Started By
Message

re: Just watched “2001 A Space Odyssey” for the first time. I didn’t get it

Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:28 am to
Posted by Don Quixote
Member since May 2023
4106 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Can you imagine seeing this in the theater when it first came out April 2, 1968?


I did see it in theaters when it first came out.

6 yr old me was in awe of the special effects but aside from that I had no idea what the movie was about.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
37869 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 10:45 am to
quote:

Can you imagine seeing this in the theater when it first came out April 2, 1968?
quote:

I did see it in theaters when it first came out.

6 yr old me was in awe of the special effects but aside from that I had no idea what the movie was about.
I was 7. I remember our parents trying to make sense of it by attaching religious allegory. Mostly it was seen (by the adults around me) as aliens advancing mankind past what we could comprehend, and the danger of our rapid advancement into technology (AI). The imagery and special effects more than made up for any lack of comprehension.

2001 may have helped Planet of the Apes, in that the films were released within weeks of each other and PotA was a way more accessible sci-fi film. When we saw PotA in the theater, I looked at my big brother at the end and he said, "They were on Earth the whole time." and 1st Grade me totally understood what they were trying to do with the movie.
Posted by Buck_Rogers
Member since Jul 2013
2066 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:18 am to
Man invents tool.
Tool becomes man and man becomes tool.
Man tries to get rid of tool.
Tool kills man and becomes man again.
Man evolves into starbaby.
This post was edited on 8/24/23 at 11:20 am
Posted by abellsujr
Member since Apr 2014
37975 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:26 am to
Stanley Kubrick predicted the future.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
37869 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Stanley Kubrick predicted the future.
Arthur C. Clarke predicted smartphones, email, video calls, home computers, search engines, etc. Video: Arthur C. Clarke 1976 Interview
The Clarke Belt is the band of satellites in geostationary orbit that Clarke predicted would someday replace the towers and cable systems of his day.
Posted by TejasHorn
High Plains Driftin'
Member since Mar 2007
11587 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 11:52 am to
I saw 2001 in a theater on one of those “throwback” nights.

I’d seen it before but it was different on the big screen. The timing, imagery and score, it’s a masterpiece on those merits alone and must’ve been a mind bender in the 60s.
Posted by MasterKnight
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2016
2311 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 2:29 pm to
HAL was the only one knowing the true mission. As it is in his programming to update the crew, he could not tell them the true mission. He did not know how to lie. He suffered a breakdown and when David and other guy was going to basically shut him down, he killed the crew. He was programmed to be able to complete the mission on his own if necessary.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94713 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

He was programmed to be able to complete the mission on his own if necessary.


He had the AI equivalent of a psychotic break. He came to the conclusion that he could not complete all the elements of the mission he was assigned:

1. Keep certain details from the crew

2. Keep the crew safe

3. Complete the mission as necessary

So, insofar as 1 and 2 were incompatible, he decided to eliminate the crew and just do 3, being obviously the main priority of those sending him on the mission (basically, if all else fails, they're good with it as long as the mission is successful).

He just didn't count on Dave.




*SPOILERS*

I really dug the way 2010 allowed the character to be rehabilitated and the opportunity to atone by heroism.

Posted by theantiquetiger
Paid Premium Member Plus
Member since Feb 2005
20041 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

Monolith helps humans evolve

First one gave apes weapons


I get this

quote:

Second one made us go full bore on solar system exploration


This makes a little more since now. I was thinking the moon scene and HAL scene were during the time period. The moon scene seemed more advanced than the HAL scene. The scene had a Hilton hotel and restaurants in space, plus space transports like an airline.

I was thinking the monolith helped mankind build AI (HAL), which became smarter than mankind.

The last scene, after the five minute drug induced, multicolor sequence, just completely went over my head. The moons of Jupiter were aligned up while the monolith flew by.

I was thinking the creation of the starbaby was due to mankind killing AI, causing mankind to go back to the start of man (a baby)
This post was edited on 8/24/23 at 2:39 pm
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
46393 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

I was thinking the creation of the starbaby was due to mankind killing AI, causing mankind to go back to the start of man (a baby)
the star baby is bowman. the sequence after the space ride is bowman aging/evolving under influence of the advanced beings that created the monoliths
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
9876 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 4:09 pm to
It's how we got the moon landing.
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George, LA
Member since Aug 2004
80424 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 4:43 pm to
I saw it for the first time a few years ago, and I will get downvoted to hell, but I thought that movie was just awful
Posted by ScottFowler
NE Ohio
Member since Sep 2012
4596 posts
Posted on 8/24/23 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

I really dug the way 2010 allowed the character to be rehabilitated and the opportunity to atone by heroism.


All of this.

2010 is a very good movie with a great cast.
A forgotten gem.
Posted by A12 Oxcart
On the float out in the Belt
Member since Dec 2022
1015 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 8:52 am to
The movie gets some critical leeway because of who directed it, just like The Shining.

If those movies had been directed by lesser knowns, they would have been panned more heavily.
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
11140 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 1:45 pm to
Let me add a bit more about 'space travel'.

I worked in Chicago the summer of 68 in a building next to the Wrigley building. That was the summer that we put men on the moon for the first time, people shared TV sets and at noon we all went down to Michigan Avenue to watch TVs in the store windows. And the next week we went down to the street to watch the parade with the astronauts back from the moon. They rode sitting up on the head rests of the back seat of a convertible.

The moon was really big news.

That same summer I saw 2001 at a downtown inside the loop theater on a hot Saturday afternoon. Excellent acoustics and comfortable seats and anything seemed possible after the moon landing.

I remember how ominous Hal felt, in large part because of the stereo sound that filled the theater.
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
9013 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

2010 is a very good movie with a great cast.
A forgotten gem.


I saw 2010 first in the theater as child and in some ways still prefer it to this day to 2001.
Posted by Boodis Man
Member since Sep 2020
7100 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 7:06 pm to
Interstellar feels like a spiritual successor to 2001. You can tell Nolan was inspired by the film and wanted to pay homage
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
22305 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 7:11 pm to
Book series made based on the Kubrick Movie>>>> the movies

This post was edited on 8/25/23 at 7:12 pm
Posted by BRich
Old Metairie
Member since Aug 2017
2739 posts
Posted on 8/25/23 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

I worked in Chicago the summer of 68 in a building next to the Wrigley building. That was the summer that we put men on the moon for the first time, people shared TV sets and at noon we all went down to Michigan Avenue to watch TVs in the store windows. And the next week we went down to the street to watch the parade with the astronauts back from the moon. They rode sitting up on the head rests of the back seat of a convertible.


Your memory is off or you had a typo. Apollo 11 landed on the moon in 1969, not 1968.

And 2001 came out the year before the moon landing, in 1968.
Posted by Purplehaze
spring, tx
Member since Dec 2003
2306 posts
Posted on 8/27/23 at 12:06 am to
I was a freshman at USL in Lafayette in 1968.

You need to understand where we were as a society in 1968 when it came to using computers. USL had just started using computer cards for class registration. You stood in line to get a newspaper showing course classes, time and day schedules. You picked your top 3 choice for each class then handed them in. You stood in line the next day to get your cars back to see if you got your choice. LSU still required students to go to either the Ag center of the Old men's gym on top of victory hill and go stand in line at various stations to get their class schedules filled out. But at LSU, if you followed the football players, you had a shot at getting in a class with easy teachers.

Planet of the Apes was warning us of the dangers of nucleur war. Simple as that.

2001 was warning us about the danger of computers taking over.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram