- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Dungeons & Dragons Movie Intentionally Emasculates Its Leading Men. . .
Posted on 3/6/23 at 2:50 pm to Tigerfan56
Posted on 3/6/23 at 2:50 pm to Tigerfan56
quote:Almost all of the military personnel are from the South
Your side, presumably being the Deep South, which has less money, less intelligence, and more obesity than every other part of the country
But if a national divorce comes to be, it will be red/blue, not North/South. Which will mean Dems will only control certain large population centers
Plus you would be completely separated from half your forces. Virtually everything between the 2 coasts is deeeeeeeeeep red, also adding Alaska.
Virtually all oil, natural gas, and coal comes from deep red states. Good luck running tanks and planes on Solar.
Not to mention, gun ownership.
This post was edited on 3/6/23 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 3/6/23 at 3:08 pm to Locoguan0
quote:
It is a DnD party... The bard and the wizard are not going to be tanks. The druid, the barbarian, and the paladin are.
yeah, I understand people getting mad about it but from a D&D perspective it makes perfect sense. Women and Men have the exact same attributes in DnD. There is no bonus to making your tank a male vs a female. They have the same strength and hit points.
Posted on 3/6/23 at 3:15 pm to Corinthians420
They didn't say filling class roles or tanking.
They said they "intentionally emasculated" the men, to feature the women.
Instead of making the women ALSO strong, they consciously decided to intentionally emasculate the men in the service of the female characters.
Pine had to be reminded that he had to look sort of heroic sometimes, instead of a bumbling submissive.
They said they "intentionally emasculated" the men, to feature the women.
Instead of making the women ALSO strong, they consciously decided to intentionally emasculate the men in the service of the female characters.
Pine had to be reminded that he had to look sort of heroic sometimes, instead of a bumbling submissive.
This post was edited on 3/6/23 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 3/6/23 at 3:49 pm to 3nOut
quote:
to be fair, most of the current girls into video games and D&D are also showing their boobs on OnlyFans.
…
Not the ones I play with, so I don’t know what to tell you.
Posted on 3/6/23 at 3:51 pm to Roaad
Can we not delve into PoliBoard dumbassery bullshite in here?
Posted on 3/6/23 at 6:09 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
This you?
Remember that time when I posted a legitimate comment about the garbage that is today's Hollywood, and instead of forming an intelligent, coherent response, you instead posted a completely unrelated shot from SouthPark as some sort of 'massive' own?
Yeah, that was awesome.
Stay in the shallow end. The water is clearly too deep for you.
Posted on 3/6/23 at 7:21 pm to 3nOut
quote:
i played D&D and magic well into HS
I did as well, but if you poke around for some of the recent changes Wizards of the Coast has made to the system/canon, I don't think you'd be pleased.
Does the Drizzt character, for example, even have any meaning, if you just declare Drow aren't mostly evil? There are any examples of this, I think starting around 3.5, but it just soured me on caring. I'll just read more Warhammer 40K, which is the antithesis of nearly everything WoTC has been doing over the past years.
Posted on 3/6/23 at 9:41 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
did as well, but if you poke around for some of the recent changes Wizards of the Coast has made to the system/canon, I don't think you'd be pleased.
I have two teenagers in sports. I have 0 time for such frivolity.
Not knocking it. Just the life I have.
quote:
Does the Drizzt character, for example, even have any meaning, if you just declare Drow aren't mostly evil? There are any examples of this, I think starting around 3.5, but it just soured me on caring. I'll just read more Warhammer 40K, which is the antithesis of nearly everything WoTC has been doing over the past years.
I saw that Henry Cavill has moved on to this after his Witcher departure. My understanding was that the Witcher showrunners kept deviating too far from source material in the name of “woke” so he couldn’t stay on board.
I don’t know much about warhammer but I heard it’s pretty devoid of the modern mind virus.
This post was edited on 3/6/23 at 9:54 pm
Posted on 3/6/23 at 11:08 pm to Roaad
quote:
soy boys know nothing about masculinity. so, not really shocked

Popular
Back to top


1









