Favorite team:Georgia 
Location:Cincinnati, OH
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:36717
Registered on:8/6/2006
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

NFL player lies about how drunk he was when playing half the time ten years ago

fixed it for you
quote:

This should never be a thing. No team should have a big advantage in the semis or finals. It will happen of course sometimes but those 6 spots randomly rotate right?

i dont really disagree here at all, but unfortunately it does exist and playing close(r) to home is considered an advantage for the higher seeded teams. most teams do not have locations as close as atlanta, i understand, but we do. that is not in my control.

quote:

Also, why would rotating from 2/3 change where the semifinals were?

i honestly don't have this selection process for location down yet in year 2. it might not matter at all. i think if indiana loses, though, that it could come into play? anyone can feel free to correct that or let me know how exactly it's gonna be decided.
quote:

I think they didn't do that because that would ironically potentially give the easier path to OSU at 3 than OSU at 2

i suppose this is possible.

but it's also surprising as it creates a a UGA-Ole Miss rematch. And if you flip it, you get 2 new match ups and a potential Miami-UGA match up which would be spicy.

all that to say, i don't necessarily think they are playing the match-up projection game because what ended up occurring is the worse option for those.
quote:

Georgia lost in the regular season and Ohio state went undefeated in the regular season and only lost in the conference championship, in a thrilling game, to a team that was ranked #2
Makes sense to me tbh

that has NEVER been the discussion before. georgia and ohio state both played conference championship games. they absolutely CAN and SHOULD be evaluated and compared on all 13 games. we are ranking these elite teams on the margins, that's all we have.

does only who you lost to matter? who you beat is more important than who you lose to. that is, i guess, a subjective opinion, and both have their place in the discussion, but neither is the sole deciding factor in an entire resume.
quote:


Why exactly is it a “big deal”?

it shows what the committee values and how they are ranking teams. it shows the value (or lack thereog, or complete inconsistency) of CCGs.

people only think it's not a big deal because they think uga got a good draw, which we don't even know to be true.

uga now potentially doesnt play in atlanta in semis.

lots of reasons why and in other years it could matter way more than it does this year. i just dont really understand why the committee is being given a free pass on this situation. never before would these 2 teams have been ranked this way.

Ohio State at 2 vs. UGA at 3

Posted by rockchlkjayhku11 on 12/8/25 at 10:56 am
frick it, i want this discussed...

why does no one care about this at all? because UGA got a "good draw" in the 6/11 match up? because the ND/Miami/Bama shite is more dramatic?

this is a big deal and just makes absolutely no sense. way more evidence that the committee is just making shite up as they go. do the conference championship games matter or not? is the only thing that matters how strong your losses are?

some years the CCGs matter, some they dont? you can't move uga ahead of ohio state, because then you have to adjust bama for losing? what's the story?

uga's resume is better than ohio state's. there's really no arguing that. nobody cares cause it's uga and ohio state?

im just curious at the complete and total lack of interest in what i find to be a very intriguing talking point.

re: Playoffs UGA 3 Seed

Posted by rockchlkjayhku11 on 12/8/25 at 10:52 am to
it's just all part of the bigger picture of the rankings and how they work. it's concerning that we are ranked behind ohio state here, because there are a ton of worlds where it would matter. it also shows that literally the only thing that is being judged is how good your losses are? maybe? or maybe it doesnt show that? it shows that conference championships dont matter? or maybe that they can depending on what conference?

it just adds to the overall complete bullshite that the process is.

in the real world for this year, it could mean the difference between playing in atlanta in a semi vs. not playing in atlanta for a semi. there would be years where the 6 seed is substantially better than the 7 and 10 seeds and that could be a huge deal.

re: Playoffs UGA 3 Seed

Posted by rockchlkjayhku11 on 12/8/25 at 9:08 am to
i understand the bracket opens up pretty fine for us playing a 6 seed that just lost their coach, BUT

we/everyone should be way more upset about this. literally makes absolutely zero sense that we arent the 2 seed. i have seen almost no discussion on this, but it's shocking.
the notre dame thing is fricking ridiculous. how many teams would have the exact same record (or better) as them if given their schedule? 25? maybe more. what are we doing?
this post is amazing and the reason message boards were invented and are actually fun

frick everyone in here shutting this down and having gay fights about usernames or whatever.

i need more information STAT on this. what beer was the guy drinking who is claiming the arranged marriage? what bar were you at? any logistics on how it worked?
quote:


FSU: best win Bama

UGA: best win Marshall


Yeh, Jesus Christ how are they behind Georgia


want to preface by saying i dont care where florida state is ranked. id have them really high right now, for sure.

but you can always take it a step further, though.

in your world here that you're creating....after 1 week, how do you know that marshall isnt better than alabama? all we know is they both lost. are you saying that you're going to go by past performance and roster construction to say that alabama is a better win than marshall?
and now ohio loses in the winners bracket days after destroying this same team.

florida, louisiana, and ohio all get completely fricked by a terrible tournament
previously beat south carolina 14-0 but then lose this one 5-4 and are out. terrible format
the regions for this absolutely suck now and the tournament structures are horrible in an association where pitch count and pitcher availability is basically the entire game.

there are like 5 regions that are just absolutely dogshit with only 4 teams and then you have the southwest and southeast that are complete monsters.

the west is only 4 teams, but at least 3 of them are gonna be really good.

apparently it is done by little league participation? that would make sense as participation in LL specifically in the southeast and southwest is going to be much lower than the east coast and north east. unfortunately the part where it doesnt make sense is that those teams all suck, but like 4 of them get to go to the LLWS.

ohio is going to go through the same thing that lousiana is. they did not get a BYE and are 3-0 and into the finals. illinois can make the finals at 2-1 and only have to win once (after losing to ohio 11-1) to win the regional. so dumb.
2017 natty is worse than 2012 for uga IMO but other georgia fans will likely disagree. they are wrong and im right, though :lol:
quote:

(And that use of the same actor for 2 people... that seemed clumsy writing posing as 3 - D Chess, but whatever)

lyle is impersonating sam haig. it's not the same actor for 2 people, it's just lyle the whole time.
quote:

They haven't taken lower ranked guys and turned them into high round picks at the position. Not really much to argue about there. Other schools (LSU, Alabama) have.

why would they do this if they just recruit the better players, throw the ball to them, and have them be 1st rounders? :lol:

so fricking dumb
i wish/hope this is big cat and brandon and not dave, but im assuming that's not possible.

re: ESPYs Gillis

Posted by rockchlkjayhku11 on 7/17/25 at 8:53 am to
quote:

Who was sitting behind Shedeur?

i dont know, shedeur is not in that picture :lol:

that's lamar jackson...