Started By
Message

re: Adam Driver: Kylo Ren Was Originally Supposed to Be Committed to the Dark Side by the End

Posted on 12/14/23 at 1:27 pm to
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
87411 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

I don’t get why point you’re trying to make. Explain to me please

That you have access to irony. It's cute.
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34286 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Adam Driver revealed on “The Rich Eisen Show” that his arc as Kylo Ren in “Star Wars” completed changed from its original plan over the course of his three films:

“J.J. Abrams walked me through what he wanted to do with the character,

Rian Johnson took Kylo Ren’s original arc in “a different direction” with “The Last Jedi,” although “it still tracked with the character.” That wasn’t the case with “The Rise of Skywalker.

Driver made all this up

There was no arc for VIII and IX, because the scripts hadnt even been written when Adam read in for the part of Kylo. All the arc he got was the script for VII, which was simply a New Hope redux. Then he claims Rian changed Kylos arc, but it only really happened with Abrams in IX
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
81378 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Still wouldn't have saved the sequel trilogy from the TLJ abomination.



The Rise of Skywalker could've tried to redeem it with a coherent story, instead it was an even stupider and senseless story than the Last Jedi.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
81378 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

There was no arc for VIII and IX, because the scripts hadnt even been written


Just because the scripts hadn't been written, doesn't mean there wasn't a character arch planned for everyone.

For better or for worse, they should've brought on directors for the last two movies that agreed to work with Abrams' plan for the whole trilogy, not bring in someone who just threw everything away for the second movie.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
47223 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 6:48 pm to
As much as I never bought into the arc that Anakin took, Ben Solo’s journey was even less convincing.

Of course, we never did see young Ben, before Luke tried to delete him. Are we supposed to simply assume that because he came from a broken home after daddy Han left that he was in a similarly emotional state as Anakin was?

That’s why the sequels will always be trash. They rely on telling, never showing what took place.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
81378 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

They rely on telling, never showing what took place.




I mean, that was the case for the OT for 20 years until the prequels came out.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
23553 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

I refuse to believe they had any sort of over-arching plan at all.

I agree. If they did, there would have been stipulations in place to stick to it.

To this day, a part of me believes Rian Johnson fricked TLJ up so bad as a matter of principle.

Disney spent multi billions to obtain the franchise, decided to spend over a billion total to make a trilogy, and they had zero idea or direction where they were going with it. When they gave him the 2nd film to make, it seems literally no guidelines were in place. No mandated character development, no finale to progress towards, nothing.

You just don't do that when the stakes are that high, and I think he fricked them but good to prove that point.
He killed off the big villain, Snoke
He deconstructed the franchise hero, Luke- and then killed him off
He made a joke of one of the new heroes, Poe
He completely deemphasized the other, Finn
He killed the secondary villain (the chrome stormtrooper chick)
He erased the concept of the Force as Good and Evil, as Rey increasingly turned to the Dark Side (the cave, then her attraction to Kylo).
He mocked the First Order/Resistance conflict, with Del Toro's character pointing out both sides were buying from the same arms dealers.
He inserted a profoundly annoying and frumpy character (Rose) into the story for no benefit, and actually a detriment to the plot at points.

There was so much wrong, I don't think it was an accident. I think he intentionally tanked the trilogy, because they were stupid enough to let someone do that.

Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
81378 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

He mocked the First Order/Resistance conflict, with Del Toro's character pointing out both sides were buying from the same arms dealers.


As stupid as the whole casino planet scene was, I actually liked this part. A good parallel to real world shite.
Posted by TIGERSTORM
parts unknown
Member since Feb 2009
4835 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:25 pm to
Fwiw I don't think any of the new trilogy is particularly good but I don't have the hatred for TLJ as most here do. I think ROS does the biggest disservice to the trilogy. "Hey guys Palpatine is back somehow" (announced in Fortnite ofall places). I think darkside Kylo Ren still plays in ROS and doesn't need Palpatine just make him the ultimate bad guy after they kill Snoke.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
81378 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:30 pm to
From just a pure movie standpoint, there is nothing redeeming about Rise of Skywalker. It is the worst piece of Star Wars property ever made. The story is non-sensical and it was shot so basic.

The Last Jedi at least was shot beautifully and the story was coherent enough to where it would've been fine if it was a standalone feature, not a giant middle finger to everything that happened in the movie that came before it.

The issue with The Last Jedi for me is that it went so far off the reservation from the Force Awakens that when Disney begged JJ to come back for ROS, he was just like "frick it" I'm going to just throw shite on a wall and see what happens.
This post was edited on 12/14/23 at 7:32 pm
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
15977 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

Still wouldn't have saved the sequel trilogy from the TLJ abomination.


It’s pretty clear in this instance TLJ wouldn’t work
Posted by CP3forMVP
Member since Nov 2010
15977 posts
Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

From just a pure movie standpoint, there is nothing redeeming about Rise of Skywalker. It is the worst piece of Star Wars property ever made. The story is non-sensical and it was shot so basic. The Last Jedi at least was shot beautifully and the story was coherent enough to where it would've been fine if it was a standalone feature, not a giant middle finger to everything that happened in the movie that came before it. The issue with The Last Jedi for me is that it went so far off the reservation from the Force Awakens that when Disney begged JJ to come back for ROS, he was just like "frick it" I'm going to just throw shite on a wall and see what happens.


TLJ isn’t a good movie, but it’s considerably better than ROS
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 12/15/23 at 5:34 am to
quote:

I actively avoid all Star Wars media

So you actively avoided the best star wars content ever made, andor and the mandolorian?
Posted by CornDogCologne
Mental Defective
Member since Nov 2007
8916 posts
Posted on 12/15/23 at 9:18 am to
quote:

So you actively avoided the best star wars content ever made, andor and the mandolorian?


I suppose I did. What a tragedy.
Posted by Sam Quint
Member since Sep 2022
8907 posts
Posted on 12/15/23 at 9:34 am to
quote:

TLJ isn’t a good movie, but it’s considerably better than ROS

that this is a true statement is an utter tragedy.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89826 posts
Posted on 12/15/23 at 9:44 am to
quote:

* it’s an old fan theory, but who doesn’t buy into the idea that Palpatine had a hand in what happened to Anakin’s mother. Just the sort of thing that would tip a young impressionable Jedi into turning to the dark side.


And then not knowing Luke is literally where Shmi lived all this time?





Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George, LA
Member since Aug 2004
80695 posts
Posted on 12/15/23 at 9:52 am to
The fact is they had no cohesive story from the beginning. Not one frame should have been shot until they had all three movies completely written and a director signed on to direct all three.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
20908 posts
Posted on 12/15/23 at 10:43 am to
quote:

The best option was to go the route of Kylo->Ben Solo and become redeemed, while Rey succumbs to the darkside completely because if lack of guidance and training.

I'd have watched that movie.



Would have been a good and interesting take.

But the white bad guy actually being good while destroying the "force is female" heroine would have melted Twitter. And apparently those are the types we have to appease with all of our cultural entertainment.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
20908 posts
Posted on 12/15/23 at 10:46 am to
quote:



Just because the scripts hadn't been written, doesn't mean there wasn't a character arch planned for everyone.



Character is more important than story, so I imagine when preparing for the role, Driver wanted to know the arc.

It's definitely not uncommon. Alan Rickman had a private conversation with JK Rowling before filming started for Sorcerer's Stone. He needed to know Snape's arc in preparing for how he would approach the character.
Posted by Split2874
Mandeville
Member since Jul 2012
3538 posts
Posted on 12/15/23 at 11:49 am to
I thought is would have been so cool to have Kylo do his redemption story but have Rey go the Parkside. Could have set up (organically) an awesome female badguy moving forward. (But they would have messed that up as well)
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram