Started By
Message

re: The Case Against Adnan Syed - HBO-

Posted on 3/22/19 at 9:58 am to
Posted by ShamelessPel
Metairie
Member since Apr 2013
12719 posts
Posted on 3/22/19 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Gotcha. I’m not noticing who posts what






We're good. I think people think I'm arguing for Adnan's innocence just because I don't trust Jay at all. I don't think Adnan's defense lawyer did Adnan any favors though. Whatever clips I've heard basically sounded like she was literally screaming at Jay in the witness box while he kept his composure. Game. Set. Match. Jay. A defense attorney got outwitted by a 20 year old drug dealer. And they paid her over 100k and got scammed out of more for that masterpiece she put out there.

I think there are enough holes to poke with what I know that Adnan could have been wandering the streets today, but I'm missing a large chunk of information admittedly that 6 weeks of a trial has in it. It would have been interesting to see how this played out if Adnan was defended by someone other than a raving lunatic. I'm sure the tactic was to get Jay riled up and have him slip and lose composure. Jay just flat owned her though and flipped the script entirely.
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21652 posts
Posted on 3/22/19 at 11:14 am to
quote:

It would have been interesting to see how this played out if Adnan was defended by someone other than a raving lunatic. I'm sure the tactic was to get Jay riled up and have him slip and lose composure. Jay just flat owned her though and flipped the script entirely.


I think a big reason for the conviction was the mistrial. The jurors that were polled all said they were leaning towards acquittal, and, if I'm not mistaken, Jay was finished testifying by the time the mistrial was granted. Urick and Jay had time to prepare for Gutierrez's strategy the 2nd time, and I'd guess that's why he made her look so bad. Some of the clips of his testimony are cringeworthy with the way Gutierrez acts towards Jay.
Posted by ShamelessPel
Metairie
Member since Apr 2013
12719 posts
Posted on 3/22/19 at 11:29 am to
quote:

I think a big reason for the conviction was the mistrial. The jurors that were polled all said they were leaning towards acquittal, and, if I'm not mistaken, Jay was finished testifying by the time the mistrial was granted. Urick and Jay had time to prepare for Gutierrez's strategy the 2nd time, and I'd guess that's why he made her look so bad. Some of the clips of his testimony are cringeworthy with the way Gutierrez acts towards Jay.


Agreed. It certainly felt like she didn't put any extra effort into the 2nd trial. Kind of felt like she was going through the motions with the extra workload.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
34187 posts
Posted on 3/22/19 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

I've only read a page or two in here and quickly realized that a lot of the legal talk is over my head.

But a lot of the talk in here is about how bad his defense was. I thought in criminal Adnan said he was pleased with his defense and thought she did a good job fighting for him. There were some clips serial played where she went about a few things the wrong way but I'm sure that happens a lot in major trials, taking the wrong angle on questioning certain people.

A lot of the evidence is new so she didnt have that available, and Adnan thought she did a good job. Are people reading like court documents that show like a mass amount of things she messed up on or are people just being extremely critical bc they know more now than she did. Doesnt seem fair to her.

That's an honest question, not an argument.
Posted by Tiger Voodoo
Champs 03 07 09 11(fack) 19!!!
Member since Mar 2007
21782 posts
Posted on 3/22/19 at 3:32 pm to
Adnan himself said he felt she did a good job.

She clearly was aggressive in her cross examinations, something that doesn't always play well with a jury, but certainly not ineffective assistance of counsel, as aggressive questioning is commonplace if not ever present and just as often blows up a state's case.


For as grating as she sounds on tape, it could have felt different sitting in the room. I've seen some absolutely insufferable attorneys win over juries, so I don't buy into the irritating voice nonsense. And Serial is picking a few moments to show out of a six week trial. Just more clever production to raise eyebrows imo.


That said, the real sticking point is the fact that she was in the early stages of MS? I believe, and not long after the trial she accepted disbarrment amid multiple complaints about her performance (Adnan did not file a complaint with the Bar and his case was not reviewed).



That, combined with her failure to contact the potential, yet imo not convincing or all that relevant, alibi witness gives plenty of ammo for one to argue her performance was prejudicially ineffective.


She died due to complications from the disease just a few years later, which is why we don't get her account to defend herself.



By all accounts she was a fierce advocate in her day, but the timing of her career ending suddenly not long after has been a big point of attack in his appeals and post conviction proceedings


ETA: As for the new "evidence" there really isn't much. We have some new accounts and new arguments, but most of what the audience finds so compelling may not even be admissible, and just more about how well they present their narrative, which they wouldn't be able to do in the same way even if a new trial has been granted.
This post was edited on 3/22/19 at 3:50 pm
Posted by Tiger Voodoo
Champs 03 07 09 11(fack) 19!!!
Member since Mar 2007
21782 posts
Posted on 3/22/19 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

 think a big reason for the conviction was the mistrial. The jurors that were polled all said they were leaning towards acquittal, and, if I'm not mistaken, Jay was finished testifying by the time the mistrial was granted. 




do you have a link for that?

I don't remember a whole lot about the first trial, but you're right in that could certainly give the state an advantage if Jay had already testified.

Of course it could have given the defense the same advantage by knowing their full presentation and maybe even seeing the cell phone expert.


And obviously Jay couldn't just change his testimony in the second trial. His previous statements could have been used to impeach his credibility if he simply changed his story the second time.

Even his previous statements to detectives would have been brought up and the jury was obviously not persuaded or didn't find the inconsistencies to be overly concerning.
This post was edited on 3/22/19 at 4:14 pm
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
34187 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Adnan himself said he felt she did a good job.



I feel like this says a lot. He praised her pretty well and serial certainly didnt give that part much runtime.

quote:

She clearly was aggressive in her cross examinations, something that doesn't always play well with a jury, but certainly not ineffective assistance of counsel, as aggressive questioning is commonplace if not ever present and just as often blows up a state's case.


For as grating as she sounds on tape, it could have felt different sitting in the room. I've seen some absolutely insufferable attorneys win over juries, so I don't buy into the irritating voice nonsense. And Serial is picking a few moments to show out of a six week trial. Just more clever production to raise eyebrows imo.


So I pretty early on in the podcast and by the end felt like Adnan did it, based on a number of things he himself said. But if I'm watching a show like Dateline (I'm 32, I guess I'm at an age now where i can admit that i love that show), one of the most frustrating things to me is when a detective uses the "that's not how I or other people would have reacted or said" reasoning. Bc who cares how you would react, is every body supposed to react you? But, on the other hand, I dont think it's fair to say the attorney didnt do her job just based off the podcast/show. You head a lot more from Adnan than you do clips from the attorney.

quote:

She died due to complications from the disease just a few years later


Yikes, didnt know that, or I missed it.

quote:

That, combined with her failure to contact the potential, yet imo not convincing or all that relevant, alibi witness gives plenty of ammo for one to argue her performance was prejudicially ineffective.


The girl that saw him in the library? The family didn't even acknowledge her, how would she have known? Unless you interview everybody in the school. Or is it somebody else I'm missing remembering?
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18315 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

Adnan himself said he felt she did a good job.



Very subjective. Good job at what? Additionally, if he is innocent, she objectively didn’t do a good job
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
34187 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

Very subjective. Good job at what?


Being a lawyer, based off the word of the guy she was representing.

quote:

Additionally, if he is innocent, she objectively didn’t do a good job


To do a good job you have to win the trail? So every person who's innocent and is convicted, that means their lawyer didnt do a good job at representing them?
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18315 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

To do a good job you have to win the trail? So every person who's innocent and is convicted, that means their lawyer didnt do a good job at representing them?


Are my standards to high? Hope you’d feel the same way if you were an innocent man on trial
Posted by 225bred
COYS
Member since Jun 2011
20386 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:56 pm to
Is there a new episode tonight?
Posted by shamrock
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
3620 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 6:59 pm to
Oh, he’s guilty..
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 9:18 am to
Watched the first episode of the HBO series this weekend. Did anyone else find it extremely odd and creepy that Don pursued Hae's friend(forget her name, Debbie?) soon after the murder and trial?
Posted by Philzilla2k
Member since Oct 2017
11048 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Watched the first episode of the HBO series this weekend. Did anyone else find it extremely odd and creepy that Don pursued Hae's friend(forget her name, Debbie?) soon after the murder and trial?

yes
Posted by 225bred
COYS
Member since Jun 2011
20386 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 11:28 am to
Probably grief stricken and not thinking clearly.

I mean.. he went from Hae to the below average looking black chick...
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
29212 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 1:05 pm to
I listened to the undisclosed podcast with Susan Simpson and man she is 1,000 MPH in real life too like in the podcast .

But they’re doing a good job of really showing there’s a ton of doubt with jays story and the phone records stuff
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
34187 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Are my standards to high?


No. Just completely unrealistic.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
98918 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

Watched the first episode of the HBO series this weekend. Did anyone else find it extremely odd and creepy that Don pursued Hae's friend(forget her name, Debbie?) soon after the murder and trial?


Granted, I didn’t listen to the podcast so I don’t know all of the details but dude seemed like a creep show himself.

I also find it weird they don’t have any physical evidence linking Jay or Adnan to Hae’s body.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
34187 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Granted, I didn’t listen to the podcast so I don’t know all of the details but dude seemed like a creep show himself.


To me, with the podcast, Don was completely normal. There wasnt a lot of Don run time but he seemed pretty normal to me and I dont think the podcast stayed with him long because there wasnt much on him.
Posted by Neauxla_Tiger
Member since Feb 2015
1870 posts
Posted on 3/25/19 at 1:50 pm to
It's been a while since I listened to Serial, so forgive me if I'm lost on the timeline, but did they ever spend time on the location of the murder allegedly being the Best Buy parking lot in the middle of the afternoon in a pretty large city? I would imagine that to be a pretty busy parking lot. I understand it supposedly happened inside the car, but still seems like it would be hard for not a single bystander to notice a huge commotion and then a body being moved into a trunk (although he could've gone somewhere else to do this if the timeline permitted). Of course this doesn't prove it didn't happen, but I just find it strange that's been accepted as fact because Jay claims Adnan told him that. Was he supposedly in Hae's car at this time and then Jay came to get him and they moved the body to Adnan's trunk? Just trying to make sense of how this supposedly happened without anybody seeing them.

ETA - If it was supposedly pre-meditated then it seems bizarre to pick a busy parking lot. Which makes me think it either wasn't pre-meditated, or didn't happen like we've been told

Also, count me in the crowd that doesn't think it's that strange for him to not remember where he was for that 1-2 hours. He had track practice every day after school with some time to kill in between, right? Usually it's not enough time to do much of anything besides homework or dicking around with friends, none of which is particularly memorable days or weeks later. Especially if there's some slight variance in what you do every day for months. I understand he got a phone call from the police that day, but were they grilling him for alibis that day, or just asking if he heard from Hae? I would expect to remember the phone call, but not necessarily to remember the minutiae of the day if there wasn't any reason for you to think it was relevant at the time. Plus, this is back before everybody had cell phones and social media, so it wasn't that crazy for someone to not be heard from for a day. By the time the police called him she was only unaccounted for for a few hours, right? I don't think I would have been freaking out, especially if they weren't dating anymore. Obviously that doesn't mean Adnan would react the same way I think I would, but I don't think his foggy memory is that concerning, and as others have said, you can argue he would have had an alibi prepared ahead of time if he was guilty and knew he'd be questioned. Just speculating..

FTR I lean toward he is guilty (mostly because it's hard to pin it on anybody else), but I enjoy arguing about this stuff
This post was edited on 3/25/19 at 2:29 pm
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram