- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/6/16 at 12:46 pm to StickD
quote:Dude, the FBI just read your post.
I don't want to be in the state and FBI's database
Posted on 1/6/16 at 12:52 pm to LesGeaux45
I'm only 5 episodes in but man, it's like they moved Mississippi up to Canada and their accents changed
Posted on 1/6/16 at 1:54 pm to drizztiger
I'm banking on TD.com being a deep web wasteland, not on the FBI's radar.
And I still don't want to rip on how bad judges are in the system, family courts included.
And I still don't want to rip on how bad judges are in the system, family courts included.
Posted on 1/6/16 at 1:57 pm to StickD
quote:Nah man, the NSA collects everything and shares with FBI. This site isn't encrypted, clear text packets. Personally I am a huge fan of all law enforcement.
I'm banking on TD.com being a deep web wasteland, not on the FBI's radar.
Posted on 1/6/16 at 2:42 pm to Pilot Tiger
quote:
I'm only 5 episodes in but man, it's like they moved Mississippi up to Canada and their accents changed
Yeah, a twang away from full on Canadian accent.
Posted on 1/6/16 at 7:42 pm to tiggerthetooth
So I would recommend that folks read the information that was not put in the series. Now I'm really confused LINK
Posted on 1/6/16 at 7:51 pm to JBeam
None of that is new and it has all been hit on in numerous threads. The only thing I want to point out to you is dna testing does not tell you how the dna got there. So whenYou read "dna from Avery's sweat", take it withs grain of salt.
Posted on 1/6/16 at 8:40 pm to JBeam
quote:
So I would recommend that folks read the information that was not put in the series.
That has already been posted a few times and has been shown to contain information that is somewhere between inconsequential and made up.
Posted on 1/6/16 at 9:10 pm to JBeam
quote:A lot of those points are irrelevant (he owns porn), were provided by the morally corrupt DA, or were so unsubstantiated THAT judge wouldn't allow it.
So I would recommend that folks read the information that was not put in the series. Now I'm really confused
Worse yet, that journalist is quite the one unethical herself. LINKIt's quite ironic to reach an ethics course, then turn around and have an affair with a police chief while continently failing to disclose that while writing an overly positive expose on him. It really shows her integrity.
Worse yet, she was part of the problem with the case in the first place, when as a journalist, she blindly accepted the state's case.
The kicker though is that she just wrote an article defending Kachinsky. This "journalist" doesn't value integrity, but she sure does love those state related officials, even when they are proven scumbags.
Wait nevermind Avery had PORN. OMG! How could the documentary leave that out?
This post was edited on 1/6/16 at 9:14 pm
Posted on 1/6/16 at 9:15 pm to 13SaintTiger
quote:Yeah. That seems to be highly misrepresented.
The only thing I want to point out to you is dna testing does not tell you how the dna got there
Posted on 1/6/16 at 9:16 pm to JBeam
quote:
3. The car key unearthed in Avery's residence had DNA from his sweat on it
Dean Strang addresses that point exactly
quote:
2. Avery and his girlfriend had a less than rosy relationship at times
A magazine is their source?
The author of that link you posted also had an affair with the Milwaukee Police Chief. She has wrote several articles speaking for the law enforcement involved.
LINK
This post was edited on 1/6/16 at 9:17 pm
Posted on 1/6/16 at 9:29 pm to tiggerthetooth
quote:Not in this link he didn't.
Dean Strang addresses that point exactly
Posted on 1/6/16 at 10:27 pm to ell_13
Brendan definitely needs a new trial because of his "supposed" confession.
Even higher, were those who had a low IQ or were mentally challenged...
Mentally retarded people are particularly vulnerable to being wrongfully convicted. With their desire to please authority figures, they are very susceptible to being influenced during interrogation and often ""confess"" to crimes they did not commit.
David Vasquez, Virginia
Convicted: 1985
Exonerated: 1989
David Vasquez was arrested for the murder of a woman who was killed in her Arlington County, Virginia home. She was sexually assaulted and then hung. Vasquez, who is borderline mentally retarded, had reportedly confessed to the crime, allegedly supplying details not released to the public.
Vasquez' attorneys argued that the interrogations were tainted because of his lower than normal intelligence.
Vasquez' innocence, and limited mental capacity, was demonstrated by his interrogation by the police.
The following is an excerpt from the interrogation of Vasquez by the police.
Detective 1: Did she tell you to tie her hands behind her back?
Vasquez: Ah, if she did, I did.
Detective 2: Whatcha use?
Vasquez: The ropes?
Detective 2: No, not the ropes. Whatcha use?
Vasquez: Only my belt.
Detective 2: No, not your belt... Remember being out in the sunroom, the room that sits out to the back of the house? ...and what did you cut down? To use?
Vasquez: That, uh, clothesline?
Detective 2: No, it wasn't a clothesline, it was something like a clothesline. What was it? By the window? Think about the Venetian blinds, David. Remember cutting the Venetian blind cords?
Vasquez: Ah, it's the same as rope?
Detective 2: Yeah.
Detective 1: Okay, now tell us how it went, David -- tell us how you did it.
Vasquez: She told me to grab the knife, and, and, stab her, that's all.
Detective 2: (voice raised) David, no, David.
Vasquez: If it did happen, and I did it, and my fingerprints were on it...
Detective 2: (slamming his hand on the table and yelling) You hung her!
Vasquez: What?
Detective 2: You hung her!
Vasquez: Okay, so I hung her.
Because of this "confession," David Vasquez spent five years in prison before he was pardoned.
quote:- Innocence Project
Astonishingly, more than 1 out of 4 people wrongfully convicted but later exonerated by DNA evidence made a false confession or incriminating statement.
Even higher, were those who had a low IQ or were mentally challenged...
Mentally retarded people are particularly vulnerable to being wrongfully convicted. With their desire to please authority figures, they are very susceptible to being influenced during interrogation and often ""confess"" to crimes they did not commit.
David Vasquez, Virginia
Convicted: 1985
Exonerated: 1989
David Vasquez was arrested for the murder of a woman who was killed in her Arlington County, Virginia home. She was sexually assaulted and then hung. Vasquez, who is borderline mentally retarded, had reportedly confessed to the crime, allegedly supplying details not released to the public.
Vasquez' attorneys argued that the interrogations were tainted because of his lower than normal intelligence.
Vasquez' innocence, and limited mental capacity, was demonstrated by his interrogation by the police.
The following is an excerpt from the interrogation of Vasquez by the police.
Detective 1: Did she tell you to tie her hands behind her back?
Vasquez: Ah, if she did, I did.
Detective 2: Whatcha use?
Vasquez: The ropes?
Detective 2: No, not the ropes. Whatcha use?
Vasquez: Only my belt.
Detective 2: No, not your belt... Remember being out in the sunroom, the room that sits out to the back of the house? ...and what did you cut down? To use?
Vasquez: That, uh, clothesline?
Detective 2: No, it wasn't a clothesline, it was something like a clothesline. What was it? By the window? Think about the Venetian blinds, David. Remember cutting the Venetian blind cords?
Vasquez: Ah, it's the same as rope?
Detective 2: Yeah.
Detective 1: Okay, now tell us how it went, David -- tell us how you did it.
Vasquez: She told me to grab the knife, and, and, stab her, that's all.
Detective 2: (voice raised) David, no, David.
Vasquez: If it did happen, and I did it, and my fingerprints were on it...
Detective 2: (slamming his hand on the table and yelling) You hung her!
Vasquez: What?
Detective 2: You hung her!
Vasquez: Okay, so I hung her.
Because of this "confession," David Vasquez spent five years in prison before he was pardoned.
Posted on 1/6/16 at 10:27 pm to ell_13
quote:
Not in this link he didn't.
Sorry, this one.
Go to 9:15 mark to hear him talk about the sweat. Dean Strang starts at 6:00
This post was edited on 1/6/16 at 10:33 pm
Posted on 1/6/16 at 11:20 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
As terrible as this documentary made me feel for Steven Avery, I finished the final episode feeling the worst for Brendan Dassey.
This poor fricking kid. He's mentally challenged and he had to admit on the stand during his murder trial that the reason he lost weight was because he was being bullied and his first (and only) girlfriend dumped him because of it. And the piece of shite prosecutors used it against him. That honestly damn near brought me to tears.
I obviously hope Steven Avery gets another shot at redemption, but Dassey needs to be given some hope right now. His conviction is just sickening. His stupidity was taken advantage of and they put him in jail because of it. To me, that is the most troubling part of the whole documentary.
This poor fricking kid. He's mentally challenged and he had to admit on the stand during his murder trial that the reason he lost weight was because he was being bullied and his first (and only) girlfriend dumped him because of it. And the piece of shite prosecutors used it against him. That honestly damn near brought me to tears.
I obviously hope Steven Avery gets another shot at redemption, but Dassey needs to be given some hope right now. His conviction is just sickening. His stupidity was taken advantage of and they put him in jail because of it. To me, that is the most troubling part of the whole documentary.
Posted on 1/7/16 at 12:36 am to LesGeaux45
Mostly everything has been covered. But a couple of things.
1. The post conviction lawyer girl is really cute. I like how serious she is. Would marry.
2. It's tough for me to fathom how Steven keeps finding girls that will date him when TD's very own Walt keeps striking out.
1. The post conviction lawyer girl is really cute. I like how serious she is. Would marry.
2. It's tough for me to fathom how Steven keeps finding girls that will date him when TD's very own Walt keeps striking out.
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:11 am to SwaggerCopter
My new theory.
Bobby Dassey or Scott Tadych accidentally shot her on the property trying to test out their guns before hunting. ..
Not a theory actually, much less, just a random idea to throw out there.
Bobby Dassey or Scott Tadych accidentally shot her on the property trying to test out their guns before hunting. ..
Not a theory actually, much less, just a random idea to throw out there.
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:31 am to Bluefin
quote:
As terrible as this documentary made me feel for Steven Avery, I finished the final episode feeling the worst for Brendan Dassey.
Absolutely this.
I can't say for sure Steven didn't kill the woman. I'm confident it's not like how they say in the garage. Not a drop of blood found?.....c'mon
I'm confident the poor kid had NOTHING to do with it. He got convicted of shite thrown out of the other case due to a lack of evidence. His own cousin admitted to making shite up and the prosecutor referenced her anyway in his closing. His first lawyer was laughable.....I just can't believe Brendan is sitting in jail still.....
Posted on 1/7/16 at 1:46 am to tiggerthetooth
Just finished the series, and I don't know if Steven Avery killed Teresa or not. As a juror, though, I would have voted not guilty because I'm not convinced he did.
These latest protestations by DA Kratz that the film makers left out key bits of evidence against Avery are absurd, to say the least. Every last one of these "left out" bits can be easily explained away... I didn't need Mr. Strang to do that for me.
But here's what I find missing from this very long thread: It really should not have mattered whether or not Steven committed the crime... given the participation by the Manitowoc Police Department and the fact that most of the damning evidence came by their hands Steven SHOULD NEVER HAVE GONE TO TRIAL in the first place, guilty in fact or not.
Obviously, that would not have served the Halbach family very well, but we as a society simply should not abide deliberate misconduct within the law enforcement and justice processes. Conflict of interest is, itself, misconduct, which makes planting of evidence all too attractive. If Avery had to walk without a trial to make that point then that's a lesson the police should learn and then have to explain away to the victim's families.
These latest protestations by DA Kratz that the film makers left out key bits of evidence against Avery are absurd, to say the least. Every last one of these "left out" bits can be easily explained away... I didn't need Mr. Strang to do that for me.
But here's what I find missing from this very long thread: It really should not have mattered whether or not Steven committed the crime... given the participation by the Manitowoc Police Department and the fact that most of the damning evidence came by their hands Steven SHOULD NEVER HAVE GONE TO TRIAL in the first place, guilty in fact or not.
Obviously, that would not have served the Halbach family very well, but we as a society simply should not abide deliberate misconduct within the law enforcement and justice processes. Conflict of interest is, itself, misconduct, which makes planting of evidence all too attractive. If Avery had to walk without a trial to make that point then that's a lesson the police should learn and then have to explain away to the victim's families.
Popular
Back to top



1










