Started By
Message

re: In their prime, do you take Herschel Walker or Bo Jackson?

Posted on 11/30/12 at 2:21 pm to
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 2:21 pm to
Why not take yds/gm instead of ypc? Why ignore receiving statistics since the NFL counts those yards and TDs just as much as rushing statistics?

Look, I've been a Raider fans since 1964 when I went to my first Raider's game at Frank Youell Field. I loved watching Bo, but he was never more than a part time player for the Raiders. Putting him in the game also meant taking Marcus Allen out. Some would question whether that was beneficial.

Why discount Walker's stats to treat him like a part time player? He was anything but a part time player. And how does Walker average only 4.3 ypc in your discounted world when he never averaged less than 4.4 ypc in real life? Walker ran for 6,299 yards on 1,294 carries or 4.9 ypc. Reducing his carries to equal Jackson's for comparison sake should not change his ypc. I guess that is Auburn math at work.
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
88185 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Tiger n Miami AU83
Auburn Fan



quote:

I'll take Bo.



shocking
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

never averaged less than 4.4 ypc in real life?


Second year in NFL. YPC = 4.26
Third year in NFL. YPC = 4.19

From your link poodlebrain.

Guess the name fits. Who sucks at math now?

ETA: Fourth year in NFL. YPC = 3.66
This post was edited on 11/30/12 at 2:37 pm
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
72129 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 2:38 pm to
Bo.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 2:38 pm to
frick it, this is fun...

Walker - NFL

5th year: 4.2 YPC
6th year: 4.2 YPC
7th year: 4.0 YPC

And so on. But he never averaged less than 4.4 ypc in real life, right?
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 2:42 pm to
Bo in NFL:

Year 1: 6.9 YPC
Year 2: 4.3 YPC
Year 3: 5.5 YPC
Year 4: 5.6 YPC

Keep in mind, Bo didn't even have the benefit of training camp. He had very little practice with his offense, which holes to hit, etc. Hell, he barely even had time to learn the playbook when he jumped from baseball to football right after baseball season ended and football season was in full swing.

About impossible to say some practice and training camp to learn the playbook and the holes to hit as well as get in football shape would not have been likely to result in even better numbers. Yep, even better than what was/is the best YPC in NFL history by a RB.
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 3:18 pm to
quote:


Keep in mind, Bo didn't even have the benefit of training camp. He had very little practice with his offense, which holes to hit, etc. Hell, he barely even had time to learn the playbook when he jumped from baseball to football right after baseball season ended and football season was in full swing.


Which is why you'd take Walker.

Bo is the great what if in sports history? Coming in midway through the season to dazzle with a few runs. He's more legend than reality.

Biggest upside is definitely Bo. But going by their college and pro careers (which is all you can go on) - the player you'd take is Walker for his years and production and consistency.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30338 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

Herschel wold kick the shite out of Bo today in or out the ring.

Bo knows how to kick the shite out of people though.
I mean Bo knows and can do anything and everything
Can Herschel pick up a tree and smash a bull dozer? i rest my case.

Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
90319 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 4:03 pm to
Yall using Herschel's "first x amount of years in the NFL" is apples and oranges. Herschel went to the USFL first, and played there in likely his prime years. Comparing what he did a few years later after going to the NFL to Bo's first few years just isn't the same.

Why don't you compare their first whatever years of professional football?
Posted by Papa Tigah
TIGER ISLAND, LA
Member since Sep 2007
20451 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 4:10 pm to
Bo knows football.
Posted by Tigerfan53
Death Valley
Member since Nov 2010
3168 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 4:11 pm to
Bo. Not close.
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
35500 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

Yall using Herschel's "first x amount of years in the NFL" is apples and oranges. Herschel went to the USFL first, and played there in likely his prime years. Comparing what he did a few years later after going to the NFL to Bo's first few years just isn't the same.

Why don't you compare their first whatever years of professional football?


Dude you tried to use the "Herschel played one less year" argument. Conveniently leaving out the fact that in three years Walker had over 350 more carries than Bo Jackson in four.

I'm not saying the NFL comparison is a good one, but neither was yours.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 4:17 pm to
Walker would beat the shite out of almost every other human being on the planet even at this age.

Holy Jesus what a freak.
Posted by TT9
Seychelles
Member since Sep 2008
91793 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 4:20 pm to
You're splitting hairs with this thread, both were phenomenal.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 4:21 pm to
O.J. Simpson

The RB not the murderer
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
33359 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

Herschel Walker. No contest.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216467 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

In their prime, do you take Herschel Walker or Bo Jackson?



WALKER.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290874 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

Bo Jackson had 4,575 career all-purpose yards in 4 years at Auburn. Herschel Walker had 5,259 RUSHING yards in just three years.



just for some perspective, Walker had 994 carries & Bo Jackson had 650


Walker had better stats. Bo was the better RB.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216467 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

frick it, this is fun...



I agree. In COLLEGE its Walker and its not close. In the NFL its Jackson and its not close.
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
35500 posts
Posted on 11/30/12 at 4:43 pm to
The only time they were in similar positions is Bo in 1985 and compare that to Herschel's seasons. They were pretty much dead on with Bo having a ypc. With that said, there is a lot to be said for durability.

Basically anyone saying "not close" for either guy is just not being very smart.
This post was edited on 11/30/12 at 4:45 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram