- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "you cost your conference a lot of money" to USM coach
Posted on 12/4/11 at 11:26 am to Seto Vlatka
Posted on 12/4/11 at 11:26 am to Seto Vlatka
quote:
USM should have folded. The money is much more important than a meaningless win against a fraud. Not only did it screw the conference now, but also in the future.
Awesome.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 11:27 am to Seto Vlatka
ARE YOU STUCK ON STUPID?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 11:30 am to tiger91
I want to see how pissed he is when SoMiss doesn't go to a BCS bowl
Posted on 12/4/11 at 11:31 am to LSUbase13
quote:
Reporter should be fired imo.
If she's homely, yes.
If she has big tits, no.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 11:41 am to tiger91
Houston cost CUSA the money.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 11:56 am to OweO
I think its a very good twist to the plot of the game, legit question not to mention im sure it was a bit tongue in cheek.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:01 pm to barry
It was more of a statement than a question.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:04 pm to barry
quote:
I think its a very good twist to the plot of the game
No it wasn't. Who gets what money is irrelevant to the game that was played on the field.
quote:
legit question not to mention im sure it was a bit tongue in cheek.
The job of a reporter interviewing a coach right after the game on the sideline is not to be "cute" and "tongue in cheek". It is to ask about the game.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 12:50 pm to OweO
quote:
Are you saying female reporters can't come up with those questions on their own? Wow..
Some. But that's a whole other rant for another day.
Sideline reporters are no different than any other talking head/reporter, especially on ESPN, in that they usually end up asking what the network wants asked to generate "discussion".
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:08 pm to BluegrassBelle
Wouldn't that be illegal if it could be proven that a team threw the game to get the conference more money.
Why the frick would you ask a ridiculous question like that?
Why the frick would you ask a ridiculous question like that?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:11 pm to tiger91
Fedora should have responded by saying "yes, but MY wallet is feeling pretty good right now."
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:23 pm to LSUGrad9295
quote:
The job of a reporter interviewing a coach right after the game on the sideline is not to be "cute" and "tongue in cheek". It is to ask about the game.
Agreed. Also notice how many reporters now call a coach by their first name like they are best friends. No frigging respect for the position of a coach.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 1:27 pm to Homesick Tiger
quote:
Agreed. Also notice how many reporters now call a coach by their first name like they are best friends. No frigging respect for the position of a coach.
For all you know, the coach's ask them to call them by their first name. Second of all, they aren't involved in the program, so why would they call him coach?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 2:03 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
Second of all, they aren't involved in the program, so why would they call him coach?
Respect? Maybe that's too pc for some of you these days. I was raised to address folks with a title as so, you know, like President, Governor, Reverend, Doctor, etc. Ain't gonna kill you to show a little courtesy.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 2:06 pm to Homesick Tiger
quote:
Respect? Maybe that's too pc for some of you these days. I was raised to address folks with a title as so, you know, like President, Governor, Reverend, Doctor, etc. Ain't gonna kill you to show a little courtesy.
Popular
Back to top


0









