Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:5189
Registered on:8/4/2010
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Year 4, a 16-52 SEC record, and currently no players from Louisiana on the roster...

re: this is so sad

Posted by inadaze on 2/21/26 at 7:04 pm to
It would be interesting to see a team with some veteran in-state guys. E.g., Pierre Jr. (SMU), Tugler (Houston), Washington (Maryland), Coleman (Oklahoma State).
Of course, there are lots of good areas for recruiting around Louisiana too, and the portal.

re: Modern collegiate uniforms

Posted by inadaze on 2/19/26 at 1:08 pm to
I didn't expect to see Miguel Tejada in a thread today. One of the best power-hitting shortstops in MLB history.

re: Calipari's Roster Construction

Posted by inadaze on 2/19/26 at 11:32 am to
Richmond is not the type of guy I'm talking about. He's a really good all-around player. I'm talking about a role player specifically for defense. You don't want Richmond burning through fouls. And while he is a good athlete at 6'6, at that size, he's going to have issues with smaller, quick guards like Philon. I'm talking about having a smaller, quick guy who's able to stop or stay with a drive. Richmond couldn't do that on those drives in the 2nd half that ignited the comeback. That penetration by Philon was almost unstoppable.

re: Calipari's Roster Construction

Posted by inadaze on 2/18/26 at 11:51 pm to
Knox may have been able to help on Philon. But what I was wondering during the game is why they don't have a specific role player that's a guard stopper.
quote:

Guards win in March

To the extent that this is true, it goes back to my idea of a guard stopper. A guy whose role is to just defend and disrupt a good guard like Philon. Arkansas has enough scoring and post defense. (That block that Brazile got on Philon that was initially called goaltending...)
This hypothetical guard stopper really just needs to be athletic, strong, quick, and generally a good defender with fouls to burn. Anything else would be a bonus, but he wouldn't need to be a scorer. Arkansas has enough scoring, and they're strong in other areas.
A role player like that would be far more beneficial to the team than Ewin. That guy fumbled every opportunity he had.

Calipari's Roster Construction

Posted by inadaze on 2/18/26 at 9:26 pm
Arkansas is really top-heavy, but the deficiencies in having a complete roster cost them the game tonight.
Ewin is a major liability, and no one could stay with Philon.

re: What is the point of a debate?

Posted by inadaze on 2/17/26 at 5:09 pm to
If it's a good argument, or debate, people learn from each other, and possibly build on each other to reach new ideas, or new solutions. But that's really rare. So it's usually about ego, trying to "win", insult or tear down the opponent, etc.
They're playing better. Bringing in two new guards, sometimes that's going to take time to gel and get a rhythm going. But they lack perimeter shooting. Klavzar shoots it well, but Fland and Lee are shooting at really low percentages from deep this season.

re: Kansas is winning it all this year

Posted by inadaze on 2/15/26 at 10:45 am to
quote:

without their best player.


Keep in mind that it took some clutch shots from him for KU to beat Texas Tech without Anderson.
Based on the rationale of the KU pick, you have to be impressed with Texas Tech, right?
October 26 is a major problem for the narrative you want to portray.
Try evaluating that one for yourself without AI...
He allowed hits that knocked Daniels and Nussmeier out of games.
They were good rushers. Dallas Turner and R Mason Thomas, but those are the types of guys NFL teams look for on the edge.
He also had issues at times against South Carolina's good rushers.
It's not really surprising to me that he is having issues in the NFL.
quote:

colours


Noah Webster would be so disappointed.

re: Illinois Basketball

Posted by inadaze on 11/12/25 at 1:10 pm to
It still doesn't work because Illinois won their Sweet 16 game in 24.
One major gauge for underachievement to me is in relation to football programs. If a university has all the pieces in place to have an elite football program, then it definitely has the potential for an elite basketball program.
Both programs have really good recruiting areas. If using that as the basis for an underachievement status, maybe there's somewhat of an argument. But Underwood obviously has an affinity for European players. The game last night showed they lack toughness and physicality inside. JT Toppin had his way too much. That should improve when they get Tomislav back, though.

re: Illinois Basketball

Posted by inadaze on 11/12/25 at 8:22 am to
quote:

College basketball has Illinois and Purdue.


How exactly are you coming to that determination?
In 2024, Illinois won the Big Ten, and lost to the UConn Champions in the Elite 8.
By any metric, Illinois has outperformed LSU over the last 5, 10, 15 years. There's no reason that should be the case based on program potential. Really, I'd say LSU is one of the most underachieving programs in all of college basketball, along with Georgia, USC, Penn State, and some others.
Purdue really does not belong with the underachieving programs. They're top 10 in winning percentage over the last 10 years, with 6 deep tournament runs (Elite 8 or better). It was again that historic UConn team that ended their run in 2024.

Illinois Basketball

Posted by inadaze on 11/11/25 at 11:03 pm
The Illini have a good team. They just beat #11 Texas Tech without Tomislav Ivisic.
They're young at some spots, but they have a good mix of big guards and frontcout players. Boswell is a strong veteran player.
And with the Ivisic brothers, Stojakovic, Mirkovic, and Petrovic, they might lead the country in Slavic surnames.

re: Lakers- What has been the biggest...

Posted by inadaze on 11/5/25 at 11:34 pm to
He is, but he has always been underrated. Way under the radar as a recruit in Arkansas, then undrafted. Even before this season, most people probably didn't think he could consistently be at the level he's played at.

re: CBB IS BACK

Posted by inadaze on 11/3/25 at 3:48 pm to
Why are you so sure as to "hammer" when you haven't seen this version of Gators?
They return the main frontcourt players from last season, and there's a redshirt freshman on the roster listed at 7'9", 305. We'll have to see how their backcourt transfers mesh. There's a lot of potential with Fland and Lee. You don't see many Asian basketball players in the SEC. And obviously he's going to be playing against better athletes in the SEC than in the Ivy League, but he's a really skilled basketball player.


I'm not able to tolerate most typical church services. If it's a party like this, I might visit, but otherwise, I find "preacher delivery" too irritating.
They obviously mimic each other to the point that they have similar speech patterns. There's this range of delivery where they hit on really similar tones and inflections. Sometimes their voice will rise and become tonally (and totally) sure of themselves when they're trying to land a point of emphasis, or get an amen.
I don't know how people are able to stand listening to it because it's overwhelmingly annoying to me.
Sometimes, yes. But I rarely ever get into arguments or conversations specifically about religion with christians anymore. I became so tired of it years ago. Their viewpoints, almost always based on geographic indoctrination, are too predictable, and it becomes nails on a chalkboard while a baby cries to me.
They're not curious people. Not too into reason. Overly certain about their stories. If step 1 of their info gathering process is to attempt to confirm their preheld bias, I'm out.
I like having a meta view of the world religions. If someone wants to talk about that in a fairly unbiased way, I may do that. But if it becomes the thing in which a christian spins narratives that put down the veracity of other religions while trying to find "reasons" that their stories are the cosmic and metaphysical truth, no, I'll pass.
quote:

Not sure why


Because it's closely associated with "body count" in the sense of murders?
I don't like it either.
I'd say no at Louisiana Tech. Maybe somewhere else if there was an opportunity to get high-level athletes on defense. A lot of what made the LSU and Alabama teams so good was having corners that were good in man, then high-level big athletes along the front who could stop the run and rush QBs.