Started By
Message

re: So, is it kinda true the SEC was cheating way more than anyone else pre NIL?

Posted on 4/7/26 at 3:16 pm to
Posted by LSUChamps03
S. Louisiana
Member since Feb 2006
3166 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 3:16 pm to
People say the same thing about coaches. But coaches crawl to BR. You can’t assume every player if given an opportunity will choose one place over another. Way too many personal variables involved.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64356 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 3:21 pm to
Alabama and Georgia cant keep 2nd and 3rd string talent if Michigan/Indiana can pay starter NIL money.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
43751 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

I knew the SEC dominance was over when Harbaugh opened a Michigan camp in South Georgia during one summer. In the old days the good ole boys would have shut that down quickly. Instead he walked away with some 4 stars.


That got shut down with a quickness. He landed one dud 5 Star and a couple of three stars:
Posted by SECCaptain
Member since Jun 2025
2176 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

LSU's Mulkey to ink $32M deal, richest in women's hoops history


quote:

Kiffin has now officially signed his new deal with LSU and according to Alexander, it’s a seven-year, $91 million contract that will pay him $13 million annually. This makes him the second-highest paid coach in college football behind only Georgia’s Kirby Smart. It’s also a significant raise compared to the $9 million he made at Ole Miss this past season.


quote:

LSU’s Jay Johnson becomes highest-paid college baseball coach


quote:

LSU to pay bonus to Lane Kiffin based on Ole Miss' CFP success


quote:

LSU’s D-D Breaux becomes highest paid gymnastics coach in SEC, second in the nation


Because LSU burns taxpayer and student's tuition money on athletics. Literally no one wants anything to do with Louisiana unless it's for money, did Katrina teach your state nothing?

I get it, LSU's enrollment would plummet without a successful athletics program as it's dependent upon morons attending simply to live vicariously through an athletics department they're not part of/doesn't give a shite about them aside from taking their money, but just how far is LSU willing to go with this?
Posted by RunningJacket
Member since Dec 2008
904 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 3:40 pm to
We all wish our teams had been cheating. As a GT guy I’ve always said we were stupid for not playing the game like others were. By the late 80’s this was no longer a gentlemen’s sport and we should have been cheating to compete instead of pissing away 20 years.

As for better coaches come on with that. Saban was at Mich St and won nothing until he aligned with the bagmen in Tuscaloosa. He played it perfectly but he isn’t some great coach. Look at Cignetti- he didn’t suddenly become a hundred times better coach but he did get a hundred times better player pool and magically won. Gene Chizik won a freaking Natty using the bagman system and no one says he’s a genius coach.

The entire sport’s history is fake because it’s never been a fair sport. I will say Saban is the GOAT of the bagman system. I will say Cignetti is the GOAT portal coach so far. I will say Kiffen is the GOAT of getting AD’s to buy him.


But this new era is wide open for any team willing to pay. Indiana will always be the new marker in college football. The ND era of the mid to 1900’s is long gone. The Bama dynasty is over. The SEC domination is over. The field is now wide open to whoever pays and coaches. I think it’s great for the sport.
Posted by LSUChamps03
S. Louisiana
Member since Feb 2006
3166 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

Because LSU burns taxpayer and student's tuition money on athletics. Literally no one wants anything to do with Louisiana unless it's for money, did Katrina teach your state nothing? I get it, LSU's enrollment would plummet without a successful athletics program as it's dependent upon morons attending simply to live vicariously through an athletics department they're not part of/doesn't give a shite about them aside from taking their money, but just how far is LSU willing to go with this?


There is so much wrong with this post I don’t know where to begin.

LSU does not support athletics with taxpayer dollars any more than any other university. LSU football revenue covers all athletics.

And what do you know about no one wanting anything to do with LA unless it involves $? There are plenty of us who live in, live well and have success and happiness in Louisiana.

You have no clue about the motivations others have for attending LSU. It has excellent law, medical, engineering, veterinary programs and is a well-regarded research institution. So maybe it’s not top-10 nationally. Only clowns and those with an axe to grind come to conclusions like yours.

And what’s your point about coaching salaries? It’s true everywhere. It’s called competing for top talent. Coaches aren’t sitting in the AD’s office telling Verge, “Louisiana sucks, so I’m demanding a premium.”

But tell yourself what you need to satisfy your apparent superiority complex.

Posted by TheTideMustRoll
Birmingham, AL
Member since Dec 2009
10699 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

You SEC guys who say things like “everyone was paying” and the bagman was is just us “coping” have no clue what you are talking about.

If everyone was paying then schools like Vandy, Arkansas, UNC, GT, Miss St wouldn’t have sucked for years because they would have bought better players. A very few teams were clearly and provably paying - and it worked.


This sounds like coping from a fan of a school that has historically sucked. "We just didn't have the money to keep up when players were being paid thousands under the table, but now that they're being paid millions the SEC can't keep up with us!"
Posted by LSUChamps03
S. Louisiana
Member since Feb 2006
3166 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

As for better coaches come on with that. Saban was at Mich St and won nothing until he aligned with the bagmen in Tuscaloosa. He played it perfectly but he isn’t some great coach. Look at Cignetti- he didn’t suddenly become a hundred times better coach but he did get a hundred times better player pool and magically won. Gene Chizik won a freaking Natty using the bagman system and no one says he’s a genius coach.


You’re skipping over some things here. Saban did turn Mich St into a good program, he won there and left an 11-2 team when he moved to LSU. Where again he turned a program into a NC in 4 seasons. It wasn’t any big surprise he won at Alabama. He was one of if not the best coach and program builder in college athletics history. To say he isn’t some great coach? Wow.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
43751 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

As for better coaches come on with that. Saban was at Mich St and won nothing until he aligned with the bagmen in Tuscaloosa.


He turned Toledo around quick, turned MSU into a 9-2 team, took LSU to a championship but sure, he was an average coach before he got to Tuscaloosa and started buying players.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
162907 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 4:22 pm to
OSU was already a monster beforehand

UM finally got over the hump with a great coach but immediately regressed when he left

Indiana we’ll have to see if they’re simply an anomaly or on the verge of becoming a yearly contender.

I also can’t say any of those rosters were full of guys that would have been on SEC rosters pre NIL.

I think the portal has just resulted in more parity, last year really felt like most of the teams in the playoffs all had serious flaws. There was no great team
Posted by HoustonTiger6955
Member since May 2024
178 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 4:34 pm to
When I was involved we and all the other SEC schools kinda had a code amongst thieves. Charger/Camero, apartment and $50k a year was pretty standard. Some got more, some got less.

Hugh Freezus went overboard and got a target put on his back.

But make no mistake, we had it much more well managed than this crap you see now.

A kid had to prove something on the field for an agent to buy them a lambo. Now every kid that’s decent wants first rounder benefits without having done anything on the field.
This post was edited on 4/7/26 at 4:36 pm
Posted by vidtiger23
Member since Feb 2012
9630 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 4:37 pm to
I think it’s hilarious that some guys are equating a 3 year good run like 20 years of pure dominance that was ran by the SEC. The two aren’t even close to the same.
Posted by GoGators1995
Member since Jan 2023
7725 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 4:37 pm to
What a silly response thread.
Posted by RunningJacket
Member since Dec 2008
904 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 4:57 pm to
The one’s coping are Bama fans who know their run is over like ND fans have finally accepted. I know exactly why my team was mid level for decades. And I know exactly why your team won. The entire world knows.

But that era is over. You guys talking about 3 years not meaning anything sound just like my ACC brethren in hoops a decade ago. Well, here we are a decade later and ACC hoops is still mid level. Just like SEC football’s dominance is over. Sure, individual teams can still win a Natty but the days of having 3 out of 4 in the Semi’s are over.

My team has 4 Natties we are proud of and we have more SEC titles than most current SEC teams. I don’t need to cope because I don’t live and die on the scoreboard. We play Tennessee this year. Sure, I want to win and talk trash and beat my chest like any other fan, but if we lose it’s not the end of the world because neither my team nor Tennessee has a legit chance at a Natty.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
20241 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 5:00 pm to
SEC + Ohio State, USC, Florida State (90s), etc. and a few others.

I think that's an important caveat.

ETA:

But us having the best players in our region was also part of it. Now those guys are getting enough SERIOUS money to leave.
This post was edited on 4/7/26 at 5:01 pm
Posted by PP7 for heisman
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2011
10371 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 11:24 pm to
quote:


No 18 year old elite athlete is picking Baton Rouge, Tuscaloosa or Athens over Miami, FL unless there's serious money involved
Yeah Miami famously didn't pay any players to go there.

LSU, Alabama, and Georgia famously didn't have great coaching staffs that developed players and put them in the league better than anywhere else in the country. Miami is literally only back where they are because they have rich boosters that have got kids to campus. They were dropping bags illegally and still shitting the bed in the 2000s/2010s. They had terrible coaches. Like Texas post Brown. Couldn't do anything, despite paying players a ton under the table. Now they can pay more.

All the big dogs have been paying players for 75 years.
Posted by offshoretrash
Farmerville, La
Member since Aug 2008
10768 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 11:26 pm to
Alabama was the worst one.
Posted by PP7 for heisman
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2011
10371 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 11:30 pm to
All of those contracts, save Kiffin, came after national championships. It's pretty standard for big time programs to bump their coaches pay when they win a title.
quote:

Because LSU burns taxpayer and student's tuition money on athletics
LSU funds athletics pretty much entirely with private money, but good try!
quote:

Literally no one wants anything to do with Louisiana unless it's for money,
Tell that to the Louisiana kids who stayed and won titles here in multiple sports, and wanted nothing to do with any other state.

It's a shame the Texas kids, with all that talent, haven't won shite in 20 years. In fact, it wasn't until they could pay kids millions, that they stayed in Texas more often than not.
quote:

did Katrina teach your state nothing?
Yeah people losing their homes and physically not being able to rebuild them means they hated the state. It's odd that there are multiple kids who were raised in Texas but list New Orleans as their home town, considering they all hate the state.
quote:

I get it, LSU's enrollment would plummet without a successful athletics program as it's dependent upon morons attending simply to live vicariously through an athletics department they're not part of/doesn't give a shite about them aside from taking their money, but just how far is LSU willing to go with this?

Again, LSU does not use any public or student money for athletics. You have no idea what you're talking about.

It's not for everyone, though. Some schools, like Texas, try the same model. They still can't win championships. Maybe they should start taking some of that tuition money and putting it towards the athletic programs, then you won't be such a whiny pussy.
Posted by PP7 for heisman
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2011
10371 posts
Posted on 4/7/26 at 11:37 pm to
quote:


OSU was already a monster beforehand

UM finally got over the hump with a great coach but immediately regressed when he left

Indiana we’ll have to see if they’re simply an anomaly or on the verge of becoming a yearly contender.
Yeah, I don't buy the whole "BIG is taking over!" talk.

As you said, two historically great programs won titles. Then Indiana brought in an excellent coach and used a tactic that won't be around much longer (old roster) and won a title.

Meanwhile, the top SEC programs of the century, save UGA, were all in reset mode. LSU, UF, and Auburn all fired their coaches. Alabama was trying to replace Saban. Kirby just couldn't find a quarterback.

The SEC, despite not winning a title this year, was the top ranked conference in basketball.

Same goes for the women's side. Best conference, despite not winning it all.

The SEC is the best baseball conference by a pretty wide margin.

The SEC is the best gymnastics conference by a pretty wide margin.

The SEC is the best softball conference by a pretty wide margin.

I know nothing about these sports from a college standpoint, but based off the rankings, the SEC also appears to be the best tennis and golf conferences.

Same goes for track and field.

The SEC fall off is greatly overstated.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
23156 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 6:07 am to
I mean you also need to look where the highest concentrations of athletes reside. They will stay closer to home unless there is a reason (NIL $) to move farther from home.

Were SEC teams were doing shady things? Yeah probably But so were the Big 10 schools. The difference now I believe that since paying players is “legal” the payments are getting MUCH higher and much more spread out among all the players.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram