Started By
Message

re: Iowa State has 17 players returning, 1 starter. The transfer portal is ruining CFB.

Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:20 am to
Posted by jmcwhrter
Member since Nov 2012
7719 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:20 am to
quote:

NIL isn't the problem, though.

The problem is the unbridled free agency with zero consequences.


NIL is a bigger problem at the G5 schools where you have players that likely won't go to the NFL, and may not quite be good enough to get serious playing time at a P4 school, so they try to cash in one last time before starting their careers as high school assistant coaches.

Then you've got dickheads like Brandon Shelvin in Lafayette who open up an agency down the street from the university and then calls around and shops UL's players to other teams - usually without the player even knowing. Then they reach out - probably to a mom - and say "if you enter the portal I can get you $30k".

Nevermind the full ride scholarship to a university that could give you a degree that could set you up for life... Gotta get that $30k bag for football
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
15909 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:35 am to
quote:

The problem is the unbridled free agency with zero consequences.

I also don't like it, but mainly bc of how I was raised (dare I say, brainwashed) on the structure of organized sports and who I root for.

But maybe we should step back and simply think of it as a job. None of us have a problem with someone trying out multiple jobs or multiple schools until they find the right one.

I certainly wouldn't want job restrictions placed if I tried out a landscaping job at Texas aTm, then thought MSU might have a cooler climate, but then missed home and tried out Texas St, but then got a better offer in a dry climate at UNLV, but then realized it was way too hot for landscaping, only then to be told by some governing body told I have used up all my job-changing allowances.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
36498 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:39 am to
quote:

NIL is a bigger problem at the G5 schools where you have players that likely won't go to the NFL, and may not quite be good enough to get serious playing time at a P4 school, so they try to cash in one last time before starting their careers as high school assistant coaches.

If players still had to sit out a year when transferring, it would solve a lot of the issues with NIL. But I don’t think that toothpaste is going back in the tube.
Posted by Boodis Man
Member since Sep 2020
7391 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:43 am to
You shouldn't be able to just pack up and quit like this. Letters of intent for sports need to be a contract now
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
69891 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:49 am to
The only thing that will slow it down is a penalty to transfer. Like before


Sit out a year and no NIL for that year

Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27668 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Honestly the NIL stuff doesn't bother me.

It’s the transfer crap that ruins college sports. Go back to those rules with the NIL and we're good.


This.

NIL is here to stay, but we need to go back to requiring an athlete to sit a year if he/she transfers. If a booster wants an athlete that bad at their school, then they can pay the first year where the athlete doesn’t see the field.

An exception can be made if the head coach that recruited said athlete leaves the program. But that’s it.
This post was edited on 12/30/25 at 7:53 am
Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
17960 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:53 am to
quote:

You shouldn't be able to just pack up and quit like this.


In a situation like this, where your coach has packed up and quit, I’m good with it.

It’s about the only time I’m good with it.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27668 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:55 am to
quote:

have anti tampering rules and actually enforce them


Would be nice, but that’s pie in the sky.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27668 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 7:58 am to
quote:

Then you've got dickheads like Brandon Shelvin in Lafayette who open up an agency down the street from the university and then calls around and shops UL's players to other teams


That guy has always been a POS, even before he started doing this NIL agency thing.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71322 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:00 am to
quote:

An exception can be made if the head coach that recruited said athlete leaves the program. But that’s it.

About 1/4 of FBS schools had a head coaching change this offseason. I don’t think there should be an exception for a coaching change

NFL players’ contracts aren’t voided if the coach leaves. Why should paid athletes in college be any different?
This post was edited on 12/30/25 at 8:01 am
Posted by jmcwhrter
Member since Nov 2012
7719 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:00 am to
quote:

If players still had to sit out a year when transferring, it would solve a lot of the issues with NIL. But I don’t think that toothpaste is going back in the tube


Nah.. thats a 'limitation on the ability make money off of your name'

They'll eventually give up this 'student athlete' and scholarship farce, and the players will be under contract like any other employee.

The question is, will they be able to limit then from leaving in the middle of the contract like the coaches love to do?
Posted by danilo
Member since Nov 2008
24866 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:01 am to
Is this “bad”? New coach coming in. Players weren’t recruited by or committed to the new guy. Seems appropriate to me actually
This post was edited on 12/30/25 at 9:50 am
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
71322 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:02 am to
quote:

will they be able to limit then from leaving in the middle of the contract like the coaches love to do?

Coaches pay buyouts to do that. Those liquidated damages are part of the contract.
Posted by danilo
Member since Nov 2008
24866 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:03 am to
quote:

I thought college was for education?

Coaches sure as shite aren’t there to educate either. All about Straight Cash homie.
Big time College football is about multi billion dollar TV contracts, a tool to increase donations, corporate sponsorship, high ticket prices, and gambling apps
Ain’t about education, school spirit, or loyalty. This isn’t middle school football. Baws need to stop crying about the changes to college football. It’s not about love of the game anymore and coaches aren’t glorified PE teachers either. Roll with it or get rolled over.
This post was edited on 12/30/25 at 9:53 am
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53815 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:41 am to
quote:

You need enforceable contracts, you can't have every single player on every single team being a free agent every year.


That would be a great way to sell hope to fans though… you’re never more than one year away from a potential winner
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
33854 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:46 am to
Not ruining.. The portal and NIL have ruined college fb
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
25037 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:55 am to
quote:


An easy solution would be to treat CFB like professional soccer. When a player signs, that team also ‘owns’ the transfer rights. If a guy enters the portal, they can still go wherever they want, but the school they transfer too must pay the pre set transfer fee [*based on the player’s premium] to the school he left.

This way smaller schools are incentivized to develop players for big ROIs on players, and mid to top level teams get funds to replace a player that leaves.

*Plus you’re. Putting a ‘luxury cap’ on the ‘rich’ teams and will slow them from gobbling up everyone good at once.


This could work. Would be such a massive transformation from how things have been but it would be better than the current wild west.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
19065 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:59 am to
If they just bring back the sit out a year after transferring rule, this would mostly stop IMO.
Posted by karmew32
Scott, LA (born & raised in Ponchy)
Member since Jan 2017
1752 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:00 am to
If you think about it, Iowa State set the realignment/NIL arms race into motion way back in 2011.
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
33354 posts
Posted on 12/30/25 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Sit out a year and no NIL for that year
That isn't going to happen. Someone is going to have to pay the guy for the year he sits out. The new school should have to pay the guy to sit out. If he's that good, it might be worth it. Hopefully that would cut back on how many transfers teams take. Make it cost the schools who are willing to pay.
This post was edited on 12/30/25 at 10:13 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram