Started By
Message

re: MLB Season is Probably Dead. More On PG 5

Posted on 5/20/20 at 7:38 am to
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51271 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 7:38 am to
quote:

lobbying the general public


The general public just wants to see them play. We couldn't care less about the details behind the scenes.
Posted by msudawg1200
Central Mississippi
Member since Jun 2014
9418 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 8:18 am to
quote:

Player's Union is way too strong. Needs some losses to tame that beast.
I hope it doesn't kill the sport.

It very well could this time. I'm 47 and a huge MLB fan. It is easily my second favorite sport behind college football. I live in the middle of nowhere Mississippi about 4.5 hours from Atlanta and 6.5 hours from Dallas. I'm a huge Reds fan and try to make the trip when they play at either place. My brother lives in Dallas, so I'll trek for a few other Rangers games. I've had MLB extra innings for 13 years. I buy all kinds of Reds merchandise, as does my 22 year old son, as well as some other teams stuff also. If money concerns ,not health concerns,keep them from playing this year, then I'm done. No more games, no more TV money, no more merchandise. I'm finished if they let economics blow this. This is a chance for MLB to maybe capture the young viewer. Most MLB fans are my age group and older. If they kill off that group they may kill themselves.
This post was edited on 5/20/20 at 8:21 am
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60149 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 8:20 am to
quote:

no. but after the owners met with the MLBPA in march and both sides agree to prorated salaries, why should the players accept less?


The prorated salaries are written in their contracts

The meeting in March was about giving them a lump sum up front payment for April and May
This post was edited on 5/20/20 at 8:21 am
Posted by Speedy G
Member since Aug 2013
3899 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 1:14 pm to
A lost season means way more to the players than the owners. I assume both sides realize that.

The players’ bodies are essentially depreciating assets. They can’t make up for lost time. They get less valuable as they age. The owners can/will simply replace them with younger players. Owners are losing revenue, but players are losing revenue and value (i.e. earning potential).

A given player’s net present value a year from now is likely to be significantly less than today’s NPV. That’s not the case for an MLB franchise with no expiration date.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145150 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 1:18 pm to
quote:


The prorated salaries are written in their contracts
and their meeting in march confirmed that this would be honored
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60149 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

the players agreed to play under prorated salaries. the owners then immediately started asking for more concessions.


You’re acting like the players made some concession by agreeing to playing under prorated salaries. They had no choice. It is written into their contracts. The owners made a relatively small concession in March by giving them an up front payment for the off months.

Now I agree the owners should just play by the provision in the contract and honor the prorated salaries.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145150 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 1:29 pm to
I am in no way shape or form even remotely trying to act like that was a concession. Just that there was an agreement to honor the prorated salaries. That is all. So I get why players are making an issue out of this
Posted by sta4ever
The Pit
Member since Aug 2014
15151 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 1:55 pm to
What is happening to baseball? Less and less people watch baseball every single year. MLB or MLBPA seems to always screw something up. It seems like it’s dying and it makes me really sad. Is the game too formal and old school for our society today?
Posted by cubsfan5150
Member since Nov 2007
15761 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 2:04 pm to
The CBA wasn't drawn up with the possibility of no fans in mind.
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7233 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 3:15 pm to
Oakland Athletics missed a rent payment to the Coliseum because they didn't have the money allegedly. Both sides are cutting off their nose to spite their face.

Players can't expect the league to operate losing so much money. Owners can't expect the players to agree to a salary cap.

They need to agree to some kind of revenue split with language stating that it is EXPLICITLY only temporary. Otherwise there will be a lockout.
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94493 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 3:40 pm to
It's hard to believe MLB leadership (on both sides) could be this foolish and shortsighted, but put a ton of money on the line and greed gets the better of all involved. MLB has got a chance to be the only game in town at a time when the country is starved for sports. It's an unprecedented opportunity to grow the sport, attract new eyes and market your stars. Instead they're going piss away that chance because they can't get on the same page on pay.
This post was edited on 5/20/20 at 3:55 pm
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64608 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 3:47 pm to
=
quote:

It's hard to believe MLB leadership (on both sides) could be this foolish and shortsighted but put a ton of money on the line and greed gets the better of all involved. MLB has got a chance to be the only game in town at a time when the country is starved for sports. It's an unprecedented opportunity to grow the sport, attract new eyes and market your stars. Instead they're going piss away that chance because they can't get on the same page on pay.

agree with all of this. It's very sad. Not only are they pissing away an opportunity to draw back in more fans, they may end up pissing off casual fans and dig an even deeper hole.
Posted by LaLadyinTx
Cypress, TX
Member since Nov 2018
6022 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

MLB has the strongest players union in any sport, with by far the sweetest deal, and they aren't going to give an inch even if it means not playing a season, because they will fear setting a precedent.


Maybe they should look back to see how the strike year went for them. Fans didn't exactly come back in droves. They were mostly pissed at the players and same here...fans will feel like it's the players fault there is no season.
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
15759 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 4:46 pm to
Will the ex-Astros staff have to sit out next year too?
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70246 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

They need to agree to some kind of revenue split with language stating that it is EXPLICITLY only temporary.


The temporary revenue split is the problem. It would mean the players are taking 50% of a lower amount, and when the amount skyrockets in the future they'll go back to where they were before the pandemic.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145150 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 4:48 pm to
And the MLBPA would absolutely refuse any kind of revenue split on principle since they dont want any precedent for a salary cap

Now I think this is something they are very wrong on and is something they really need to change their stance about but they arent any time soon
Posted by DallasTiger45
Member since May 2012
8428 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 4:57 pm to
Using the media to attempt to guilt trip MLB players into revenue sharing because the 2020 outlook is unfavorable is bullshite. MLB revenues have doubled over the last decade and player salaries definitely have not. Honor the agreement in good times or bad.

Now if the owners want to bargain with the players here and maybe fix minor league pay/reduce the length of team control in exchange for revenue sharing, that’s different. But just coming to the players with a one sided amendment to the CBA and portraying them as “greedy” in the media is bullshite
Posted by PEPE
Member since Jun 2018
8198 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 5:01 pm to
So they chose to make $0 this year instead of the many millions they would have made had they agreed to something, anything?

Master negotiators indeed.
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
14492 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 5:03 pm to
Big $ players like Trout and Harper seem dead set on making it as difficult as possible to salvage a season.

there is middle ground here try harder.
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
70246 posts
Posted on 5/20/20 at 5:04 pm to
Labor negotiations are an ongoing thing that are ruled mostly by precedent. They can't agree to something now that will absolutely be used against them later. And it's completely shitty on the part of the owners to expect them to do that.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram