and exaggerated bordering on caricatures which is how movies are I know but I thought they were annoying somewhat even then.

So, moving to today, and the special effects, which were once considered passable, now look painfully outdated. The CGI that was once considered advanced now appears laughable and unconvincing, a reminder of how far visual effects have come. It seems much worse than a lot of tech-made movies who still seem to be watchable now.

Current understanding of tornadoes has also improved a lot, making the movie's depiction of them seem even more unrealistic and absurd. The explanations given in the film now come across as pure fiction, almost as if the characters were making things up on the spot, lacking any semblance of scientific accuracy.

Philip Seymour Hoffman's (RIP in peace) performance in this film has to be his worst. His character was over-the-top and cringe-worthy and way far from the roles he's known for.

Helen Hunt was just as bad. Her performance was forced and unconvincing. The lack of chemistry between her and Bill Paxton was obvious. It seems like they had never met before filming. She seemed like she didn't want to be in that movie at all. These days, I don't blame her.

Jami Gertz looked much older than she was, which is unfortunate because she is quite attractive even now almost fricking 30 years later. Her character seemed out of place and unnecessary. It didn't add anything to the movie. Helen Hunt did at least look decent though.

I couldn't watch it for more than 20 minutes before I had to turn it off. The film now feels like an ancient relic of the past (I must be an ancient relic of the past too lol). Too many flaws and the advancements in both science and filmmaking. It has definitely not aged well.
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
156117 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:28 pm to
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
4505 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:28 pm to


Posted by Honest Tune
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2011
15983 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:32 pm to
You couldn’t watch more than 20 minutes of Twister? The cheesy shite is at least 45 minutes in.
Posted by cfish140
BR
Member since Aug 2007
7308 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:34 pm to
Caught it on AMC the other day myself. When he confronts Cary Elwes is hilarious. “What’s your malfunction man!”
Posted by theballguy
Colorado Springs, CO
Member since Oct 2011
2942 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:34 pm to
I skipped around it. And I got to see all I ever wanted. or didn't want. Just a really bad movie.
Posted by This GUN for HIRE
Member since May 2022
3057 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:43 pm to
Your post

Posted by MemphisGuy
Member since Nov 2023
3930 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

theballguy
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32172 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

theballguy






If you don’t like twister then you have no sense of fun
Posted by theballguy
Colorado Springs, CO
Member since Oct 2011
2942 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:47 pm to
nah, it's fricking terrible
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32172 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Cary Elwes



Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
59655 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

It has definitely not aged well.

Call me crazy but I thought that was the appeal of it. The bad acting, cheesy lines, campy graphics, etc. but fun even back then.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81895 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:54 pm to
This may be an all top 10 terrible take on this board.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32172 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:55 pm to



You live your life in it.
Posted by GatorPA84
PNW
Member since Sep 2016
4878 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:56 pm to
Clearly you have never been in “the suck zone!!”
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46710 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 3:10 pm to
God damned Jonas going out and getting SPONSORS like a goon
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
48971 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 3:44 pm to
OP is a miserable person.
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
25292 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 3:48 pm to
OP must be a blast at parties
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
28052 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

So, moving to today, and the special effects, which were once considered passable, now look painfully outdated. The CGI that was once considered advanced now appears laughable and unconvincing, a reminder of how far visual effects have come. It seems much worse than a lot of tech-made movies who still seem to be watchable now.

This is equivalent to claiming "Saving Private Ryan" is a terrible movie now, because it doesnt include all the upgraded weapons and tech found on todays battlefields and war movies.



Twister is fantastic for the storm chasing era that it represents
Posted by TigerDeacon
West Monroe, LA
Member since Sep 2003
29409 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 4:05 pm to
That's an awful lot of hate to type out a page on a 30 year old movie.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram