- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/14/23 at 4:42 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
Adam Driver revealed on “The Rich Eisen Show” that his arc as Kylo Ren in “Star Wars” completed changed from its original plan over the course of his three films:
“J.J. Abrams walked me through what he wanted to do with the character,
Rian Johnson took Kylo Ren’s original arc in “a different direction” with “The Last Jedi,” although “it still tracked with the character.” That wasn’t the case with “The Rise of Skywalker.
Driver made all this up
There was no arc for VIII and IX, because the scripts hadnt even been written when Adam read in for the part of Kylo. All the arc he got was the script for VII, which was simply a New Hope redux. Then he claims Rian changed Kylos arc, but it only really happened with Abrams in IX
Posted on 12/14/23 at 5:23 pm to bad93ex
quote:
Still wouldn't have saved the sequel trilogy from the TLJ abomination.
The Rise of Skywalker could've tried to redeem it with a coherent story, instead it was an even stupider and senseless story than the Last Jedi.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 5:26 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
There was no arc for VIII and IX, because the scripts hadnt even been written
Just because the scripts hadn't been written, doesn't mean there wasn't a character arch planned for everyone.
For better or for worse, they should've brought on directors for the last two movies that agreed to work with Abrams' plan for the whole trilogy, not bring in someone who just threw everything away for the second movie.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 6:48 pm to rebelrouser
As much as I never bought into the arc that Anakin took, Ben Solo’s journey was even less convincing.
Of course, we never did see young Ben, before Luke tried to delete him. Are we supposed to simply assume that because he came from a broken home after daddy Han left that he was in a similarly emotional state as Anakin was?
That’s why the sequels will always be trash. They rely on telling, never showing what took place.
Of course, we never did see young Ben, before Luke tried to delete him. Are we supposed to simply assume that because he came from a broken home after daddy Han left that he was in a similarly emotional state as Anakin was?
That’s why the sequels will always be trash. They rely on telling, never showing what took place.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 6:51 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
They rely on telling, never showing what took place.
I mean, that was the case for the OT for 20 years until the prequels came out.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:02 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:I agree. If they did, there would have been stipulations in place to stick to it.
I refuse to believe they had any sort of over-arching plan at all.
To this day, a part of me believes Rian Johnson fricked TLJ up so bad as a matter of principle.
Disney spent multi billions to obtain the franchise, decided to spend over a billion total to make a trilogy, and they had zero idea or direction where they were going with it. When they gave him the 2nd film to make, it seems literally no guidelines were in place. No mandated character development, no finale to progress towards, nothing.
You just don't do that when the stakes are that high, and I think he fricked them but good to prove that point.
He killed off the big villain, Snoke
He deconstructed the franchise hero, Luke- and then killed him off
He made a joke of one of the new heroes, Poe
He completely deemphasized the other, Finn
He killed the secondary villain (the chrome stormtrooper chick)
He erased the concept of the Force as Good and Evil, as Rey increasingly turned to the Dark Side (the cave, then her attraction to Kylo).
He mocked the First Order/Resistance conflict, with Del Toro's character pointing out both sides were buying from the same arms dealers.
He inserted a profoundly annoying and frumpy character (Rose) into the story for no benefit, and actually a detriment to the plot at points.
There was so much wrong, I don't think it was an accident. I think he intentionally tanked the trilogy, because they were stupid enough to let someone do that.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:13 pm to Scoob
quote:
He mocked the First Order/Resistance conflict, with Del Toro's character pointing out both sides were buying from the same arms dealers.
As stupid as the whole casino planet scene was, I actually liked this part. A good parallel to real world shite.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:25 pm to Bench McElroy
Fwiw I don't think any of the new trilogy is particularly good but I don't have the hatred for TLJ as most here do. I think ROS does the biggest disservice to the trilogy. "Hey guys Palpatine is back somehow" (announced in Fortnite ofall places). I think darkside Kylo Ren still plays in ROS and doesn't need Palpatine just make him the ultimate bad guy after they kill Snoke.
Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:30 pm to TIGERSTORM
From just a pure movie standpoint, there is nothing redeeming about Rise of Skywalker. It is the worst piece of Star Wars property ever made. The story is non-sensical and it was shot so basic.
The Last Jedi at least was shot beautifully and the story was coherent enough to where it would've been fine if it was a standalone feature, not a giant middle finger to everything that happened in the movie that came before it.
The issue with The Last Jedi for me is that it went so far off the reservation from the Force Awakens that when Disney begged JJ to come back for ROS, he was just like "frick it" I'm going to just throw shite on a wall and see what happens.
The Last Jedi at least was shot beautifully and the story was coherent enough to where it would've been fine if it was a standalone feature, not a giant middle finger to everything that happened in the movie that came before it.
The issue with The Last Jedi for me is that it went so far off the reservation from the Force Awakens that when Disney begged JJ to come back for ROS, he was just like "frick it" I'm going to just throw shite on a wall and see what happens.
This post was edited on 12/14/23 at 7:32 pm
Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:32 pm to bad93ex
quote:
Still wouldn't have saved the sequel trilogy from the TLJ abomination.
It’s pretty clear in this instance TLJ wouldn’t work
Posted on 12/14/23 at 7:33 pm to Broski
quote:
From just a pure movie standpoint, there is nothing redeeming about Rise of Skywalker. It is the worst piece of Star Wars property ever made. The story is non-sensical and it was shot so basic. The Last Jedi at least was shot beautifully and the story was coherent enough to where it would've been fine if it was a standalone feature, not a giant middle finger to everything that happened in the movie that came before it. The issue with The Last Jedi for me is that it went so far off the reservation from the Force Awakens that when Disney begged JJ to come back for ROS, he was just like "frick it" I'm going to just throw shite on a wall and see what happens.
TLJ isn’t a good movie, but it’s considerably better than ROS
Posted on 12/15/23 at 5:34 am to CornDogCologne
quote:
I actively avoid all Star Wars media
So you actively avoided the best star wars content ever made, andor and the mandolorian?
Posted on 12/15/23 at 9:18 am to Corinthians420
quote:
So you actively avoided the best star wars content ever made, andor and the mandolorian?
I suppose I did. What a tragedy.
Posted on 12/15/23 at 9:34 am to CP3forMVP
quote:
TLJ isn’t a good movie, but it’s considerably better than ROS
that this is a true statement is an utter tragedy.
Posted on 12/15/23 at 9:44 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
* it’s an old fan theory, but who doesn’t buy into the idea that Palpatine had a hand in what happened to Anakin’s mother. Just the sort of thing that would tip a young impressionable Jedi into turning to the dark side.
And then not knowing Luke is literally where Shmi lived all this time?
Posted on 12/15/23 at 9:52 am to Bench McElroy
The fact is they had no cohesive story from the beginning. Not one frame should have been shot until they had all three movies completely written and a director signed on to direct all three.
Posted on 12/15/23 at 10:43 am to RoyalAir
quote:
The best option was to go the route of Kylo->Ben Solo and become redeemed, while Rey succumbs to the darkside completely because if lack of guidance and training.
I'd have watched that movie.
Would have been a good and interesting take.
But the white bad guy actually being good while destroying the "force is female" heroine would have melted Twitter. And apparently those are the types we have to appease with all of our cultural entertainment.
Posted on 12/15/23 at 10:46 am to Broski
quote:
Just because the scripts hadn't been written, doesn't mean there wasn't a character arch planned for everyone.
Character is more important than story, so I imagine when preparing for the role, Driver wanted to know the arc.
It's definitely not uncommon. Alan Rickman had a private conversation with JK Rowling before filming started for Sorcerer's Stone. He needed to know Snape's arc in preparing for how he would approach the character.
Posted on 12/15/23 at 11:49 am to StringedInstruments
I thought is would have been so cool to have Kylo do his redemption story but have Rey go the Parkside. Could have set up (organically) an awesome female badguy moving forward. (But they would have messed that up as well)
Popular
Back to top



0







