- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: T or F: Babe Ruth Hit longest dinger in MLB history (575 ft)
Posted on 3/22/20 at 10:23 am to David Ricky
Posted on 3/22/20 at 10:23 am to David Ricky
The Red seat is the longest HR ever hit in Fenway, 502 feet
The guy that hit it was built like this-

Posted on 3/22/20 at 10:40 am to TigerintheNO
Galarraga off of Kevin Brown
ESPN home run tracker calculated this at 468 in 2011 after the Rockies site initially stated 579 (which was later reduced to 529) when it happened in '97. This is one of the most impressive yacks I've seen
ESPN home run tracker calculated this at 468 in 2011 after the Rockies site initially stated 579 (which was later reduced to 529) when it happened in '97. This is one of the most impressive yacks I've seen
This post was edited on 3/22/20 at 10:42 am
Posted on 3/22/20 at 10:45 am to Tunica
too bad the Rockies were on the road when he hit that
Posted on 3/22/20 at 10:47 am to TigerintheNO
No doubt. Thick, humid, sea-level air compared to Coors Field.
Posted on 3/22/20 at 10:54 am to TigerintheNO
Yeah, that Ted Williams homerun is a perfect example of a legend growing over time. Here is a news clipping from the day after that game:
“Ted’s Longest Homer Pierces Straw Hat on Head 450 Feet Away”
Back then, the distance was 450 feet. As the legend grew, it’s now 502 feet.
Even still, 450 feet is a long homer. But here is another fact... ballparks today have much more seating and huge scoreboards and are surrounded by huge buildings. Back then, there was much less seating and much less around the ballparks obstructing the wind. It was common for there to be wind blowing out towards the fence back then due to less obstruction.
In fact, the wind when Ted Williams hit that homer was blowing out at 24 mph.
It even mentions the high wind in the article:
“But yesterday’s drive, borne on a high wind...”
“Ted’s Longest Homer Pierces Straw Hat on Head 450 Feet Away”
Back then, the distance was 450 feet. As the legend grew, it’s now 502 feet.
Even still, 450 feet is a long homer. But here is another fact... ballparks today have much more seating and huge scoreboards and are surrounded by huge buildings. Back then, there was much less seating and much less around the ballparks obstructing the wind. It was common for there to be wind blowing out towards the fence back then due to less obstruction.
In fact, the wind when Ted Williams hit that homer was blowing out at 24 mph.
It even mentions the high wind in the article:
“But yesterday’s drive, borne on a high wind...”
Posted on 3/22/20 at 11:01 am to Tunica
quote:
ESPN home run tracker calculated this at 468 in 2011 after the Rockies site initially stated 579 (which was later reduced to 529) when it happened in '97.
So even in 1997 there was a 110 foot discrepancy?
Posted on 3/22/20 at 11:03 am to PrimeTime Money
quote:
A ball can be hit a long way, but it very rarely is," he says. "It is very rare to have a perfect storm of simultaneously hit very hard with wind blowing out at the optimum angle." Historically, Mickey Mantle's 1953 home run at Washington, D.C.'s Griffith Stadium is considered the longest ever, at 565 feet. Nathan has investigated that tater and believes the real number is closer to 540 feet. How could that have happened? A 20-mph outgoing wind. "That made a big difference," he says. "Without the wind, it would not have been over 500 feet."
From Popular Mechanics link a few pages back
Posted on 3/22/20 at 1:09 pm to Nobelium
quote:
Unless every single sports writer was just blatantly lying, Ruth did hit 460-490+ foot homeruns with regularity. I don't really see how that's disputable.
This is one time I believe the Sports Writers...not like they are current CNN so-called reporters!
Posted on 3/22/20 at 1:11 pm to 3morereps
Joey Belle mashed a few that haven’t landed yet
This post was edited on 3/22/20 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 3/22/20 at 2:05 pm to Nobelium
quote:I like how you conveniently left out that it was 295 to right and 281 to left.
Ruth wasn't just popping it over a 200 ft fence 50 times a year. Yankee Stadium in the 20s was 460 to left center, 490 to center, and 430 to right center
And it was only like that for 4 years, from 1923 to 1927.
quote:People have no idea how to judge distance. They often, unintentionally, exaggerate.
Unless every single sports writer was just blatantly lying, Ruth did hit 460-490+ foot homeruns with regularity. I don't really see how that's disputable.
Posted on 3/22/20 at 2:44 pm to PrimeTime Money
.
This post was edited on 4/23/21 at 10:33 pm
Posted on 3/22/20 at 3:37 pm to Nobelium
Yep.
Not sure why someone thinks swinging a baseball bat is akin to sprint or swim times.
Would also add this is about a few players not the entire league.
In a few more decades, some fans will question if Nolan Ryan was real.
Not sure why someone thinks swinging a baseball bat is akin to sprint or swim times.
Would also add this is about a few players not the entire league.
In a few more decades, some fans will question if Nolan Ryan was real.
Posted on 3/22/20 at 4:02 pm to AlwysATgr
Nobody is doubting that babe ruth could hit a baseball 505 feet. People are doubting that he hit it 575 when literally no one in the era of statcast has come within 70 feet of that
Posted on 3/22/20 at 4:03 pm to Nobelium
I agree about bat speed and technique but Straw and Reggie Jackson were not small wimpy men. Straw was lanky but had some muscle and Reggie was strong.
This post was edited on 3/22/20 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 3/22/20 at 4:06 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
Nobody is doubting that babe ruth could hit a baseball 505 feet.
I guess he could, but it is a little to believe after seeing him and his batting practice swings. A slow clumsy swing that just doesn’t look possible. And I’m not sure if the balls were the same back then. But he was the best so what do I know.
Posted on 3/22/20 at 4:25 pm to Nobelium
quote:Yeah, no shite... and muscle mass makes great natural hitters some of the best of all time. Muscle gives them MORE hip and bat speed. Why do you think players were hitting more bombs than ever during the steroid era? It turned good hitters into great hitters and great hitters into all-time record-setting hitters.
Hitting is definitely not based on pure strength. It's based on mechanics and hip and wrist speed. Darryl Strawberry and Griffey Jr hit the ball just as hard and far as any of the bulked up roid monsters because they had unbelievable bat speed. Reggie Jackson's 1971 All Star game home run off the roof of Tiger Stadium was hit every bit as hard as any of Bonds or Sosa's homeruns.
By the way, you’re acting like Reggie Jackson, Daryl Strawberry, and Ken Griffey Jr were small. They were huge.
Ken Griffey Jr, 6’2” 230 lbs
Reggie Jackson, 6’0” 215 lbs
Darryl Strawberry, 6’6”, 215 lbs

Posted on 3/22/20 at 5:07 pm to PrimeTime Money
Ehhhh there’s a reason those swimming and track records are so distorted. And it’s not bc today’s athlete is better. It’s actually bc of the advancements in how those things are measured now or how the events are set up period.
The tracks are made of different materials. The starting block has been innovated throughout the years. Etc etc
Same for swimming. Body suits. No wave pools. Etc etc
This is a great video that helps explain some of this
LINK
The tracks are made of different materials. The starting block has been innovated throughout the years. Etc etc
Same for swimming. Body suits. No wave pools. Etc etc
This is a great video that helps explain some of this
LINK
Posted on 3/22/20 at 5:14 pm to PrimeTime Money
In general, I agree. Better training, strength, flexibility would make a hitter a better hitter. But that doesn't necessarily preclude someone from a different era of baseball from hitting a baseball a long way.
A better comparison would be golf. Tiger was the epitome of a golfer who trained. He was also 6-3. His swing mechanics were perfect in his prime.
OTOH, John Daly was overweight, smoked on the course, and drank profusely. But their driving distances were comparable.
So I don't categorically rule out that a Ruth or a Mantle hit a baseball a long, long way.
What makes me question Ruth, is his swing mechanics. They were unorthodox as compared to Dunn, Judge, McGwire, etc.
A better comparison would be golf. Tiger was the epitome of a golfer who trained. He was also 6-3. His swing mechanics were perfect in his prime.
OTOH, John Daly was overweight, smoked on the course, and drank profusely. But their driving distances were comparable.
So I don't categorically rule out that a Ruth or a Mantle hit a baseball a long, long way.
What makes me question Ruth, is his swing mechanics. They were unorthodox as compared to Dunn, Judge, McGwire, etc.
This post was edited on 3/22/20 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 3/22/20 at 5:16 pm to Finkle is Einhorn
quote:
Ehhhh there’s a reason those swimming and track records are so distorted. And it’s not bc today’s athlete is better. It’s actually bc of the advancements in how those things are measured now or how the events are set up period.
The tracks are made of different materials. The starting block has been innovated throughout the years. Etc etc Same for swimming. Body suits. No wave pools. Etc etc
In 1936, the high jump record was 6 feet 9 inches, the current record set in 1993 is 8 feet 1/2 inches.
The shot put world record in 1932 was 16.05 meters. The current record, set in 1990, is 23.12 meters.
Look, better materials in track and swimming may account for the differences (sometimes) between current records and records set in the 90’s.
But technology advancements in the track material or the suits are not the reason why there is such large differences in records set during Babe Ruth’s era and today.
This post was edited on 3/22/20 at 5:18 pm
Posted on 3/22/20 at 5:24 pm to PrimeTime Money
Maybe watch the video in the link?
Popular
Back to top


2




