- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The NCAA could vote to allow all D-I transfers to be eligible immediately
Posted on 9/6/17 at 10:57 am to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 9/6/17 at 10:57 am to RLDSC FAN
It will frick over the midmajors big time
They will develop kids, and p5 coaches will be recruiting them to leave.
There are several reasons to allow freebie transfers, but opening them all up, is not a good move.
They will develop kids, and p5 coaches will be recruiting them to leave.
There are several reasons to allow freebie transfers, but opening them all up, is not a good move.
0
Posted on 9/6/17 at 10:57 am to RLDSC FAN
quote:bad idea.
The NCAA could vote to allow all D-I transfers to be eligible immediately
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:17 am to Jcorye1
quote:
I agree with this if their position coach, coordinator, or head coach leaves.
frick no. They sign scholarships with schools, not coaches. If they can't look around and figure out that college coaches sometimes get fired or leave for other jobs, perhaps college is not the place for them to begin with.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:20 am to Teddy Ruxpin
quote:Meh. Just don't allow the to go over, no exceptions. Coaches will then just not offer as many scholarships to save room for a potential transfer.
It would certainly create some interesting scholarship choices.
I'm curious what rules will be included regarding "tampering." I could see a coach trying to get transfers from other schools to push them over the top and sacrifice a recruiting year of scholarships to do it.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:24 am to JBeam
Great players at smaller schools that were under recruited in HS will transfer out to big programs.
This is a disaster if it happens.
This is a disaster if it happens.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:29 am to TheCaterpillar
So you make the playoffs, but have been weak at safety all year. Can you go grab the all American safety from another school? 
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:31 am to RLDSC FAN
I assume this is supposed to apply only if the athlete's current school releases him?
Because it would be utter chaos if it was just a general transfer rule.
Because it would be utter chaos if it was just a general transfer rule.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:40 am to Master of Sinanju
quote:
It would be the 50s and 60s all over again.
You mean when the following teams claimed national championships in that time period?
Kentucky
Oklahoma
Princeton
Tennessee
Georgia Tech
Illinois
Maryland
Michigan State
Notre Dame
Ohio State
UCLA
Iowa
Auburn
LSU
Ole Miss
Syracuse
Minnesota
Missouri
Washington
USC
Texas
Michigan
Alabama
Penn State
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:41 am to JBeam
quote:
What about coaches being fired in week two or jumping for a job before/after a bowl game?
If a player is dismissed from a program, if another team wants to sign him he should be able to sign with them with no penalty.
I just don't see this as a good idea in general. We're going to see freshmen transfer before they play a single game because they're not as high in the depth chart as they want to be.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:43 am to lionward2014
quote:
I'll do you one better. A student can transfer schools whenever they want, if these players are really "student-athletes" why shouldn't they be allowed to transfer at will?
They can. They can transfer and start classes right away, no different than a regular student.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:46 am to Goldrush25
quote:
I just don't see this as a good idea in general. We're going to see freshmen transfer before they play a single game because they're not as high in the depth chart as they want to be.
Like Blake Barnett transferring after 3 games last year and being granted eligibility at ASU this year.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:52 am to TU Rob
Look at the NFL draft first 3 rounds and look at all the small programs littered in there.
Those players would all be poached by big programs with promises of titles and higher draft exposure.
Those players would all be poached by big programs with promises of titles and higher draft exposure.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 11:56 am to Master of Sinanju
quote:LSU would be one (hopefully)
People complain about there only being 15 or 16 schools capable of competing for the NC, but this would halve that number. It would be the 50s and 60s all over again.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 12:02 pm to RLDSC FAN
I remember hearing about a game long time ago about like before 1915 or something,that my grandpa told me about whrre Arkansas was playing instate school ouchita Baptist that is now a d2 school. Arkansas had a really good qb and at halftime the president or somebody and hc of obu had a meetimg a md gave him a really good "scholarship" to play with obu and in the 2nd half he played for the opposite team.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 12:05 pm to JBeam
quote:coaches have to pay penalties for doing this.
t about coaches being fired in week two or jumping for a job before/after a bowl game?
Should athletes pay back their scholly value?
Posted on 9/6/17 at 12:08 pm to RLDSC FAN
This rule is only good for those who want to watch NCAA football blow away.
The same people are fans of the O'Bannon's killing NCAA video games
The same people are fans of the O'Bannon's killing NCAA video games
Posted on 9/6/17 at 12:09 pm to TU Rob
quote:outlier is outlier
Like Blake Barnett transferring after 3 games last year and being granted eligibility at ASU this year.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 1:38 pm to VinegarStrokes
quote:
You mean when the following teams claimed national championships in that time period?
"Claimed" is an important word there, although the 50s had more variety than I thought.
60s and 70s is more like it - from 1961-1979, the same six schools traded the AP title to each other, with only two other colleges winning one.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 1:45 pm to Hot Carl
You do realize that most prospects commit to universities because of the coaches (specifically position coaches). Very rarely do you come across prospects who legit "love" whatever university they are committing to. So the fact that coaches are able to jump ship freely. But prospects can't. Is rarely fricked up.
Perfect ex: is Ed Oliver at UH.
Perfect ex: is Ed Oliver at UH.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 2:29 pm to JBeam
quote:
You do realize that most prospects commit to universities because of the coaches (specifically position coaches). Very rarely do you come across prospects who legit "love" whatever university they are committing to. So the fact that coaches are able to jump ship freely. But prospects can't. Is rarely fricked up.
Perfect ex: is Ed Oliver at UH.
I surely hope he didn't think Tom Herman was going to stay at UH his entire time at the university. He was one of the hottest coaches on the market.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News