Started By
Message

re: Is College Football better now than it was 10 years ago?

Posted on 8/3/26 at 9:29 am to
Posted by swagsurfin7
Founder of the Alex Morgan Fan Club
Member since Dec 2009
7337 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Agreed. Anyone under 35 or so wouldn't understand.


Turned 35 this year.

College football fricking sucks now.
Posted by PSS101
Member since Jun 2024
1906 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 9:51 am to
College football blows chunks compared to 10 yrs ago
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
90934 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 9:53 am to
quote:

10 years ago UGA wasn’t even relevant in the grand scheme of things.


It's almost like getting the best coach/recruiter/talent developer in our history that same year may have helped improve our national standing. Weird.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
92228 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 9:54 am to
Did you see Alabama’s 2016 defense? Heck no football is not better now
This post was edited on 8/3/26 at 11:13 am
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
16201 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:03 am to
quote:

but the expanded playoffs has taken a lot of luster off the regular season, particularly rivalry week.


I agree that it has hurt the out of conference rivals. How much did it suck if your team lost a game in October and it meant your season was over. There are now more meaningful games.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
48830 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:57 am to
quote:

I agree that it has hurt the out of conference rivals. How much did it suck if your team lost a game in October and it meant your season was over. There are now more meaningful games.


On the flip side, the 2024 Michigan/Ohio State game meant absolutely nothing. In previous eras of the sport, that game would have (rightfully) knocked OSU out of title contention.

The 2007 Pitt/WVU game was arguably one of the most consequential college football games of all time and easily the most devastating loss I have ever seen for any college football program. In a 12 team playoff era, no one would remember it happened and it would have meant nothing.
Posted by karmew32
Scott, LA (born & raised in Ponchy)
Member since Jan 2017
1863 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:20 am to
quote:

The 2007 Pitt/WVU game was arguably one of the most consequential college football games of all time and easily the most devastating loss I have ever seen for any college football program. In a 12 team playoff era, no one would remember it happened and it would have meant nothing.

It probably would've cost WVU a first-round bye so it probably would've been somewhat consequential, but obviously not the program-destroyer it turned out to be.

The 1998 Big 12 CCG and 2011 Oklahoma State-Iowa State game both stand out as games that'd be inconsequential in this current era. Both Kansas State & Oklahoma State would've been top 4 seeds in the 12-team era.
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
16201 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:31 am to
I agree that you do lose some of those earth shattering games of importance that came around some times. I think most fans would give that up for their team still having a meaningful game in November despite losing in September or October.

quote:

In previous eras of the sport, that game would have (rightfully) knocked OSU out of title contention.



While rightfully knocked out in previous eras I think this was a flaw in the previous system.
Posted by Partha
Member since Jan 2022
7876 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:34 am to
quote:

The 2007 Pitt/WVU game was arguably one of the most consequential college football games of all time and easily the most devastating loss I have ever seen for any college football program. In a 12 team playoff era, no one would remember it happened and it would have meant nothing.
Or how about the 2013 "Kick 6" Iron Bowl?

That was Bama's first loss of the season and it's a legendary finish. In the 12, heck probably in the 4 team, playoff, it would've meant nothing.
Posted by Partha
Member since Jan 2022
7876 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:36 am to
quote:

How much did it suck if your team lost a game in October and it meant your season was over. There are now more meaningful games.
In some ways yes, and others no.

There are more meaningful games in that a 1 or 2 loss team still could make the playoffs, but a lot of late season games between undefeated or 1 loss teams mean a lot less now since both are likely shoe-ins for the playoffs. Especially if they expand to 24 teams
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
16201 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:48 am to
quote:

Especially if they expand to 24 teams


This I 100% disagree with and it will totally water down the sport.
Posted by Hamma1122
Member since Sep 2016
22495 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:48 am to
Nah
Posted by Partha
Member since Jan 2022
7876 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:53 am to
quote:

This I 100% disagree with and it will totally water down the sport.
I agree with you completely.

I will admit, as much as I complain about the 12 team playoff's effect on the regular season, I did enjoy most of the playoffs last season, outside of the Tulane and JMU games. Overall, it was really entertaining.

But a 24 team would really make it hard to get excited about the CFB regular season.
Posted by ATLTiger7
Member since Dec 2019
142 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:04 pm to
It honestly felt like the BCS era was probably the best in terms of national parity and different teams from across the country being in the mix.

1998- Tennessee

1999- Florida State

2000- Oklahoma

2001- Miami

2002- Ohio St

2003- LSU

2004- USC

2005- Texas

2006- Florida

2007- LSU

2008- Florida

2009- Bama

2010- Auburn

Then Saban really took over and it got less interesting.

In that span from 1998-2010, 11 different teams won titles in 13 different seasons from across 6 different conferences. I'm biased as an LSU fan, but I'm convinced that was the "golden era" and when CFB really took off and reached its pinnacle.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
38281 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 3:14 pm to
The overall talent on the field is very good. The overall atmosphere has taken a hit though.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
55978 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 4:04 pm to
Not for me.

But let's see what the TV ratings show us for the regular season games.
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
21506 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

I really liked bowl season growing up as a kid.


Bowls were great in the 1970s and 1980s.

Some of the broadcast weee pretty raw. MIZLOU was a network I remember doing minor bowl games.

RAYCOM had some too.
Posted by CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
Member since Dec 2014
18478 posts
Posted on 8/3/26 at 9:10 pm to
I'm seeing more and more shitty ads during the games. So I'll go with no.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram