Started By
Message

Oregon player called out at home due to malicious contact

Posted on 5/31/25 at 6:37 am
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
285226 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 6:37 am
Posted by arseinclarse
Member since Apr 2007
35073 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 6:40 am to
The base runner is supposed to greet the catcher with a handshake prior to sliding.
Posted by WongsPalace
Member since Apr 2025
114 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 6:44 am to
Not a college baseball rules expert but seemed like the runner could have hit the catcher much harder. Didn't seem "malicious" at all..
Also not sure how you square the no blocking the plate without the ball rule in this.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
30897 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 6:45 am to
quote:

Not a college baseball rules expert but seemed like the runner could have hit the catcher much harder. Didn't seem "malicious" at all..


We’ve all but removed contact from the game, clearly against the rules

quote:

Also not sure how you square the no blocking the plate without the ball rule in this.


Also true
Posted by TDFreak
Coast to Coast - L.A. to Chicago
Member since Dec 2009
8266 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 6:46 am to
The gross misapplication of the rules is ruining the game.

Why wasn’t the catcher called for obstruction of home plate? It looked just like that LSU-USC play at the plate in Hoover.

These umpires are idiots.
Posted by Gings5
Member since Jul 2016
9536 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 6:47 am to
Horrible call all around. So many umps lack common sense and try to insert decisions into big time games.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
104288 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 6:48 am to
I’m not sure what the runner was supposed to do there. Slide under the catcher? The catcher was pretty much blocking the plate.

And the Oregon guy pulled up a bit before he even hit the catcher. He could’ve really ran over him, but he didn’t.
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33860 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 6:52 am to
Right call, runner clearly intended to hurt the catcher instead of trying to score. No attempt at a slide, he was just focused on tackling.
Posted by Quatre Pot
Member since Jan 2015
1694 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 7:01 am to
It looks to me like they blew the call all the way around.
Rule state obstruction is when a player blocks a clear path to the plate without clear possession of the ball. Catcher clearly did not possess the ball so it should have been obstruction and all runners advance a base.

If falling to your knees and putting up your hands to protect yourself is “malicious “ then we have lost the meaning of words

What really sucks is that guy now has to miss the next game too. So 2 blown judgements results in a kid losing rare opportunities to play
Atrocious
Posted by jlovel7
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
22831 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 7:08 am to
Baseball is a pussy sport now.

Hadn’t been able to watch much this year. Was shocked to see the softball bag being used at first. Turned the tv right off when I saw that. Ridiculous.
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33860 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 7:08 am to
quote:

If falling to your knees and putting up your hands


It’s been a while since little league but that’s not how we were taught to slide.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
104735 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 7:15 am to
One of the worst calls in baseball history

Let’s forget the malicious intent for a second (which was awful on its own)

They said it wasn’t obstruction by the catcher. In what fricking world? He is in front of the plate without the ball



You have to fire whenever made that replay review immediately

Go ahead stone hog, let’s see you argue that isn’t obstruction above

If Oregon want that picture in and played under protest I don’t see how they don’t get awarded
This post was edited on 5/31/25 at 7:17 am
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33860 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 7:19 am to
I’m glad you posted that frame because it perfectly illustrates how the runner had other options besides barreling into the catcher.

The only thing “blocking” the plate is his foot, runner could have easily stepped over or around it. Or if he just slides normally he gets the obstruction call.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
104735 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 7:22 am to
There is no “getting the obstruction call”. It’s either obstruction or not

Please, tell me again it’s only his foot blocking the plate while he has ZERO possession of the ball



There is zero argument it wasn’t obstruction. Zero. None.
This post was edited on 5/31/25 at 7:23 am
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
19242 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 7:22 am to
quote:

Also not sure how you square the no blocking the plate without the ball rule in this.

Maybe it’s a MLB rule, but isn’t part of the rule that you can be in the path of the plate if the throw brings you there?

Agree with everyone else about the malicious contact ruling. The only thing I can surmise is they saw the Oregon player extend his arms after the collision and judged that as being malicious???

I might be able to understand if they made these calls live and felt the need to dig in and say they were right. But to overturn the correct call on the field?
Posted by csorre1
Member since Apr 2010
6839 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 7:23 am to
I'm not sure that I've ever seen obstruction called correctly. In this case I would call obstruction and I don't think the Oregon player did anything outside of the norm. What was he supposed to do? If he stops running he gives himself up for a tag by the pitcher. If he goes around the catcher he potentially goes out of the base path and is still out. If he slides then both of them are open to much more significant potential injury. Running over the guy who wasn't supposed to be standing there based on the rule seems like the best play.
This post was edited on 5/31/25 at 6:19 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
104735 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 7:25 am to
Posted by Ponchy Tiger
Ponchatoula
Member since Aug 2004
47715 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 7:25 am to
quote:

Not a college baseball rules expert but seemed like the runner could have hit the catcher much harder. Didn't seem "malicious" at all..


You can clearly see the runner try to pull back to lessen the force of the impact. That entire crew should be fired. Jeez I don't think SEC umps are that bad.
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
24651 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 7:25 am to
quote:

The only thing “blocking” the plate is his foot


Gtfoh
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
104735 posts
Posted on 5/31/25 at 7:26 am to
The crew made the right call. Repay was clearly rigged is my only thought
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram