Started By
Message

re: This is the death rattle of the NCAA. Predict what happens going forward

Posted on 6/8/26 at 2:27 pm to
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
36375 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

it could at least, hopefully, create a system that has clearly defined rules and regulations and take upon themselves to rule with an iron fist to uphold those rules


It's not much different from today though. The NCAA has clearly defined rules and are attempting to enforce them.

Why would a two conference league be any different?
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
197717 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 2:29 pm to
The SEC and B10 will take few B12 and ACC shools with them

That is what everybody is playing for in the next 5 years or less


And the rest of us will go back to normal college football with scholarships and stipends
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
40653 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

And may not be binding anywhere in Texas depending on what happens on appeal?


Season will be over by then
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
124337 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 2:33 pm to
Right

Why would schools care about rules or regulations when they can find a hometown judge to skirt whatever they want? Because the super conference would be “serious” this time?
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71587 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 2:40 pm to
I love this quote right here. He’s essentially saying, “shite sucks but watch this,” as he aims his gun at a large propane tank.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
This post was edited on 6/8/26 at 2:41 pm
Posted by WestSideTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
5450 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

it could at least, hopefully, create a system that has clearly defined rules and regulations and take upon themselves to rule with an iron fist to uphold those rules

The NCAA’s rules on this are pretty clear. The problem is that it’s a voluntary association that depends on its membership to enforce its ruling.


So the issue isn’t so much Sorsby here. It’s Texas Tech for allowing him to play. I think the NCAA could still go after Texas Tech.

In the Chambliss ruling the judge said the NCAA couldn’t go after Ole Miss until after he has his day in court. This judge only said the NCAA couldn't prevent the player from playing. Texas Tech could.








Posted by TheTideMustRoll
Birmingham, AL
Member since Dec 2009
10807 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Are they saying that even if Sorsby killed an opposing player on the field, the NCAA has no authority to suspend him?


That depends. Is he addicted to murdering people?
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
55209 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

the ncaa was awesome when they ruled with an iron fist
not for the players
Posted by RunningJacket
Member since Dec 2008
1052 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:56 pm to
The NCAA needs to die and this ruling helps that cause.

And did someone really say the NCAA rules with an iron fist? Seriously? Teams were buying players for the past 60 years and nothing was ever done to stop it. Sure, they smacked down SMU because they weren’t part of the club but when was Ohio St, Michigan, UGA, or Bama ever slapped down? They bought player after player and the NCAA allowed it to happen and were too scared to even open investigations. The NCAA needs to die.
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
73503 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Because LSU sucks and Lane is a joke?



My baby sho is angry.
Posted by UnitedFruitCompany
Bay Area
Member since Nov 2018
4193 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 4:58 pm to
No way the sports books didn't have a hand in this. Free advertising for them. You dont think kids in high school who are running up gambling debt will see this and think, "look like I'm in the clear here"

Personally, I hope this forces the hand of the NCAA to classify football players as employees. The melts over title IX will be glorious. 83 scholarships gone. But from the men's side. No way they cut 83 from the women. So what will happen to that block? More sports? Too expensive. More money for the women? Lol. This really will be glorious
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
25882 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 5:08 pm to
The CFP could essentially come out and say they will honor the NCAAs eligibility decisions and not include any team operating outside of it.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24359 posts
Posted on 6/8/26 at 7:25 pm to
quote:


Part of the deal his lawyers made is that he sits out the first 2 games.


Ha not quite. From what I remember, it wasn't a "deal". It was the offer his lawyers gave.

The NCAA or whoever basically said you are done.

His side countered with "2 games".
Posted by Baers Foot
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns
Member since Dec 2011
3929 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Would anyone be surprised if the SEC and Big 10 just say "enough" and break off sooner rather than later?


Say enough of the bed that they made?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram