- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Christopher Nolan and amateur film critics
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:54 am to Cockopotamus
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:54 am to Cockopotamus
quote:
Also Nolan has the same issue Judd Apatow had. Even his “great” movies are 30 minutes too long. Except maybe the Prestige
You’re confusing Nolan with Scorsese.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:07 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
When was the last time Spielberg made a truly fantastic movie? The same question can be asked of Scorsese.
2023. It's not a very interesting answer for Scorsese.
1993 for Spielberg, but there's been plenty of very good and great since then. And I think he's on a streak of 3 quality movies in a row, though i know that is not a consensus opinion.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:41 pm to MemphisGuy
I know Nolan has hurt some of your feelings here because all y’all want to talk about is Spielberg and Scorsese.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 1:11 pm to sorantable
Is he forgetting he made Tenet? That movie was shite. He isn't batting 1.000.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 1:21 pm to Shiftyplus1
quote:
He isn't batting 1.000.
Film is very subjective and I doubt very much he is batting 1.000 with a lot of movie goers for that very reason. However - and I know this isn't a popular metric - he is batting 1.000 with the critics. Of the films he has made:
Following (1998): 87% on Rotten Tomatoes
Memento (2000): 94% on Rotten Tomatoes
Insomnia (2002): 92% on Rotten Tomatoes
Batman Begins (2005): 85% on Rotten Tomatoes
The Prestige (2006): 77% on Rotten Tomatoes
The Dark Knight (2008): 94% on Rotten Tomatoes
Inception (2010): 86% on Rotten Tomatoes
The Dark Knight Rises (2012): 87% on Rotten Tomatoes
Interstellar (2014): 73% on Rotten Tomatoes
Dunkirk (2017): 92% on Rotten Tomatoes
Tenet (2020): 70% on Rotten Tomatoes
Oppenheimer (2023): 93% on Rotten Tomatoes
The Odyssey (2026): 94% on Rotten Tomatoes
Not a single "rotten" film on this list. That's a pretty decent critical track record and the audience scores for all of those films are pretty high as well - though Tenet admittedly as his lowest audience score (76%).
This post was edited on 8/3/26 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 8/3/26 at 1:58 pm to sorantable
quote:
Just a very insightful take
Eh, he's aiming at low hanging fruit
quote:
best filmmaker alive
No.
quote:
why your favorite YouTube outrage merchants are clowns.
They have to manufacture outrage to keep views powering in.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 2:27 pm to iwyLSUiwy
quote:
Oppenheimer won best picture
So did Crash.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 2:45 pm to Philzilla2k
quote:
So did Crash.
Yea not even remotely in the same ballpark. Oppenheimer was not for everyone and that's fine but it's a good movie. Certainly not one that could be written off as a "miss" for Nolan. Crash was just straight up bad.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 2:52 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
The Prestige (2006): 77% on Rotten Tomatoes
The Dark Knight Rises (2012): 87% on Rotten Tomatoes
Interstellar (2014): 73% on Rotten Tomatoes

Posted on 8/3/26 at 4:52 pm to sorantable
Nobody is saying thata trope "automatically ruins a movie". A lot of great films use familiar storytelling tools all the freaking time. The problem is when a filmmaker relies on a predictable mechanism and the audience notices the strings holding it up.... Understanding why something works doesn't invalidate it, sometimes that's exactly why it fails. A magician can still amaze you even though you know the trick but if you see the strings you're allowed to criticize the illusion.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 5:17 pm to Philzilla2k
quote:
So did Crash.
So did Schindler's List and Lawrence of Arabia.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 6:56 pm to iwyLSUiwy
Tarantino may be the most overrated director in the history of the art form.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 9:25 pm to BeepBopBoop
quote:
This is getting as bad as music critics and Radiohead.
TOOL is another.
Outside of "46 and 2", I haven't cared for them much.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:33 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
he is batting 1.000 with the critics.
There are very few critics, anymore. Just paid shills.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:43 pm to finchmeister08
quote:
TOOL is another.
Are high-schoolers just discovering weed considered critics?
Mainstream music critics have been notoriously hard on Tool, despite their massive popularity. A good reminder that sometimes the masses like garbage music.
Posted on 8/4/26 at 12:06 am to RollTide1987
Using rotten tomatoes as the objective measure of a film's critical success is laughable
Villeneuve, PTA, Cuarón, Tarrantino, Bong Joon Ho and Chazelle all > Nolan. Fincher would as well if he didn't forget how to direct post-Gone Girl
Villeneuve, PTA, Cuarón, Tarrantino, Bong Joon Ho and Chazelle all > Nolan. Fincher would as well if he didn't forget how to direct post-Gone Girl
Popular
Back to top

0


.png)











