
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is Iowa a better CFB program than Nebraska?
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:36 am to Indiangensing
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:36 am to Indiangensing
I thought NIL would resurrect the Nebraska program, because I thought that fanbase was so hungry to win again that they'd donate whatever it took to make it happen. But maybe they've just accepted who they are now.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 12:40 pm to Indiangensing
I hate to say it but Nebraska has become the Kentucky of the big10
Posted on 9/16/26 at 12:57 pm to 0
quote:
Nebraska has been arse for the last 15 ish
Try for the last 25 years or so. Ever since the arse whooping Nebraska took from Miami in the 01 national championship game, they haven’t been remotely close to that good since
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 9/16/26 at 1:34 pm to chadr07
quote:
Try for the last 25 years or so. Ever since the arse whooping Nebraska took from Miami in the 01 national championship game, they haven’t been remotely close to that good since
They were doing ok until they fired Solich and hired Bill Callahan to replace him. That set them back. Pelini got them back on track but could never get them over the hump. Then Riley are Frost were both disasters.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:32 pm to inadaze
quote:
Iowa has had Kirk Ferentz that whole time. They've had some down years, but they've also been a top 10 program at times.
Im convinced if this dude let someone like Joe Brady or a younger version of the Bears coach come in and install whatever whacky offense he wanted to in support of the talent he had access to at Iowa they would have at least lucked into one title game. Ferentz is a freaking genius at coaching defense and he just doesnt shoot himself in the foot. ive admired this program for some time just for the consistency to their approach. Even watched the game on saturday with some guys from Iowa and they called, to a T, what would happen to end that game and sure enough it did.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:35 pm to 0
Couple of things destroyed Nebraska .. partial qualifiers being eliminated and limiting walk ons.
Nebraska was big in the California partial qualifiers for skilled position and would have 100 walk ons every year. They would get a stud or two out of that every year
Nebraska was big in the California partial qualifiers for skilled position and would have 100 walk ons every year. They would get a stud or two out of that every year
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:55 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
I think you’re using the “sit in” pretty liberally here. There really isn’t much D1 talent 2.5 North, East, or West of Norman. It’s 2.5 North of DFW metro area and that’s its hotbed. As a poster responded too, OU was smart enough to stick with UT to maintain that talent pipeline.
A 250 mile radius is considered localized recruiting turf. For OU, that includes DFW, and it is essentially their back yard. DFW is a massively fertile recruiting ground. Oklahoma is a true blueblood and could recruit DFW if they were in the big ten with Nebraska and Texas were in the SEC.
DFW is full of transients. This isn’t Louisiana where LSU dominates the popularity. Texas and OU are the two most popular brands in town. Go into any sporting goods store and the stuff on the shelves will demonstrate this.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:02 pm to UnitedFruitCompany
quote:
Ferentz is a freaking genius at coaching defense
I’d say Phil Parker deserves the lion’s share of the credit for the Iowa defense over the last 10+ years.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:07 pm to boston vol
Phil Parker replaced Norm Parker, who Ferentz hired to run a base 4-3 zone that rarely blitzed. Phil took his D and fine tuned it to a well oiled machine. Ferentz puts every bit of strategic focus on the defense and has since he arrived. Very rarely do they have horses to compete nationally on offense. It’s maddening considering how they roll out top 10 Ds every fricking year playing a base zone scheme to perfection.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 8:54 pm to inadaze
quote:
Nebraska's most successful coaches this millennium have been Frank Solich and Bo Pelini. They both got fired because Tom Osborne set such a high bar for the program.
Tom Osborne might have gotten fired himself if there had been as much pressure on coaches in his era as there is today.
1. He inherited a program that was just one year removed from back-to-back titles. He didn’t build it from scratch.
2. He was 13-13 against OU, including an awful 2-11 when both were top ten. He broke 20 pts. one time against a top ten OU team.
3. He was 12-13 in bowl games, including a 7 game losing streak.
4. He was 1-1 in conference championships.
5. He won three national titles, but 1997 was split and 1994 essentially was too.
There’s a good chance the struggles against Switzer or the 7 game bowl losing streak (combined with three straight 9 win seasons) would have got him in today’s coaching world.
People would have gotten tired of beating teams like Kansas 50-0 every year and then barely scoring against Oklahoma, FSU, and Miami.
Solich and Pelini dealt with some things Osborne didn’t.
1. Osborne spent 23/25 years in the Big 8. Solich and Pelini coached entirely in the Big 12/10.
2. Both Solich and Pelini had to deal with strong OU teams every time they played. OU was rock bottom during Osborne’s glory years.
3. Top programs frequently recruiting rosters with multiple first round picks started in the early’00s. Osborne never dealt with anyone close to 2001 Miami for a national championship, as Solich did.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 9/16/26 at 8:58 pm to Indiangensing
This thread:
So much corn……
So much corn……
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:35 pm to Indiangensing
Nebraska's ceiling went from OU to Iowa overnight when they left the Big 12.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 9:56 pm to SoDakHawk
Third fold would be the abolition of Prop 48 and non qualifiers. Osborne made a living off those types. Many of those hood kids he got were limited to where they could actually go play.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:08 pm to lsufanva
quote:
Third fold would be the abolition of Prop 48 and non qualifiers. Osborne made a living off those types. Many of those hood kids he got were limited to where they could actually go play.
I will never understand why a coach with a losing bowl record, a .500 record against his archrival (losing almost all the meaningful games), and only one outright national title (playing thugs like Christian Peter and Lawrence Phillips in that one) is so revered here.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:20 pm to Globetrotter747
quote:
and only one outright national title
He has two outright titles. Whether you think PSU should have split the title in ’94 is irrelevant. Nebraska was voted, overwhelmingly, No. 1 in both the AP and Coaches Polls. They were the consensus national champions in 1994. Penn State doesn’t even claim the title.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 10:59 pm to T1gerNate
quote:
Both are strong programs with great fans. Good old American Big Ten West football the way God intended
Great background noise for a nap
Posted on 9/16/26 at 11:30 pm to Ron McKelvey
quote:
Nebraska's ceiling went from OU to Iowa overnight when they left the Big 12.
Try Iowa state. They’re nowhere near Iowa by any measure since joining the league.
They have not played in a major bowl in 25 years
They have played in just 4 bowls over the last 11 years with the Music city being their most prestigious, and that’s pre playoff expansion before it was elevated in prominence.
They just ended a streak of 7 straight losing seasons with a pair of 7-6 records.
They haven’t finished .500 or better in league play since 2016.
They haven’t had a consensus AA since they joined the league.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 11:32 pm
Posted on 9/17/26 at 12:03 am to The Third Leg
quote:
Iowa
quote:same shite
Iowa state
Posted on 9/17/26 at 12:36 am to Globetrotter747
Did you know Mount Everest only gets measured to 3 feet high by a yardstick?
Let's do this with Saban: only won 62.5% of games vs. Gus Malzahn, 50% vs. Dabo Swinney; 3-3 in CFP Championship Games; 7-6 in 2007, officially 2-6 after wins were vacated, and one of the 7 losses was to Louisiana-Monroe; only won 59% of games with Michigan State.
Of course there are the 7 National Championships, rebuilds with LSU and Alabama, the best dynasty in the history of college football, etc. But that's obviously something that gets ignored for the purposes of distorted framing.
You don't need to cherry-pick for a distorted narrative to make the point that Osborne would've faced different challenges in a different era. Swinney is going through a version of that now.
We don't know how good Osborne would've been in the 2000s. But I think it's a mistake to just presume he was too old-school for changing times. For one, we have the example of Iowa here in this thread that a lot of the old-school stuff has continued to be effective. Then you have the aspect of option football. Some people underestimate how hard that is to slow down when it gets rolling, and that led to one of Saban's most well-known media rants.
Georgia Southern rushed for 302 yards against that 2011 defense. A defense that allowed an average of 183.6 YPG for the season.
It creates a lot of issues for defenses in being sound in assignments. But it also creates potential matchup issues with those types of big defenses that were built to shut down the run between the tackles. Because the option gets them thinking and moving horizontally. If you go smaller and faster on defense, then those guys have to play the run between the tackles, and they're going to have to take on a fullback. That will take a physical toll on a defense. And we don't know how Osborne might have added to the offense playing in a different era.
Let's do this with Saban: only won 62.5% of games vs. Gus Malzahn, 50% vs. Dabo Swinney; 3-3 in CFP Championship Games; 7-6 in 2007, officially 2-6 after wins were vacated, and one of the 7 losses was to Louisiana-Monroe; only won 59% of games with Michigan State.
Of course there are the 7 National Championships, rebuilds with LSU and Alabama, the best dynasty in the history of college football, etc. But that's obviously something that gets ignored for the purposes of distorted framing.
You don't need to cherry-pick for a distorted narrative to make the point that Osborne would've faced different challenges in a different era. Swinney is going through a version of that now.
We don't know how good Osborne would've been in the 2000s. But I think it's a mistake to just presume he was too old-school for changing times. For one, we have the example of Iowa here in this thread that a lot of the old-school stuff has continued to be effective. Then you have the aspect of option football. Some people underestimate how hard that is to slow down when it gets rolling, and that led to one of Saban's most well-known media rants.
Georgia Southern rushed for 302 yards against that 2011 defense. A defense that allowed an average of 183.6 YPG for the season.
It creates a lot of issues for defenses in being sound in assignments. But it also creates potential matchup issues with those types of big defenses that were built to shut down the run between the tackles. Because the option gets them thinking and moving horizontally. If you go smaller and faster on defense, then those guys have to play the run between the tackles, and they're going to have to take on a fullback. That will take a physical toll on a defense. And we don't know how Osborne might have added to the offense playing in a different era.

Popular
Back to top



0








